Cargando…

Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery

BACKGROUND: Four‐factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F‐PCC) dosing is based on INR and actual body weight (ABW), with maximum doses not to exceed the dose used in patients weighing >100 kg (Kcentra PI). There are limited data comparing the efficacy of 4F‐PCC between patients with low body we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rimsans, Jessica, Berger, Karen, Culbreth, Sarah, Hood, Christopher, Chester, Katleen, Connors, Jean M., Omert, Laurel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12624
_version_ 1784606689868120064
author Rimsans, Jessica
Berger, Karen
Culbreth, Sarah
Hood, Christopher
Chester, Katleen
Connors, Jean M.
Omert, Laurel
author_facet Rimsans, Jessica
Berger, Karen
Culbreth, Sarah
Hood, Christopher
Chester, Katleen
Connors, Jean M.
Omert, Laurel
author_sort Rimsans, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Four‐factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F‐PCC) dosing is based on INR and actual body weight (ABW), with maximum doses not to exceed the dose used in patients weighing >100 kg (Kcentra PI). There are limited data comparing the efficacy of 4F‐PCC between patients with low body weight ≤100 kg (LoWT) and high body weight >100 kg (HiWT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients on warfarin who received 4F‐PCC for life‐threatening major bleeding or requiring emergent surgery between January 2015 to June 2018 at three academic medical centers. These data were combined with a dataset from 2 randomized Phase 3b clinical trials. RESULTS: We included 388 patients who received 4F‐PCC, 318 (82%) were LoWT, and 70 (18%) were HiWT. Indication for 4F‐PCC for life‐threatening bleeding and emergent surgery was 266 (69%) and 122 (31%) patients, respectively. The most common bleeding type was intracranial hemorrhage (41%), followed by gastrointestinal (36%). The median dose was 2283 units (25 units/kg), and 2.1% of patients required a repeat dose. CONCLUSION: In those >100 kg, we found no difference in achieving international normalized ratio (INR) ≤1.3, hemostasis in intracranial hemorrhage, or thrombosis. In‐hospital mortality occurred 15% in LoWt versus 6% in HiWT (CI 1.8%–17%, p = 0.034). Achievement of INR ≤ 1.5 was significantly lower in the LoWT group compared to the HiWT group (80% versus 91%, CI −20% to −2.5%, p = 0.03).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86266052021-12-03 Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery Rimsans, Jessica Berger, Karen Culbreth, Sarah Hood, Christopher Chester, Katleen Connors, Jean M. Omert, Laurel Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles BACKGROUND: Four‐factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F‐PCC) dosing is based on INR and actual body weight (ABW), with maximum doses not to exceed the dose used in patients weighing >100 kg (Kcentra PI). There are limited data comparing the efficacy of 4F‐PCC between patients with low body weight ≤100 kg (LoWT) and high body weight >100 kg (HiWT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients on warfarin who received 4F‐PCC for life‐threatening major bleeding or requiring emergent surgery between January 2015 to June 2018 at three academic medical centers. These data were combined with a dataset from 2 randomized Phase 3b clinical trials. RESULTS: We included 388 patients who received 4F‐PCC, 318 (82%) were LoWT, and 70 (18%) were HiWT. Indication for 4F‐PCC for life‐threatening bleeding and emergent surgery was 266 (69%) and 122 (31%) patients, respectively. The most common bleeding type was intracranial hemorrhage (41%), followed by gastrointestinal (36%). The median dose was 2283 units (25 units/kg), and 2.1% of patients required a repeat dose. CONCLUSION: In those >100 kg, we found no difference in achieving international normalized ratio (INR) ≤1.3, hemostasis in intracranial hemorrhage, or thrombosis. In‐hospital mortality occurred 15% in LoWt versus 6% in HiWT (CI 1.8%–17%, p = 0.034). Achievement of INR ≤ 1.5 was significantly lower in the LoWT group compared to the HiWT group (80% versus 91%, CI −20% to −2.5%, p = 0.03). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8626605/ /pubmed/34870070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12624 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rimsans, Jessica
Berger, Karen
Culbreth, Sarah
Hood, Christopher
Chester, Katleen
Connors, Jean M.
Omert, Laurel
Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery
title Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery
title_full Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery
title_short Comparison of 4F‐PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery
title_sort comparison of 4f‐pcc in obese and nonobese patients with life‐threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12624
work_keys_str_mv AT rimsansjessica comparisonof4fpccinobeseandnonobesepatientswithlifethreateningbleedingorrequiringemergentsurgery
AT bergerkaren comparisonof4fpccinobeseandnonobesepatientswithlifethreateningbleedingorrequiringemergentsurgery
AT culbrethsarah comparisonof4fpccinobeseandnonobesepatientswithlifethreateningbleedingorrequiringemergentsurgery
AT hoodchristopher comparisonof4fpccinobeseandnonobesepatientswithlifethreateningbleedingorrequiringemergentsurgery
AT chesterkatleen comparisonof4fpccinobeseandnonobesepatientswithlifethreateningbleedingorrequiringemergentsurgery
AT connorsjeanm comparisonof4fpccinobeseandnonobesepatientswithlifethreateningbleedingorrequiringemergentsurgery
AT omertlaurel comparisonof4fpccinobeseandnonobesepatientswithlifethreateningbleedingorrequiringemergentsurgery