Cargando…
Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) or Hay fever is a chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa induced by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity due to exposure of various allergens. AR occurs as a response against these inhaled allergens that cause inflammation of nasal mucosal membranes. In this study, a re...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00181-y |
_version_ | 1784606718615879680 |
---|---|
author | Shankari, P. Kiruba Suresh, Swathi Begum, Rukaiah Fatma |
author_facet | Shankari, P. Kiruba Suresh, Swathi Begum, Rukaiah Fatma |
author_sort | Shankari, P. Kiruba |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) or Hay fever is a chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa induced by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity due to exposure of various allergens. AR occurs as a response against these inhaled allergens that cause inflammation of nasal mucosal membranes. In this study, a reliable treatment for allergic rhinitis with maximum effectiveness and minimal side effects was assessed. This study compared the effectiveness of intranasal Fluticasone propionate (FUP) and intranasal Budesonide (BUD) in reducing the eosinophil count and in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms. This prospective study was conducted on 62 cases of allergic rhinitis and patients with mild-to-moderate allergic rhinitis were selected for the study. They were randomly divided into two groups; group I consists of 30 patients who received intranasal Fluticasone propionate aqueous spray, total daily dose of 200 μg (50 μg/spray) as 2 sprays in each nostril administered once daily, whereas the group II consists of 32 patients who received intranasal Budesonide aqueous spray, total daily dose of 400 μg/day (100 μg/spray) as 1 spray in each nostril administered twice daily. RESULTS: Analysis on patient-based symptom scores revealed that both the groups showed statistically significant reduction in symptoms. Fluticasone propionate was found to be significantly more effective (P < 0.05) than Budesonide in reducing sneezing, nasal itching and majority of symptoms of individual symptom scores. Budesonide showed somewhat similar effect in reducing nasal blockage at 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinically, both the drugs showed statistically significant improvement when compared to baseline, but Fluticasone propionate was superior at reducing nasal symptoms, ocular symptom and eosinophil count. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8626750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86267502021-11-29 Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study Shankari, P. Kiruba Suresh, Swathi Begum, Rukaiah Fatma Egypt J Otolaryngol Original Article BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) or Hay fever is a chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa induced by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity due to exposure of various allergens. AR occurs as a response against these inhaled allergens that cause inflammation of nasal mucosal membranes. In this study, a reliable treatment for allergic rhinitis with maximum effectiveness and minimal side effects was assessed. This study compared the effectiveness of intranasal Fluticasone propionate (FUP) and intranasal Budesonide (BUD) in reducing the eosinophil count and in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms. This prospective study was conducted on 62 cases of allergic rhinitis and patients with mild-to-moderate allergic rhinitis were selected for the study. They were randomly divided into two groups; group I consists of 30 patients who received intranasal Fluticasone propionate aqueous spray, total daily dose of 200 μg (50 μg/spray) as 2 sprays in each nostril administered once daily, whereas the group II consists of 32 patients who received intranasal Budesonide aqueous spray, total daily dose of 400 μg/day (100 μg/spray) as 1 spray in each nostril administered twice daily. RESULTS: Analysis on patient-based symptom scores revealed that both the groups showed statistically significant reduction in symptoms. Fluticasone propionate was found to be significantly more effective (P < 0.05) than Budesonide in reducing sneezing, nasal itching and majority of symptoms of individual symptom scores. Budesonide showed somewhat similar effect in reducing nasal blockage at 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinically, both the drugs showed statistically significant improvement when compared to baseline, but Fluticasone propionate was superior at reducing nasal symptoms, ocular symptom and eosinophil count. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8626750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00181-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shankari, P. Kiruba Suresh, Swathi Begum, Rukaiah Fatma Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study |
title | Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study |
title_full | Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study |
title_short | Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study |
title_sort | efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00181-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shankaripkiruba efficacyofintranasalfluticasonepropionateandbudesonideinmanagementofallergicrhinitisaprospectivecomparativestudy AT sureshswathi efficacyofintranasalfluticasonepropionateandbudesonideinmanagementofallergicrhinitisaprospectivecomparativestudy AT begumrukaiahfatma efficacyofintranasalfluticasonepropionateandbudesonideinmanagementofallergicrhinitisaprospectivecomparativestudy |