Cargando…

Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) or Hay fever is a chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa induced by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity due to exposure of various allergens. AR occurs as a response against these inhaled allergens that cause inflammation of nasal mucosal membranes. In this study, a re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shankari, P. Kiruba, Suresh, Swathi, Begum, Rukaiah Fatma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626750/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00181-y
_version_ 1784606718615879680
author Shankari, P. Kiruba
Suresh, Swathi
Begum, Rukaiah Fatma
author_facet Shankari, P. Kiruba
Suresh, Swathi
Begum, Rukaiah Fatma
author_sort Shankari, P. Kiruba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) or Hay fever is a chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa induced by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity due to exposure of various allergens. AR occurs as a response against these inhaled allergens that cause inflammation of nasal mucosal membranes. In this study, a reliable treatment for allergic rhinitis with maximum effectiveness and minimal side effects was assessed. This study compared the effectiveness of intranasal Fluticasone propionate (FUP) and intranasal Budesonide (BUD) in reducing the eosinophil count and in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms. This prospective study was conducted on 62 cases of allergic rhinitis and patients with mild-to-moderate allergic rhinitis were selected for the study. They were randomly divided into two groups; group I consists of 30 patients who received intranasal Fluticasone propionate aqueous spray, total daily dose of 200 μg (50 μg/spray) as 2 sprays in each nostril administered once daily, whereas the group II consists of 32 patients who received intranasal Budesonide aqueous spray, total daily dose of 400 μg/day (100 μg/spray) as 1 spray in each nostril administered twice daily. RESULTS: Analysis on patient-based symptom scores revealed that both the groups showed statistically significant reduction in symptoms. Fluticasone propionate was found to be significantly more effective (P < 0.05) than Budesonide in reducing sneezing, nasal itching and majority of symptoms of individual symptom scores. Budesonide showed somewhat similar effect in reducing nasal blockage at 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinically, both the drugs showed statistically significant improvement when compared to baseline, but Fluticasone propionate was superior at reducing nasal symptoms, ocular symptom and eosinophil count.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86267502021-11-29 Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study Shankari, P. Kiruba Suresh, Swathi Begum, Rukaiah Fatma Egypt J Otolaryngol Original Article BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) or Hay fever is a chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa induced by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity due to exposure of various allergens. AR occurs as a response against these inhaled allergens that cause inflammation of nasal mucosal membranes. In this study, a reliable treatment for allergic rhinitis with maximum effectiveness and minimal side effects was assessed. This study compared the effectiveness of intranasal Fluticasone propionate (FUP) and intranasal Budesonide (BUD) in reducing the eosinophil count and in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms. This prospective study was conducted on 62 cases of allergic rhinitis and patients with mild-to-moderate allergic rhinitis were selected for the study. They were randomly divided into two groups; group I consists of 30 patients who received intranasal Fluticasone propionate aqueous spray, total daily dose of 200 μg (50 μg/spray) as 2 sprays in each nostril administered once daily, whereas the group II consists of 32 patients who received intranasal Budesonide aqueous spray, total daily dose of 400 μg/day (100 μg/spray) as 1 spray in each nostril administered twice daily. RESULTS: Analysis on patient-based symptom scores revealed that both the groups showed statistically significant reduction in symptoms. Fluticasone propionate was found to be significantly more effective (P < 0.05) than Budesonide in reducing sneezing, nasal itching and majority of symptoms of individual symptom scores. Budesonide showed somewhat similar effect in reducing nasal blockage at 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinically, both the drugs showed statistically significant improvement when compared to baseline, but Fluticasone propionate was superior at reducing nasal symptoms, ocular symptom and eosinophil count. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8626750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00181-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Shankari, P. Kiruba
Suresh, Swathi
Begum, Rukaiah Fatma
Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
title Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
title_full Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
title_fullStr Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
title_short Efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
title_sort efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate and budesonide in management of allergic rhinitis—a prospective comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626750/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00181-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shankaripkiruba efficacyofintranasalfluticasonepropionateandbudesonideinmanagementofallergicrhinitisaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT sureshswathi efficacyofintranasalfluticasonepropionateandbudesonideinmanagementofallergicrhinitisaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT begumrukaiahfatma efficacyofintranasalfluticasonepropionateandbudesonideinmanagementofallergicrhinitisaprospectivecomparativestudy