Cargando…

Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies

OBJECTIVES: Foetal anthropometry evaluates and monitors foetal development and assesses the nutritional state of the developing foetus. It is a vital indicator of the normalcy of foetal development in-utero. The most relevant parameters in foetal anthropometry are biparietal diameter (BPD), head cir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Rhea, Gupta, Chandni, Punja, Rohini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taibah University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.08.004
_version_ 1784606727149191168
author Lewis, Rhea
Gupta, Chandni
Punja, Rohini
author_facet Lewis, Rhea
Gupta, Chandni
Punja, Rohini
author_sort Lewis, Rhea
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Foetal anthropometry evaluates and monitors foetal development and assesses the nutritional state of the developing foetus. It is a vital indicator of the normalcy of foetal development in-utero. The most relevant parameters in foetal anthropometry are biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL). Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and gestational hypertension (GHTN) are the major reasons for variations in foetal development. In this study, we compare foetal anthropometric measurements taken using ultrasounds of normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies. METHOD: In this study, a total of 615 anomaly scans were done between the gestational ages of 18–22 weeks from 2016 to 2018. The patients’ data were collected from the register of the anomaly scanning room. The foetal anthropometric parameters measured BPD, HC, AC, and FL. RESULTS: All the measurements including BPD, HC, and AC were lower in foetuses affected by GHTN, and all the measurements, including FL, were higher in foetuses affected by GDM than in normal pregnancies. A post-hoc analysis using Tukey's test showed that each foetal parameter had a significant correlation with pregnancy-related co-morbidities (p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is clear from our study that the foetuses of mothers with GDM showed a consistent variation of 10 mm above the normal average in terms of the BPD, HC, AC, and FL measurements. The GHTN-affected foetuses had averages that were lower than normal for BPD, HC, and AC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taibah University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86267962021-12-10 Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies Lewis, Rhea Gupta, Chandni Punja, Rohini J Taibah Univ Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: Foetal anthropometry evaluates and monitors foetal development and assesses the nutritional state of the developing foetus. It is a vital indicator of the normalcy of foetal development in-utero. The most relevant parameters in foetal anthropometry are biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL). Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and gestational hypertension (GHTN) are the major reasons for variations in foetal development. In this study, we compare foetal anthropometric measurements taken using ultrasounds of normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies. METHOD: In this study, a total of 615 anomaly scans were done between the gestational ages of 18–22 weeks from 2016 to 2018. The patients’ data were collected from the register of the anomaly scanning room. The foetal anthropometric parameters measured BPD, HC, AC, and FL. RESULTS: All the measurements including BPD, HC, and AC were lower in foetuses affected by GHTN, and all the measurements, including FL, were higher in foetuses affected by GDM than in normal pregnancies. A post-hoc analysis using Tukey's test showed that each foetal parameter had a significant correlation with pregnancy-related co-morbidities (p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is clear from our study that the foetuses of mothers with GDM showed a consistent variation of 10 mm above the normal average in terms of the BPD, HC, AC, and FL measurements. The GHTN-affected foetuses had averages that were lower than normal for BPD, HC, and AC. Taibah University 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8626796/ /pubmed/34899134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.08.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lewis, Rhea
Gupta, Chandni
Punja, Rohini
Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies
title Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies
title_full Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies
title_fullStr Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies
title_short Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies
title_sort comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.08.004
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisrhea comparisonofanthropometricmeasurementsoffoetusesinnormalgestationaldiabetesaffectedandhypertensivepregnancies
AT guptachandni comparisonofanthropometricmeasurementsoffoetusesinnormalgestationaldiabetesaffectedandhypertensivepregnancies
AT punjarohini comparisonofanthropometricmeasurementsoffoetusesinnormalgestationaldiabetesaffectedandhypertensivepregnancies