Cargando…
Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure as orthopaedic patients seek to remain active longer in life, resulting in more ligamentous knee injuries. Graft selection is at the forefront of decision making in knee reconstruction, with advantages and disadvanta...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.002 |
_version_ | 1784606727384072192 |
---|---|
author | DeFroda, Steven Fice, Michael Tepper, Sarah Bach, Bernard R. |
author_facet | DeFroda, Steven Fice, Michael Tepper, Sarah Bach, Bernard R. |
author_sort | DeFroda, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure as orthopaedic patients seek to remain active longer in life, resulting in more ligamentous knee injuries. Graft selection is at the forefront of decision making in knee reconstruction, with advantages and disadvantages to various grafts, including allograft to autograft. Although the gold standard for the ACL reconstruction of elite athletes and highly active patients has traditionally been bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB), this graft is not without its disadvantages, such as increased operative time, increased postoperative pain, potential for anterior knee pain, larger incision, violation of the extensor mechanism, and potentially kneeling pain. Soft tissue autografts (hamstring, quadriceps) offer a good alternative; however, they may be associated with higher rerupture rates, as well as associated donor site morbidity. Additionally, soft tissue allografts have a higher graft rupture rate. For this reason, it is the senior author’s preference to perform allograft ACL reconstruction with BTB allograft in appropriately selected patients. We describe our technique for an efficient and reproducible BTB allograft preparation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8626798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86267982021-12-02 Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation DeFroda, Steven Fice, Michael Tepper, Sarah Bach, Bernard R. Arthrosc Tech Technical Note Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure as orthopaedic patients seek to remain active longer in life, resulting in more ligamentous knee injuries. Graft selection is at the forefront of decision making in knee reconstruction, with advantages and disadvantages to various grafts, including allograft to autograft. Although the gold standard for the ACL reconstruction of elite athletes and highly active patients has traditionally been bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB), this graft is not without its disadvantages, such as increased operative time, increased postoperative pain, potential for anterior knee pain, larger incision, violation of the extensor mechanism, and potentially kneeling pain. Soft tissue autografts (hamstring, quadriceps) offer a good alternative; however, they may be associated with higher rerupture rates, as well as associated donor site morbidity. Additionally, soft tissue allografts have a higher graft rupture rate. For this reason, it is the senior author’s preference to perform allograft ACL reconstruction with BTB allograft in appropriately selected patients. We describe our technique for an efficient and reproducible BTB allograft preparation. Elsevier 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8626798/ /pubmed/34868866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.002 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Technical Note DeFroda, Steven Fice, Michael Tepper, Sarah Bach, Bernard R. Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation |
title | Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation |
title_full | Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation |
title_fullStr | Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation |
title_full_unstemmed | Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation |
title_short | Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation |
title_sort | our preferred technique for bone–patellar tendon–bone allograft preparation |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT defrodasteven ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation AT ficemichael ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation AT teppersarah ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation AT bachbernardr ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation |