Cargando…

Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure as orthopaedic patients seek to remain active longer in life, resulting in more ligamentous knee injuries. Graft selection is at the forefront of decision making in knee reconstruction, with advantages and disadvanta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeFroda, Steven, Fice, Michael, Tepper, Sarah, Bach, Bernard R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.002
_version_ 1784606727384072192
author DeFroda, Steven
Fice, Michael
Tepper, Sarah
Bach, Bernard R.
author_facet DeFroda, Steven
Fice, Michael
Tepper, Sarah
Bach, Bernard R.
author_sort DeFroda, Steven
collection PubMed
description Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure as orthopaedic patients seek to remain active longer in life, resulting in more ligamentous knee injuries. Graft selection is at the forefront of decision making in knee reconstruction, with advantages and disadvantages to various grafts, including allograft to autograft. Although the gold standard for the ACL reconstruction of elite athletes and highly active patients has traditionally been bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB), this graft is not without its disadvantages, such as increased operative time, increased postoperative pain, potential for anterior knee pain, larger incision, violation of the extensor mechanism, and potentially kneeling pain. Soft tissue autografts (hamstring, quadriceps) offer a good alternative; however, they may be associated with higher rerupture rates, as well as associated donor site morbidity. Additionally, soft tissue allografts have a higher graft rupture rate. For this reason, it is the senior author’s preference to perform allograft ACL reconstruction with BTB allograft in appropriately selected patients. We describe our technique for an efficient and reproducible BTB allograft preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86267982021-12-02 Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation DeFroda, Steven Fice, Michael Tepper, Sarah Bach, Bernard R. Arthrosc Tech Technical Note Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure as orthopaedic patients seek to remain active longer in life, resulting in more ligamentous knee injuries. Graft selection is at the forefront of decision making in knee reconstruction, with advantages and disadvantages to various grafts, including allograft to autograft. Although the gold standard for the ACL reconstruction of elite athletes and highly active patients has traditionally been bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB), this graft is not without its disadvantages, such as increased operative time, increased postoperative pain, potential for anterior knee pain, larger incision, violation of the extensor mechanism, and potentially kneeling pain. Soft tissue autografts (hamstring, quadriceps) offer a good alternative; however, they may be associated with higher rerupture rates, as well as associated donor site morbidity. Additionally, soft tissue allografts have a higher graft rupture rate. For this reason, it is the senior author’s preference to perform allograft ACL reconstruction with BTB allograft in appropriately selected patients. We describe our technique for an efficient and reproducible BTB allograft preparation. Elsevier 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8626798/ /pubmed/34868866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.002 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
DeFroda, Steven
Fice, Michael
Tepper, Sarah
Bach, Bernard R.
Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation
title Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation
title_full Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation
title_fullStr Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation
title_full_unstemmed Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation
title_short Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation
title_sort our preferred technique for bone–patellar tendon–bone allograft preparation
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT defrodasteven ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation
AT ficemichael ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation
AT teppersarah ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation
AT bachbernardr ourpreferredtechniqueforbonepatellartendonboneallograftpreparation