Cargando…
Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field
PURPOSE: To investigate whether a correction based on a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) can improve the prediction performance of a deep learning model to predict the HFA 10-2 VF test from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. METHODS: This is a multicent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34812893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.13.28 |
_version_ | 1784606737798529024 |
---|---|
author | Hashimoto, Yohei Kiwaki, Taichi Sugiura, Hiroki Asano, Shotaro Murata, Hiroshi Fujino, Yuri Matsuura, Masato Miki, Atsuya Mori, Kazuhiko Ikeda, Yoko Kanamoto, Takashi Yamagami, Junkichi Inoue, Kenji Tanito, Masaki Yamanishi, Kenji Asaoka, Ryo |
author_facet | Hashimoto, Yohei Kiwaki, Taichi Sugiura, Hiroki Asano, Shotaro Murata, Hiroshi Fujino, Yuri Matsuura, Masato Miki, Atsuya Mori, Kazuhiko Ikeda, Yoko Kanamoto, Takashi Yamagami, Junkichi Inoue, Kenji Tanito, Masaki Yamanishi, Kenji Asaoka, Ryo |
author_sort | Hashimoto, Yohei |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate whether a correction based on a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) can improve the prediction performance of a deep learning model to predict the HFA 10-2 VF test from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. METHODS: This is a multicenter, cross-sectional study. The training dataset comprised 493 eyes of 285 subjects (407, open-angle glaucoma [OAG]; 86, normative) who underwent HFA 10-2 testing and macular OCT. The independent testing dataset comprised 104 OAG eyes of 82 subjects who had undergone HFA 10-2 test, HFA 24-2/30-2 test, and macular OCT. A convolutional neural network (CNN) DL model was trained to predict threshold sensitivity (TH) values in HFA 10-2 from retinal thickness measured by macular OCT. The predicted TH values was modified by pattern-based regularization (PBR) and corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. Absolute error (AE) of mean TH values and mean absolute error (MAE) of TH values were compared between the CNN-PBR alone model and the CNN-PBR corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. RESULTS: AE of mean TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with HFA 24-2/30-2 correction than in the CNN-PBR alone (1.9dB vs. 2.6dB; P = 0.006). MAE of TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with correction compared to the CNN-PBR alone (4.2dB vs. 5.3 dB; P < 0.001). The inferior temporal quadrant showed lower prediction errors compared with other quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a DL model to predict 10-2 VF from macular OCT was improved by the correction with HFA 24-2/30-2. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This model can reduce the burden of additional HFA 10-2 by making the best use of routinely performed HFA 24-2/30-2 and macular OCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8626848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86268482021-12-09 Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field Hashimoto, Yohei Kiwaki, Taichi Sugiura, Hiroki Asano, Shotaro Murata, Hiroshi Fujino, Yuri Matsuura, Masato Miki, Atsuya Mori, Kazuhiko Ikeda, Yoko Kanamoto, Takashi Yamagami, Junkichi Inoue, Kenji Tanito, Masaki Yamanishi, Kenji Asaoka, Ryo Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To investigate whether a correction based on a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) can improve the prediction performance of a deep learning model to predict the HFA 10-2 VF test from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. METHODS: This is a multicenter, cross-sectional study. The training dataset comprised 493 eyes of 285 subjects (407, open-angle glaucoma [OAG]; 86, normative) who underwent HFA 10-2 testing and macular OCT. The independent testing dataset comprised 104 OAG eyes of 82 subjects who had undergone HFA 10-2 test, HFA 24-2/30-2 test, and macular OCT. A convolutional neural network (CNN) DL model was trained to predict threshold sensitivity (TH) values in HFA 10-2 from retinal thickness measured by macular OCT. The predicted TH values was modified by pattern-based regularization (PBR) and corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. Absolute error (AE) of mean TH values and mean absolute error (MAE) of TH values were compared between the CNN-PBR alone model and the CNN-PBR corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. RESULTS: AE of mean TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with HFA 24-2/30-2 correction than in the CNN-PBR alone (1.9dB vs. 2.6dB; P = 0.006). MAE of TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with correction compared to the CNN-PBR alone (4.2dB vs. 5.3 dB; P < 0.001). The inferior temporal quadrant showed lower prediction errors compared with other quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a DL model to predict 10-2 VF from macular OCT was improved by the correction with HFA 24-2/30-2. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This model can reduce the burden of additional HFA 10-2 by making the best use of routinely performed HFA 24-2/30-2 and macular OCT. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8626848/ /pubmed/34812893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.13.28 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Hashimoto, Yohei Kiwaki, Taichi Sugiura, Hiroki Asano, Shotaro Murata, Hiroshi Fujino, Yuri Matsuura, Masato Miki, Atsuya Mori, Kazuhiko Ikeda, Yoko Kanamoto, Takashi Yamagami, Junkichi Inoue, Kenji Tanito, Masaki Yamanishi, Kenji Asaoka, Ryo Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field |
title | Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field |
title_full | Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field |
title_fullStr | Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field |
title_short | Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field |
title_sort | predicting 10-2 visual field from optical coherence tomography in glaucoma using deep learning corrected with 24-2/30-2 visual field |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34812893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.13.28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hashimotoyohei predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT kiwakitaichi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT sugiurahiroki predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT asanoshotaro predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT muratahiroshi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT fujinoyuri predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT matsuuramasato predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT mikiatsuya predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT morikazuhiko predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT ikedayoko predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT kanamototakashi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT yamagamijunkichi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT inouekenji predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT tanitomasaki predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT yamanishikenji predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield AT asaokaryo predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield |