Cargando…

Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a correction based on a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) can improve the prediction performance of a deep learning model to predict the HFA 10-2 VF test from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. METHODS: This is a multicent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashimoto, Yohei, Kiwaki, Taichi, Sugiura, Hiroki, Asano, Shotaro, Murata, Hiroshi, Fujino, Yuri, Matsuura, Masato, Miki, Atsuya, Mori, Kazuhiko, Ikeda, Yoko, Kanamoto, Takashi, Yamagami, Junkichi, Inoue, Kenji, Tanito, Masaki, Yamanishi, Kenji, Asaoka, Ryo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34812893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.13.28
_version_ 1784606737798529024
author Hashimoto, Yohei
Kiwaki, Taichi
Sugiura, Hiroki
Asano, Shotaro
Murata, Hiroshi
Fujino, Yuri
Matsuura, Masato
Miki, Atsuya
Mori, Kazuhiko
Ikeda, Yoko
Kanamoto, Takashi
Yamagami, Junkichi
Inoue, Kenji
Tanito, Masaki
Yamanishi, Kenji
Asaoka, Ryo
author_facet Hashimoto, Yohei
Kiwaki, Taichi
Sugiura, Hiroki
Asano, Shotaro
Murata, Hiroshi
Fujino, Yuri
Matsuura, Masato
Miki, Atsuya
Mori, Kazuhiko
Ikeda, Yoko
Kanamoto, Takashi
Yamagami, Junkichi
Inoue, Kenji
Tanito, Masaki
Yamanishi, Kenji
Asaoka, Ryo
author_sort Hashimoto, Yohei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate whether a correction based on a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) can improve the prediction performance of a deep learning model to predict the HFA 10-2 VF test from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. METHODS: This is a multicenter, cross-sectional study. The training dataset comprised 493 eyes of 285 subjects (407, open-angle glaucoma [OAG]; 86, normative) who underwent HFA 10-2 testing and macular OCT. The independent testing dataset comprised 104 OAG eyes of 82 subjects who had undergone HFA 10-2 test, HFA 24-2/30-2 test, and macular OCT. A convolutional neural network (CNN) DL model was trained to predict threshold sensitivity (TH) values in HFA 10-2 from retinal thickness measured by macular OCT. The predicted TH values was modified by pattern-based regularization (PBR) and corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. Absolute error (AE) of mean TH values and mean absolute error (MAE) of TH values were compared between the CNN-PBR alone model and the CNN-PBR corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. RESULTS: AE of mean TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with HFA 24-2/30-2 correction than in the CNN-PBR alone (1.9dB vs. 2.6dB; P = 0.006). MAE of TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with correction compared to the CNN-PBR alone (4.2dB vs. 5.3 dB; P < 0.001). The inferior temporal quadrant showed lower prediction errors compared with other quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a DL model to predict 10-2 VF from macular OCT was improved by the correction with HFA 24-2/30-2. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This model can reduce the burden of additional HFA 10-2 by making the best use of routinely performed HFA 24-2/30-2 and macular OCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86268482021-12-09 Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field Hashimoto, Yohei Kiwaki, Taichi Sugiura, Hiroki Asano, Shotaro Murata, Hiroshi Fujino, Yuri Matsuura, Masato Miki, Atsuya Mori, Kazuhiko Ikeda, Yoko Kanamoto, Takashi Yamagami, Junkichi Inoue, Kenji Tanito, Masaki Yamanishi, Kenji Asaoka, Ryo Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To investigate whether a correction based on a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) can improve the prediction performance of a deep learning model to predict the HFA 10-2 VF test from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. METHODS: This is a multicenter, cross-sectional study. The training dataset comprised 493 eyes of 285 subjects (407, open-angle glaucoma [OAG]; 86, normative) who underwent HFA 10-2 testing and macular OCT. The independent testing dataset comprised 104 OAG eyes of 82 subjects who had undergone HFA 10-2 test, HFA 24-2/30-2 test, and macular OCT. A convolutional neural network (CNN) DL model was trained to predict threshold sensitivity (TH) values in HFA 10-2 from retinal thickness measured by macular OCT. The predicted TH values was modified by pattern-based regularization (PBR) and corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. Absolute error (AE) of mean TH values and mean absolute error (MAE) of TH values were compared between the CNN-PBR alone model and the CNN-PBR corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. RESULTS: AE of mean TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with HFA 24-2/30-2 correction than in the CNN-PBR alone (1.9dB vs. 2.6dB; P = 0.006). MAE of TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with correction compared to the CNN-PBR alone (4.2dB vs. 5.3 dB; P < 0.001). The inferior temporal quadrant showed lower prediction errors compared with other quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a DL model to predict 10-2 VF from macular OCT was improved by the correction with HFA 24-2/30-2. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This model can reduce the burden of additional HFA 10-2 by making the best use of routinely performed HFA 24-2/30-2 and macular OCT. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8626848/ /pubmed/34812893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.13.28 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Hashimoto, Yohei
Kiwaki, Taichi
Sugiura, Hiroki
Asano, Shotaro
Murata, Hiroshi
Fujino, Yuri
Matsuura, Masato
Miki, Atsuya
Mori, Kazuhiko
Ikeda, Yoko
Kanamoto, Takashi
Yamagami, Junkichi
Inoue, Kenji
Tanito, Masaki
Yamanishi, Kenji
Asaoka, Ryo
Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field
title Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field
title_full Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field
title_fullStr Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field
title_full_unstemmed Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field
title_short Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field
title_sort predicting 10-2 visual field from optical coherence tomography in glaucoma using deep learning corrected with 24-2/30-2 visual field
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34812893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.13.28
work_keys_str_mv AT hashimotoyohei predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT kiwakitaichi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT sugiurahiroki predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT asanoshotaro predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT muratahiroshi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT fujinoyuri predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT matsuuramasato predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT mikiatsuya predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT morikazuhiko predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT ikedayoko predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT kanamototakashi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT yamagamijunkichi predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT inouekenji predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT tanitomasaki predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT yamanishikenji predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield
AT asaokaryo predicting102visualfieldfromopticalcoherencetomographyinglaucomausingdeeplearningcorrectedwith242302visualfield