Cargando…

The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania

BACKGROUND: Wild boar (Sus scrofa) is a widely distributed ungulate whose success can be attributed to a variety of ecological features. The genetic variation and population structure of Lithuania’s wild boar population have not yet been thoroughly studied. The purposes of this study were to investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griciuvienė, Loreta, Janeliūnas, Žygimantas, Jurgelevičius, Vaclovas, Paulauskas, Algimantas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-021-01008-8
_version_ 1784606747462205440
author Griciuvienė, Loreta
Janeliūnas, Žygimantas
Jurgelevičius, Vaclovas
Paulauskas, Algimantas
author_facet Griciuvienė, Loreta
Janeliūnas, Žygimantas
Jurgelevičius, Vaclovas
Paulauskas, Algimantas
author_sort Griciuvienė, Loreta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wild boar (Sus scrofa) is a widely distributed ungulate whose success can be attributed to a variety of ecological features. The genetic variation and population structure of Lithuania’s wild boar population have not yet been thoroughly studied. The purposes of this study were to investigate the genetic diversity of S. scrofa and assess the effects of habitat fragmentation on the population structure of wild boar in Lithuania. A total of 96 S. scrofa individuals collected from different regions of Lithuania were genotyped using fifteen microsatellite loci. RESULTS: The microsatellite analysis of the wild boars indicated high levels of genetic diversity within the population. Microsatellite markers showed evidence of a single panmictic wild boar population in Lithuania according to STRUCTURE’s highest average likelihood, which was K = 1. This was supported by pairwise F(st) values and AMOVA, which indicated no differentiation between the four sampling areas. The results of the Mantel test revealed a weak isolation by distance and geographic diversity gradients that persisted between locations. Motorway fencing and heavy traffic were not an effective barrier to wild boar movement. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited evidence of population genetic structure among the wild boar, supporting the presence of a single population across the study area and indicating that there may be no barriers hindering wild boar dispersal across the landscape. The widespread wild boar population in Lithuania, the high level of genetic variation observed within subpopulations, and the low level of variation identified between subpopulations suggest migration and gene flow between locations. The results of this study should provide valuable information in future for understanding and comparing the detailed structure of wild boar population in Lithuania following the outbreak of African swine fever. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12863-021-01008-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86269012021-11-29 The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania Griciuvienė, Loreta Janeliūnas, Žygimantas Jurgelevičius, Vaclovas Paulauskas, Algimantas BMC Genom Data Research Article BACKGROUND: Wild boar (Sus scrofa) is a widely distributed ungulate whose success can be attributed to a variety of ecological features. The genetic variation and population structure of Lithuania’s wild boar population have not yet been thoroughly studied. The purposes of this study were to investigate the genetic diversity of S. scrofa and assess the effects of habitat fragmentation on the population structure of wild boar in Lithuania. A total of 96 S. scrofa individuals collected from different regions of Lithuania were genotyped using fifteen microsatellite loci. RESULTS: The microsatellite analysis of the wild boars indicated high levels of genetic diversity within the population. Microsatellite markers showed evidence of a single panmictic wild boar population in Lithuania according to STRUCTURE’s highest average likelihood, which was K = 1. This was supported by pairwise F(st) values and AMOVA, which indicated no differentiation between the four sampling areas. The results of the Mantel test revealed a weak isolation by distance and geographic diversity gradients that persisted between locations. Motorway fencing and heavy traffic were not an effective barrier to wild boar movement. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited evidence of population genetic structure among the wild boar, supporting the presence of a single population across the study area and indicating that there may be no barriers hindering wild boar dispersal across the landscape. The widespread wild boar population in Lithuania, the high level of genetic variation observed within subpopulations, and the low level of variation identified between subpopulations suggest migration and gene flow between locations. The results of this study should provide valuable information in future for understanding and comparing the detailed structure of wild boar population in Lithuania following the outbreak of African swine fever. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12863-021-01008-8. BioMed Central 2021-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8626901/ /pubmed/34837959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-021-01008-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Griciuvienė, Loreta
Janeliūnas, Žygimantas
Jurgelevičius, Vaclovas
Paulauskas, Algimantas
The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania
title The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania
title_full The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania
title_fullStr The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania
title_full_unstemmed The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania
title_short The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania
title_sort effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (sus scrofa) population in lithuania
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-021-01008-8
work_keys_str_mv AT griciuvieneloreta theeffectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania
AT janeliunaszygimantas theeffectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania
AT jurgeleviciusvaclovas theeffectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania
AT paulauskasalgimantas theeffectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania
AT griciuvieneloreta effectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania
AT janeliunaszygimantas effectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania
AT jurgeleviciusvaclovas effectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania
AT paulauskasalgimantas effectsofhabitatfragmentationonthegeneticstructureofwildboarsusscrofapopulationinlithuania