Cargando…
Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices
BACKGROUND/AIM: Low-cost commercial bCPAP devices have been deployed in resource-limited settings to treat neonatal respiratory failure. The use of these devices has increased access to pediatric respiratory support for infants. However, constrained resources may result in substitution of recommende...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-03006-2 |
_version_ | 1784606774934896640 |
---|---|
author | Ettinger, Nicholas A. Serazin, Nathan Nguyen, Richard Werdenberg, Jennifer Huibers, Minke Torrey, Susan |
author_facet | Ettinger, Nicholas A. Serazin, Nathan Nguyen, Richard Werdenberg, Jennifer Huibers, Minke Torrey, Susan |
author_sort | Ettinger, Nicholas A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: Low-cost commercial bCPAP devices have been deployed in resource-limited settings to treat neonatal respiratory failure. The use of these devices has increased access to pediatric respiratory support for infants. However, constrained resources may result in substitution of recommended consumables and/or use in older age groups. We hypothesized that commercially available bCPAP devices, the standard WHO-style device and various improvised adaptations would all generate effective, safe positive pressure at the patient interface. METHODS: Performance of 2 commercially available bCPAP devices was tested against the standard WHO-style bCPAP device, as well as several improvised modifications of these devices, by measuring positive pressure delivered at the patient interface. Variables tested included different flow rates, patient interfaces and respiratory circuit tubing. RESULTS: Both commercial devices utilized according to manufacturer recommendations generated the expected positive pressure at the patient interface. When testing the recommended WHO-style bCPAP device with recommended materials as well as other improvised modifications, we found variable and potentially unpredictable generation of positive pressure at the patient interface. CONCLUSIONS: Modified or improvised bCPAP devices should be used with extreme caution as the support provided may be more or less than expected depending on respiratory tubing and flow rates employed. Our data support the effectiveness of bCPAP in newborns and young infants. But, to our knowledge, there are no bCPAP patient interfaces for older children effective with low liter flow devices. Therefore, based on these results, we recommend against using WHO-style bCPAP devices for non-infant patients with respiratory failure and instead recommend using standard oxygen therapy with nasal cannulae or face-masks, as well as early consideration of transfer to a higher level of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8627031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86270312021-11-30 Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices Ettinger, Nicholas A. Serazin, Nathan Nguyen, Richard Werdenberg, Jennifer Huibers, Minke Torrey, Susan BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND/AIM: Low-cost commercial bCPAP devices have been deployed in resource-limited settings to treat neonatal respiratory failure. The use of these devices has increased access to pediatric respiratory support for infants. However, constrained resources may result in substitution of recommended consumables and/or use in older age groups. We hypothesized that commercially available bCPAP devices, the standard WHO-style device and various improvised adaptations would all generate effective, safe positive pressure at the patient interface. METHODS: Performance of 2 commercially available bCPAP devices was tested against the standard WHO-style bCPAP device, as well as several improvised modifications of these devices, by measuring positive pressure delivered at the patient interface. Variables tested included different flow rates, patient interfaces and respiratory circuit tubing. RESULTS: Both commercial devices utilized according to manufacturer recommendations generated the expected positive pressure at the patient interface. When testing the recommended WHO-style bCPAP device with recommended materials as well as other improvised modifications, we found variable and potentially unpredictable generation of positive pressure at the patient interface. CONCLUSIONS: Modified or improvised bCPAP devices should be used with extreme caution as the support provided may be more or less than expected depending on respiratory tubing and flow rates employed. Our data support the effectiveness of bCPAP in newborns and young infants. But, to our knowledge, there are no bCPAP patient interfaces for older children effective with low liter flow devices. Therefore, based on these results, we recommend against using WHO-style bCPAP devices for non-infant patients with respiratory failure and instead recommend using standard oxygen therapy with nasal cannulae or face-masks, as well as early consideration of transfer to a higher level of care. BioMed Central 2021-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8627031/ /pubmed/34836539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-03006-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ettinger, Nicholas A. Serazin, Nathan Nguyen, Richard Werdenberg, Jennifer Huibers, Minke Torrey, Susan Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices |
title | Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices |
title_full | Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices |
title_fullStr | Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices |
title_short | Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices |
title_sort | testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and who-style pediatric bubble cpap devices |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-03006-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ettingernicholasa testingpositivepressuredeliveredfromcommercialandwhostylepediatricbubblecpapdevices AT serazinnathan testingpositivepressuredeliveredfromcommercialandwhostylepediatricbubblecpapdevices AT nguyenrichard testingpositivepressuredeliveredfromcommercialandwhostylepediatricbubblecpapdevices AT werdenbergjennifer testingpositivepressuredeliveredfromcommercialandwhostylepediatricbubblecpapdevices AT huibersminke testingpositivepressuredeliveredfromcommercialandwhostylepediatricbubblecpapdevices AT torreysusan testingpositivepressuredeliveredfromcommercialandwhostylepediatricbubblecpapdevices |