Cargando…

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review

INTRODUCTION: Several published systematic reviews have examined the potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking, but their methodological and/or reporting quality have not yet been assessed. This systematic quality review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Mimi M., Pound, Lynley, Steffensen, Isabella, Curtin, Geoffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34838030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00570-9
_version_ 1784606775909023744
author Kim, Mimi M.
Pound, Lynley
Steffensen, Isabella
Curtin, Geoffrey M.
author_facet Kim, Mimi M.
Pound, Lynley
Steffensen, Isabella
Curtin, Geoffrey M.
author_sort Kim, Mimi M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several published systematic reviews have examined the potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking, but their methodological and/or reporting quality have not yet been assessed. This systematic quality review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) 2 to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews investigating potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from 01 January 2007 to 24 June 2020. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and reporting quality was assessed using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Of 331 potentially relevant systematic reviews, 20 met predefined inclusion criteria. Most reviews (n = 15; 75%) reported on e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking cessation, while three reported on e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking initiation (15%); and two reported on cigarette smoking initiation and cessation (10%). According to AMSTAR 2 guidelines, 18 of the 20 reviews (90%) were “critically low” in overall confidence of the results, while two were ranked “low.” Additionally, reporting quality varied across the reviews, with only 60% reporting at least half of the PRISMA items. DISCUSSION: Methodological limitations were identified across reviews examining potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors, indicating that findings from these reviews should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Future systematic reviews in this field should strive to adhere to AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA guidelines, to provide high quality syntheses of the available data with transparent and complete reporting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-021-00570-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8627036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86270362021-11-30 Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review Kim, Mimi M. Pound, Lynley Steffensen, Isabella Curtin, Geoffrey M. Harm Reduct J Review INTRODUCTION: Several published systematic reviews have examined the potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking, but their methodological and/or reporting quality have not yet been assessed. This systematic quality review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) 2 to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews investigating potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from 01 January 2007 to 24 June 2020. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and reporting quality was assessed using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Of 331 potentially relevant systematic reviews, 20 met predefined inclusion criteria. Most reviews (n = 15; 75%) reported on e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking cessation, while three reported on e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking initiation (15%); and two reported on cigarette smoking initiation and cessation (10%). According to AMSTAR 2 guidelines, 18 of the 20 reviews (90%) were “critically low” in overall confidence of the results, while two were ranked “low.” Additionally, reporting quality varied across the reviews, with only 60% reporting at least half of the PRISMA items. DISCUSSION: Methodological limitations were identified across reviews examining potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors, indicating that findings from these reviews should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Future systematic reviews in this field should strive to adhere to AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA guidelines, to provide high quality syntheses of the available data with transparent and complete reporting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-021-00570-9. BioMed Central 2021-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8627036/ /pubmed/34838030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00570-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Kim, Mimi M.
Pound, Lynley
Steffensen, Isabella
Curtin, Geoffrey M.
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review
title Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review
title_full Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review
title_fullStr Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review
title_full_unstemmed Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review
title_short Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review
title_sort reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34838030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00570-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmimim reportingandmethodologicalqualityofsystematicliteraturereviewsevaluatingtheassociationsbetweenecigaretteuseandcigarettesmokingbehaviorsasystematicqualityreview
AT poundlynley reportingandmethodologicalqualityofsystematicliteraturereviewsevaluatingtheassociationsbetweenecigaretteuseandcigarettesmokingbehaviorsasystematicqualityreview
AT steffensenisabella reportingandmethodologicalqualityofsystematicliteraturereviewsevaluatingtheassociationsbetweenecigaretteuseandcigarettesmokingbehaviorsasystematicqualityreview
AT curtingeoffreym reportingandmethodologicalqualityofsystematicliteraturereviewsevaluatingtheassociationsbetweenecigaretteuseandcigarettesmokingbehaviorsasystematicqualityreview