Cargando…
Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34839446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8 |
_version_ | 1784606823546880000 |
---|---|
author | Biswas, A. Harbin, S. Irvin, E. Johnston, H. Begum, M. Tiong, M. Apedaile, D. Koehoorn, M. Smith, P. |
author_facet | Biswas, A. Harbin, S. Irvin, E. Johnston, H. Begum, M. Tiong, M. Apedaile, D. Koehoorn, M. Smith, P. |
author_sort | Biswas, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational hazards between men and women, across occupations, and within the same occupation. RECENT FINDINGS: Fifty-eight studies retrieved from eight databases met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies were found on physical hazards, 38 studies on psychological/psychosocial hazards, 5 studies on biological hazards, and 17 studies on chemical hazards. The majority of studies reported that men were exposed to noise, vibration, medical radiation, physically demanding work, solar radiation, falls, biomechanical risks, chemical hazards, and blood contamination; while women were exposed to wet work, bullying and discrimination, work stress, and biological agents. Within the same occupations, men were more likely to be exposed to physical hazards, with the exception of women in health care occupations and exposure to prolonged standing. Women compared to men in the same occupations were more likely to experience harassment, while men compared to women in the same occupations reported higher work stress. Men reported more exposure to hazardous chemicals in the same occupations as women. SUMMARY: The review suggests that men and women have different exposures to occupational hazards and that these differences are not solely due to a gendered distribution of the labor force by occupation. Findings may inform prevention efforts seeking to reduce gender inequalities in occupational health. Future research is needed to explain the reasons for sex/gender inequality differences in exposures within the same occupation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8627292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86272922021-11-29 Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature Biswas, A. Harbin, S. Irvin, E. Johnston, H. Begum, M. Tiong, M. Apedaile, D. Koehoorn, M. Smith, P. Curr Environ Health Rep Occupational Health (K Applebaum and M Friesen, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational hazards between men and women, across occupations, and within the same occupation. RECENT FINDINGS: Fifty-eight studies retrieved from eight databases met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies were found on physical hazards, 38 studies on psychological/psychosocial hazards, 5 studies on biological hazards, and 17 studies on chemical hazards. The majority of studies reported that men were exposed to noise, vibration, medical radiation, physically demanding work, solar radiation, falls, biomechanical risks, chemical hazards, and blood contamination; while women were exposed to wet work, bullying and discrimination, work stress, and biological agents. Within the same occupations, men were more likely to be exposed to physical hazards, with the exception of women in health care occupations and exposure to prolonged standing. Women compared to men in the same occupations were more likely to experience harassment, while men compared to women in the same occupations reported higher work stress. Men reported more exposure to hazardous chemicals in the same occupations as women. SUMMARY: The review suggests that men and women have different exposures to occupational hazards and that these differences are not solely due to a gendered distribution of the labor force by occupation. Findings may inform prevention efforts seeking to reduce gender inequalities in occupational health. Future research is needed to explain the reasons for sex/gender inequality differences in exposures within the same occupation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8627292/ /pubmed/34839446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Occupational Health (K Applebaum and M Friesen, Section Editors) Biswas, A. Harbin, S. Irvin, E. Johnston, H. Begum, M. Tiong, M. Apedaile, D. Koehoorn, M. Smith, P. Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature |
title | Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature |
title_full | Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature |
title_fullStr | Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature |
title_short | Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature |
title_sort | sex and gender differences in occupational hazard exposures: a scoping review of the recent literature |
topic | Occupational Health (K Applebaum and M Friesen, Section Editors) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34839446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biswasa sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT harbins sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT irvine sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT johnstonh sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT begumm sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT tiongm sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT apedailed sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT koehoornm sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature AT smithp sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature |