Cargando…

Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biswas, A., Harbin, S., Irvin, E., Johnston, H., Begum, M., Tiong, M., Apedaile, D., Koehoorn, M., Smith, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34839446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8
_version_ 1784606823546880000
author Biswas, A.
Harbin, S.
Irvin, E.
Johnston, H.
Begum, M.
Tiong, M.
Apedaile, D.
Koehoorn, M.
Smith, P.
author_facet Biswas, A.
Harbin, S.
Irvin, E.
Johnston, H.
Begum, M.
Tiong, M.
Apedaile, D.
Koehoorn, M.
Smith, P.
author_sort Biswas, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational hazards between men and women, across occupations, and within the same occupation. RECENT FINDINGS: Fifty-eight studies retrieved from eight databases met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies were found on physical hazards, 38 studies on psychological/psychosocial hazards, 5 studies on biological hazards, and 17 studies on chemical hazards. The majority of studies reported that men were exposed to noise, vibration, medical radiation, physically demanding work, solar radiation, falls, biomechanical risks, chemical hazards, and blood contamination; while women were exposed to wet work, bullying and discrimination, work stress, and biological agents. Within the same occupations, men were more likely to be exposed to physical hazards, with the exception of women in health care occupations and exposure to prolonged standing. Women compared to men in the same occupations were more likely to experience harassment, while men compared to women in the same occupations reported higher work stress. Men reported more exposure to hazardous chemicals in the same occupations as women. SUMMARY: The review suggests that men and women have different exposures to occupational hazards and that these differences are not solely due to a gendered distribution of the labor force by occupation. Findings may inform prevention efforts seeking to reduce gender inequalities in occupational health. Future research is needed to explain the reasons for sex/gender inequality differences in exposures within the same occupation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8627292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86272922021-11-29 Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature Biswas, A. Harbin, S. Irvin, E. Johnston, H. Begum, M. Tiong, M. Apedaile, D. Koehoorn, M. Smith, P. Curr Environ Health Rep Occupational Health (K Applebaum and M Friesen, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational hazards between men and women, across occupations, and within the same occupation. RECENT FINDINGS: Fifty-eight studies retrieved from eight databases met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies were found on physical hazards, 38 studies on psychological/psychosocial hazards, 5 studies on biological hazards, and 17 studies on chemical hazards. The majority of studies reported that men were exposed to noise, vibration, medical radiation, physically demanding work, solar radiation, falls, biomechanical risks, chemical hazards, and blood contamination; while women were exposed to wet work, bullying and discrimination, work stress, and biological agents. Within the same occupations, men were more likely to be exposed to physical hazards, with the exception of women in health care occupations and exposure to prolonged standing. Women compared to men in the same occupations were more likely to experience harassment, while men compared to women in the same occupations reported higher work stress. Men reported more exposure to hazardous chemicals in the same occupations as women. SUMMARY: The review suggests that men and women have different exposures to occupational hazards and that these differences are not solely due to a gendered distribution of the labor force by occupation. Findings may inform prevention efforts seeking to reduce gender inequalities in occupational health. Future research is needed to explain the reasons for sex/gender inequality differences in exposures within the same occupation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8627292/ /pubmed/34839446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Occupational Health (K Applebaum and M Friesen, Section Editors)
Biswas, A.
Harbin, S.
Irvin, E.
Johnston, H.
Begum, M.
Tiong, M.
Apedaile, D.
Koehoorn, M.
Smith, P.
Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
title Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
title_full Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
title_fullStr Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
title_full_unstemmed Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
title_short Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
title_sort sex and gender differences in occupational hazard exposures: a scoping review of the recent literature
topic Occupational Health (K Applebaum and M Friesen, Section Editors)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34839446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8
work_keys_str_mv AT biswasa sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT harbins sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT irvine sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT johnstonh sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT begumm sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT tiongm sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT apedailed sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT koehoornm sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature
AT smithp sexandgenderdifferencesinoccupationalhazardexposuresascopingreviewoftherecentliterature