Cargando…
Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is developing living, evidence-based, national guidelines for treatment of people with COVID-19. These living guidelines are updated each week. We undertook an impact evaluation to understand the extent to which h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34852274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.035 |
_version_ | 1784606864893280256 |
---|---|
author | Millard, Tanya Elliott, Julian H. Green, Sally Tendal, Britta Vogel, Joshua P. Norris, Sarah Tate, Rhiannon Turner, Tari |
author_facet | Millard, Tanya Elliott, Julian H. Green, Sally Tendal, Britta Vogel, Joshua P. Norris, Sarah Tate, Rhiannon Turner, Tari |
author_sort | Millard, Tanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is developing living, evidence-based, national guidelines for treatment of people with COVID-19. These living guidelines are updated each week. We undertook an impact evaluation to understand the extent to which health professionals providing treatment to people with COVID 19 were aware of, valued and used the guidelines, and the factors that enabled or hampered this. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used for the evaluation. Surveys were conducted to collect both quantitative and qualitative data and were supplemented with qualitative interviews. Australian healthcare practitioners potentially providing care to individuals with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were invited to participate. Data were collected on guideline awareness, relevance, ease of use, trustworthiness, value, importance of updating, use, and strengths and opportunities for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 287 people completed the surveys and 10 interviews were conducted during November 2020. Awareness of the work of the Taskforce was high and the vast majority of respondents reported that the guidelines were very or extremely relevant, easy to use, trustworthy and valuable. More than 50% of respondents had used the guidelines to support their own clinical decision-making; and 30% were aware of other examples of the guidelines being used. Qualitative data revealed that amongst an overwhelming morass of evidence and opinions during the COVID-19 pandemic, the guidelines have been a reliable, united source of evidence-based advice; participants felt the guidelines built confidence and provided reassurance in clinical decision-making. Opportunities to improve awareness and accessibility to the guidelines were also explored. CONCLUSIONS: As of June 2021, the guidelines have been published and updated more than 40 times, include more than 140 recommendations and are being used to inform clinical decisions. The findings of this impact evaluation will be used to improve processes and outputs of the Taskforce and guidelines project, and to inform future living guideline projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8627590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86275902021-11-29 Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation Millard, Tanya Elliott, Julian H. Green, Sally Tendal, Britta Vogel, Joshua P. Norris, Sarah Tate, Rhiannon Turner, Tari J Clin Epidemiol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is developing living, evidence-based, national guidelines for treatment of people with COVID-19. These living guidelines are updated each week. We undertook an impact evaluation to understand the extent to which health professionals providing treatment to people with COVID 19 were aware of, valued and used the guidelines, and the factors that enabled or hampered this. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used for the evaluation. Surveys were conducted to collect both quantitative and qualitative data and were supplemented with qualitative interviews. Australian healthcare practitioners potentially providing care to individuals with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were invited to participate. Data were collected on guideline awareness, relevance, ease of use, trustworthiness, value, importance of updating, use, and strengths and opportunities for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 287 people completed the surveys and 10 interviews were conducted during November 2020. Awareness of the work of the Taskforce was high and the vast majority of respondents reported that the guidelines were very or extremely relevant, easy to use, trustworthy and valuable. More than 50% of respondents had used the guidelines to support their own clinical decision-making; and 30% were aware of other examples of the guidelines being used. Qualitative data revealed that amongst an overwhelming morass of evidence and opinions during the COVID-19 pandemic, the guidelines have been a reliable, united source of evidence-based advice; participants felt the guidelines built confidence and provided reassurance in clinical decision-making. Opportunities to improve awareness and accessibility to the guidelines were also explored. CONCLUSIONS: As of June 2021, the guidelines have been published and updated more than 40 times, include more than 140 recommendations and are being used to inform clinical decisions. The findings of this impact evaluation will be used to improve processes and outputs of the Taskforce and guidelines project, and to inform future living guideline projects. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-03 2021-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8627590/ /pubmed/34852274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.035 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Millard, Tanya Elliott, Julian H. Green, Sally Tendal, Britta Vogel, Joshua P. Norris, Sarah Tate, Rhiannon Turner, Tari Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation |
title | Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation |
title_full | Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation |
title_fullStr | Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation |
title_short | Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation |
title_sort | awareness, value and use of the australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with covid-19: an impact evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34852274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millardtanya awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT elliottjulianh awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT greensally awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT tendalbritta awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT vogeljoshuap awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT norrissarah awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT taterhiannon awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT turnertari awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation AT awarenessvalueanduseoftheaustralianlivingguidelinesfortheclinicalcareofpeoplewithcovid19animpactevaluation |