Cargando…
Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews
BACKGROUND: AMSTAR-2 (‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2’) and ROBIS (‘Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews’) are independent instruments used to assess the quality of conduct of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs). The degree of overlap in methodological constructs toge...
Autores principales: | Swierz, Mateusz J., Storman, Dawid, Zajac, Joanna, Koperny, Magdalena, Weglarz, Paulina, Staskiewicz, Wojciech, Gorecka, Magdalena, Skuza, Anna, Wach, Adam, Kaluzinska, Klaudia, Bochenek-Cibor, Justyna, Johnston, Bradley C., Bala, Malgorzata M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01457-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention
por: Storman, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Are systematic reviews addressing nutrition for cancer prevention trustworthy? A systematic survey of quality and risk of bias
por: Zajac, Joanna F, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Support for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients—a Systematic Review
por: Bochenek-Cibor, Justyna, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)