Cargando…

The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) status is an important prognostic factor that strongly influences the treatment decision of early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to evaluate the pattern and clinical significance of LNM in EGC. METHODS: A total of 354 patients with carcinoma in situ (n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yanzhang, Wu, Guanghua, Li, Zhihao, Zhou, Zhixiong, Wang, Zhao, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09008-8
_version_ 1784606869157838848
author Yanzhang, Wu
Guanghua, Li
Zhihao, Zhou
Zhixiong, Wang
Zhao, Wang
author_facet Yanzhang, Wu
Guanghua, Li
Zhihao, Zhou
Zhixiong, Wang
Zhao, Wang
author_sort Yanzhang, Wu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) status is an important prognostic factor that strongly influences the treatment decision of early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to evaluate the pattern and clinical significance of LNM in EGC. METHODS: A total of 354 patients with carcinoma in situ (n = 42), EGC (n = 312) who underwent radical gastrectomy were enrolled. Their clinicopathological features, pathological reports, and prognostic data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of LNM in all patients was 18.36% (65/354). The rates of D1 and D2 station metastases were 12.10% (43/354) and 6.21% (22/354), respectively. The rates of LNM in absolute indication of endoscopic resection and expanded indication were 3.27% (2/61) and 28.55% (4/14), respectively. Skip LNM was observed in 3.67% (13/354) of patients. For those with middle-third tumor, the metastasis rate of the No. 5 lymph node was 3.05% (5/164). The independent risk factors for LNM were tumors measuring > 30 mm, poorly differentiated tumors, and lymphovascular invasion (all P < 0.05; area under the curve, 0.783). The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with and without LNM were 96.26 and 79.17%, respectively (P = 0.011). Tumors measuring > 20 mm and LNM were independent predictive factors for poor survival outcome in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EGC conforming to expanded indications have a relatively high risk of LNM and may not be suitable for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for patients with middle-third EGC remains controversial due to the high metastasis rate of the No. 5 lymph node.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8627613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86276132021-11-30 The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study Yanzhang, Wu Guanghua, Li Zhihao, Zhou Zhixiong, Wang Zhao, Wang BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) status is an important prognostic factor that strongly influences the treatment decision of early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to evaluate the pattern and clinical significance of LNM in EGC. METHODS: A total of 354 patients with carcinoma in situ (n = 42), EGC (n = 312) who underwent radical gastrectomy were enrolled. Their clinicopathological features, pathological reports, and prognostic data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of LNM in all patients was 18.36% (65/354). The rates of D1 and D2 station metastases were 12.10% (43/354) and 6.21% (22/354), respectively. The rates of LNM in absolute indication of endoscopic resection and expanded indication were 3.27% (2/61) and 28.55% (4/14), respectively. Skip LNM was observed in 3.67% (13/354) of patients. For those with middle-third tumor, the metastasis rate of the No. 5 lymph node was 3.05% (5/164). The independent risk factors for LNM were tumors measuring > 30 mm, poorly differentiated tumors, and lymphovascular invasion (all P < 0.05; area under the curve, 0.783). The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with and without LNM were 96.26 and 79.17%, respectively (P = 0.011). Tumors measuring > 20 mm and LNM were independent predictive factors for poor survival outcome in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EGC conforming to expanded indications have a relatively high risk of LNM and may not be suitable for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for patients with middle-third EGC remains controversial due to the high metastasis rate of the No. 5 lymph node. BioMed Central 2021-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8627613/ /pubmed/34837993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09008-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yanzhang, Wu
Guanghua, Li
Zhihao, Zhou
Zhixiong, Wang
Zhao, Wang
The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study
title The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study
title_full The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study
title_fullStr The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study
title_short The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study
title_sort risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09008-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yanzhangwu theriskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT guanghuali theriskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhihaozhou theriskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhixiongwang theriskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhaowang theriskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT yanzhangwu riskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT guanghuali riskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhihaozhou riskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhixiongwang riskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhaowang riskoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerconformingtoindicationsofendoscopicresectionandpyloruspreservinggastrectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy