Cargando…

Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Missing outcome data can lead to bias in the results of systematic reviews. One way to address missing outcome data is by requesting the data from the trial authors, but non-response is common. One way to potentially improve response rates is by sending study participants advance communi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woolf, Benjamin, Edwards, Phil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01462-z
_version_ 1784606870814588928
author Woolf, Benjamin
Edwards, Phil
author_facet Woolf, Benjamin
Edwards, Phil
author_sort Woolf, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Missing outcome data can lead to bias in the results of systematic reviews. One way to address missing outcome data is by requesting the data from the trial authors, but non-response is common. One way to potentially improve response rates is by sending study participants advance communication. During the update of a systematic review examining the effect of pre-notification on response rates, study authors needed to be contacted for further information. This study was nested within the systematic review by randomising authors to receive a notification of the upcoming request for information. The objective was to test if pre-notification increased response rates. METHODS: The participants were study authors included in the systematic review, whose studies were at unclear risk of bias. The intervention was a pre-notification of the request for further information, sent 1 day before the request. The outcome was defined as the proportion of authors who responded to the request for information. Authors were randomised by simple randomisation. Thirty three authors were randomised to the pre-notification arm, and 42 were randomised to the control arm. Authors were blinded to the possibility of an alternative condition. RESULTS: All authors randomised were analysed. 14/33 (42.4%) authors in the pre-notification arm had returned responses to the questionnaire, and 18/42 (42.9%) in the control arm. There was no evidence of a difference between these groups (absolute difference = − 0.5, 95% CI (− 23.4 to 22.5%), p = 1). We received no complaints about receiving the pre-notification. CONCLUSIONS: This study’s results do not support the hypothesis that pre-notification increases response from study authors being contacted for a request for more information. However, the study has a low power, and the results may not generalise to other contexts, methods of administering a pre-notification, or study populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration and protocol: This trial is not registered with any trial registry. However, the protocol was posted in advance on the Open Science Framework website and is available on the Open Science Framework website: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/MSV2W or https://osf.io/msv2w/ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01462-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8627620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86276202021-11-30 Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review Woolf, Benjamin Edwards, Phil BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Missing outcome data can lead to bias in the results of systematic reviews. One way to address missing outcome data is by requesting the data from the trial authors, but non-response is common. One way to potentially improve response rates is by sending study participants advance communication. During the update of a systematic review examining the effect of pre-notification on response rates, study authors needed to be contacted for further information. This study was nested within the systematic review by randomising authors to receive a notification of the upcoming request for information. The objective was to test if pre-notification increased response rates. METHODS: The participants were study authors included in the systematic review, whose studies were at unclear risk of bias. The intervention was a pre-notification of the request for further information, sent 1 day before the request. The outcome was defined as the proportion of authors who responded to the request for information. Authors were randomised by simple randomisation. Thirty three authors were randomised to the pre-notification arm, and 42 were randomised to the control arm. Authors were blinded to the possibility of an alternative condition. RESULTS: All authors randomised were analysed. 14/33 (42.4%) authors in the pre-notification arm had returned responses to the questionnaire, and 18/42 (42.9%) in the control arm. There was no evidence of a difference between these groups (absolute difference = − 0.5, 95% CI (− 23.4 to 22.5%), p = 1). We received no complaints about receiving the pre-notification. CONCLUSIONS: This study’s results do not support the hypothesis that pre-notification increases response from study authors being contacted for a request for more information. However, the study has a low power, and the results may not generalise to other contexts, methods of administering a pre-notification, or study populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration and protocol: This trial is not registered with any trial registry. However, the protocol was posted in advance on the Open Science Framework website and is available on the Open Science Framework website: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/MSV2W or https://osf.io/msv2w/ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01462-z. BioMed Central 2021-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8627620/ /pubmed/34837937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01462-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Woolf, Benjamin
Edwards, Phil
Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
title Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
title_full Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
title_fullStr Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
title_short Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
title_sort does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01462-z
work_keys_str_mv AT woolfbenjamin doesprenotificationincreasequestionnaireresponseratesarandomisedcontrolledtrialnestedwithinasystematicreview
AT edwardsphil doesprenotificationincreasequestionnaireresponseratesarandomisedcontrolledtrialnestedwithinasystematicreview