Cargando…

Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant

Transport crates for poultry can contribute to the spread of pathogens, with those of public health interest, for example, Campylobacter, being of particular importance. A strict cleaning procedure and use of an effective disinfection method for transport equipment are thus important to avoid introd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dzieciolowski, T., Boqvist, S., Rydén, J., Hansson, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101521
_version_ 1784606924755435520
author Dzieciolowski, T.
Boqvist, S.
Rydén, J.
Hansson, I.
author_facet Dzieciolowski, T.
Boqvist, S.
Rydén, J.
Hansson, I.
author_sort Dzieciolowski, T.
collection PubMed
description Transport crates for poultry can contribute to the spread of pathogens, with those of public health interest, for example, Campylobacter, being of particular importance. A strict cleaning procedure and use of an effective disinfection method for transport equipment are thus important to avoid introduction of Campylobacter to chicken and poultry farms, particularly during flock thinning. This study evaluated the efficacy of the disinfection procedure currently in use at one of the largest slaughter plants in Sweden and compared the effects with those of other disinfection methods. The evaluation was based on treatment ability to reduce the presence and amount of indicator bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae and total aerobic bacteria. In 4 trials, sodium hypochlorite, peracetic acid, and drying with hot air, with or without sodium hypochlorite for final disinfection, were compared. The analysis was based on 40 cotton swab samples taken in each treatment, 20 after the soaking stage and 20 after the final disinfection step. The results showed that use of a chemical disinfectant in combination with drying with hot air (dehumidifier) was the most effective treatment, with an average reduction of 3.4 log for total aerobic bacteria and 3.8 log for Enterobacteriaceae. Since all crates treated with hot air were dry, transport conditions for the birds also improved, particularly in cold weather. A disadvantage is that this treatment is energy-consuming and would require substantial technical changes to the current cleaning process, increasing operating costs at the slaughter plant. However, considering the contribution of improved crate cleaning to overall hygiene control within the poultry supply chain and the beneficial effect on animal welfare, the costs may be justified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8627975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86279752021-12-06 Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant Dzieciolowski, T. Boqvist, S. Rydén, J. Hansson, I. Poult Sci PROCESSING AND PRODUCT Transport crates for poultry can contribute to the spread of pathogens, with those of public health interest, for example, Campylobacter, being of particular importance. A strict cleaning procedure and use of an effective disinfection method for transport equipment are thus important to avoid introduction of Campylobacter to chicken and poultry farms, particularly during flock thinning. This study evaluated the efficacy of the disinfection procedure currently in use at one of the largest slaughter plants in Sweden and compared the effects with those of other disinfection methods. The evaluation was based on treatment ability to reduce the presence and amount of indicator bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae and total aerobic bacteria. In 4 trials, sodium hypochlorite, peracetic acid, and drying with hot air, with or without sodium hypochlorite for final disinfection, were compared. The analysis was based on 40 cotton swab samples taken in each treatment, 20 after the soaking stage and 20 after the final disinfection step. The results showed that use of a chemical disinfectant in combination with drying with hot air (dehumidifier) was the most effective treatment, with an average reduction of 3.4 log for total aerobic bacteria and 3.8 log for Enterobacteriaceae. Since all crates treated with hot air were dry, transport conditions for the birds also improved, particularly in cold weather. A disadvantage is that this treatment is energy-consuming and would require substantial technical changes to the current cleaning process, increasing operating costs at the slaughter plant. However, considering the contribution of improved crate cleaning to overall hygiene control within the poultry supply chain and the beneficial effect on animal welfare, the costs may be justified. Elsevier 2021-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8627975/ /pubmed/34823182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101521 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle PROCESSING AND PRODUCT
Dzieciolowski, T.
Boqvist, S.
Rydén, J.
Hansson, I.
Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant
title Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant
title_full Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant
title_fullStr Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant
title_full_unstemmed Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant
title_short Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant
title_sort cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry – comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant
topic PROCESSING AND PRODUCT
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101521
work_keys_str_mv AT dzieciolowskit cleaninganddisinfectionoftransportcratesforpoultrycomparisonoffourtreatmentsatslaughterplant
AT boqvists cleaninganddisinfectionoftransportcratesforpoultrycomparisonoffourtreatmentsatslaughterplant
AT rydenj cleaninganddisinfectionoftransportcratesforpoultrycomparisonoffourtreatmentsatslaughterplant
AT hanssoni cleaninganddisinfectionoftransportcratesforpoultrycomparisonoffourtreatmentsatslaughterplant