Cargando…

The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review

This study aimed to systematically review the current literature on studies using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or dressings following fracture-related infection (FRI) in internal osteosynthesis of the extremity. Articles were analyzed on fracture and wound healing and included when compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Niels Martin, Steenstrup, Signe, Ravn, Christen, Schmal, Hagen, Viberg, Bjarke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101710
_version_ 1784606929061937152
author Jensen, Niels Martin
Steenstrup, Signe
Ravn, Christen
Schmal, Hagen
Viberg, Bjarke
author_facet Jensen, Niels Martin
Steenstrup, Signe
Ravn, Christen
Schmal, Hagen
Viberg, Bjarke
author_sort Jensen, Niels Martin
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to systematically review the current literature on studies using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or dressings following fracture-related infection (FRI) in internal osteosynthesis of the extremity. Articles were analyzed on fracture and wound healing and included when comparing or describing the use of either NPWT or dressings in FRI. We conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases: Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The studies were screened by two authors using Covidence.org and evaluated for risk of bias. A total of 8576 records were identified. No articles compared NPWT to dressings. Seven case reports and three case series included a total of 115 patients treated for FRI. Fracture healing was achieved in 21 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT (4 amputations and 46 not described) and all 48 patients in the dressing group (4 patients needed additional sequestrectomy procedures). Five studies did not describe fracture healing. In 57 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT, the wounds were described as healed, closed, or requiring soft tissue reconstruction (4 amputations and six lacking description). The dressing group had complete wound coverage in 18 patients and partial coverage in 30 patients. Studies were generally at high risk of bias because of insufficient descriptions of both patient demographics and outcomes. No studies compared NPWT to dressings, and the existing literature is at high risk of bias. The included studies were of low-level evidence. NPWT can be neither recommended nor advised against to cover infected osteosynthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8627993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86279932022-11-17 The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review Jensen, Niels Martin Steenstrup, Signe Ravn, Christen Schmal, Hagen Viberg, Bjarke J Clin Orthop Trauma Review Article This study aimed to systematically review the current literature on studies using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or dressings following fracture-related infection (FRI) in internal osteosynthesis of the extremity. Articles were analyzed on fracture and wound healing and included when comparing or describing the use of either NPWT or dressings in FRI. We conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases: Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The studies were screened by two authors using Covidence.org and evaluated for risk of bias. A total of 8576 records were identified. No articles compared NPWT to dressings. Seven case reports and three case series included a total of 115 patients treated for FRI. Fracture healing was achieved in 21 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT (4 amputations and 46 not described) and all 48 patients in the dressing group (4 patients needed additional sequestrectomy procedures). Five studies did not describe fracture healing. In 57 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT, the wounds were described as healed, closed, or requiring soft tissue reconstruction (4 amputations and six lacking description). The dressing group had complete wound coverage in 18 patients and partial coverage in 30 patients. Studies were generally at high risk of bias because of insufficient descriptions of both patient demographics and outcomes. No studies compared NPWT to dressings, and the existing literature is at high risk of bias. The included studies were of low-level evidence. NPWT can be neither recommended nor advised against to cover infected osteosynthesis. Elsevier 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8627993/ /pubmed/34881170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101710 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Jensen, Niels Martin
Steenstrup, Signe
Ravn, Christen
Schmal, Hagen
Viberg, Bjarke
The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review
title The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review
title_full The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review
title_fullStr The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review
title_short The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review
title_sort use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101710
work_keys_str_mv AT jensennielsmartin theuseofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT steenstrupsigne theuseofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT ravnchristen theuseofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT schmalhagen theuseofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT vibergbjarke theuseofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT jensennielsmartin useofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT steenstrupsigne useofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT ravnchristen useofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT schmalhagen useofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview
AT vibergbjarke useofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforfracturerelatedinfectionsfollowinginternalosteosynthesisoftheextremityasystematicreview