Cargando…
Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical efficacy of a hybrid Greulich-Pyle (GP) and modified Tanner-Whitehouse (TW) artificial intelligence (AI) model for bone age assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A deep learning-based model was trained on an open dataset of multiple ethnicities. A total...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34668353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1468 |
_version_ | 1784606961323474944 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kyu-Chong Lee, Kee-Hyoung Kang, Chang Ho Ahn, Kyung-Sik Chung, Lindsey Yoojin Lee, Jae-Joon Hong, Suk Joo Kim, Baek Hyun Shim, Euddeum |
author_facet | Lee, Kyu-Chong Lee, Kee-Hyoung Kang, Chang Ho Ahn, Kyung-Sik Chung, Lindsey Yoojin Lee, Jae-Joon Hong, Suk Joo Kim, Baek Hyun Shim, Euddeum |
author_sort | Lee, Kyu-Chong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical efficacy of a hybrid Greulich-Pyle (GP) and modified Tanner-Whitehouse (TW) artificial intelligence (AI) model for bone age assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A deep learning-based model was trained on an open dataset of multiple ethnicities. A total of 102 hand radiographs (51 male and 51 female; mean age ± standard deviation = 10.95 ± 2.37 years) from a single institution were selected for external validation. Three human experts performed bone age assessments based on the GP atlas to develop a reference standard. Two study radiologists performed bone age assessments with and without AI model assistance in two separate sessions, for which the reading time was recorded. The performance of the AI software was assessed by comparing the mean absolute difference between the AI-calculated bone age and the reference standard. The reading time was compared between reading with and without AI using a paired t test. Furthermore, the reliability between the two study radiologists' bone age assessments was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and the results were compared between reading with and without AI. RESULTS: The bone ages assessed by the experts and the AI model were not significantly different (11.39 ± 2.74 years and 11.35 ± 2.76 years, respectively, p = 0.31). The mean absolute difference was 0.39 years (95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.45 years) between the automated AI assessment and the reference standard. The mean reading time of the two study radiologists was reduced from 54.29 to 35.37 seconds with AI model assistance (p < 0.001). The ICC of the two study radiologists slightly increased with AI model assistance (from 0.945 to 0.990). CONCLUSION: The proposed AI model was accurate for assessing bone age. Furthermore, this model appeared to enhance the clinical efficacy by reducing the reading time and improving the inter-observer reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8628149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86281492021-12-07 Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment Lee, Kyu-Chong Lee, Kee-Hyoung Kang, Chang Ho Ahn, Kyung-Sik Chung, Lindsey Yoojin Lee, Jae-Joon Hong, Suk Joo Kim, Baek Hyun Shim, Euddeum Korean J Radiol Musculoskeletal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical efficacy of a hybrid Greulich-Pyle (GP) and modified Tanner-Whitehouse (TW) artificial intelligence (AI) model for bone age assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A deep learning-based model was trained on an open dataset of multiple ethnicities. A total of 102 hand radiographs (51 male and 51 female; mean age ± standard deviation = 10.95 ± 2.37 years) from a single institution were selected for external validation. Three human experts performed bone age assessments based on the GP atlas to develop a reference standard. Two study radiologists performed bone age assessments with and without AI model assistance in two separate sessions, for which the reading time was recorded. The performance of the AI software was assessed by comparing the mean absolute difference between the AI-calculated bone age and the reference standard. The reading time was compared between reading with and without AI using a paired t test. Furthermore, the reliability between the two study radiologists' bone age assessments was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and the results were compared between reading with and without AI. RESULTS: The bone ages assessed by the experts and the AI model were not significantly different (11.39 ± 2.74 years and 11.35 ± 2.76 years, respectively, p = 0.31). The mean absolute difference was 0.39 years (95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.45 years) between the automated AI assessment and the reference standard. The mean reading time of the two study radiologists was reduced from 54.29 to 35.37 seconds with AI model assistance (p < 0.001). The ICC of the two study radiologists slightly increased with AI model assistance (from 0.945 to 0.990). CONCLUSION: The proposed AI model was accurate for assessing bone age. Furthermore, this model appeared to enhance the clinical efficacy by reducing the reading time and improving the inter-observer reliability. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-12 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8628149/ /pubmed/34668353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1468 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Musculoskeletal Imaging Lee, Kyu-Chong Lee, Kee-Hyoung Kang, Chang Ho Ahn, Kyung-Sik Chung, Lindsey Yoojin Lee, Jae-Joon Hong, Suk Joo Kim, Baek Hyun Shim, Euddeum Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment |
title | Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment |
title_full | Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment |
title_fullStr | Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment |
title_short | Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Hybrid (Greulich-Pyle and Modified Tanner-Whitehouse) Method for Bone Age Assessment |
title_sort | clinical validation of a deep learning-based hybrid (greulich-pyle and modified tanner-whitehouse) method for bone age assessment |
topic | Musculoskeletal Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34668353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1468 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekyuchong clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT leekeehyoung clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT kangchangho clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT ahnkyungsik clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT chunglindseyyoojin clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT leejaejoon clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT hongsukjoo clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT kimbaekhyun clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment AT shimeuddeum clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningbasedhybridgreulichpyleandmodifiedtannerwhitehousemethodforboneageassessment |