Cargando…
Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Flatfoot is characterised by the falling of the medial longitudinal arch, eversion of the hindfoot and abduction of the loaded forefoot. Furthermore, flatfoot leads to a variety of musculoskeletal symptoms in the lower extremity, such as knee or hip pain. The standard conservative treatm...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z |
_version_ | 1784606997529755648 |
---|---|
author | Herchenröder, Minettchen Wilfling, Denise Steinhäuser, Jost |
author_facet | Herchenröder, Minettchen Wilfling, Denise Steinhäuser, Jost |
author_sort | Herchenröder, Minettchen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flatfoot is characterised by the falling of the medial longitudinal arch, eversion of the hindfoot and abduction of the loaded forefoot. Furthermore, flatfoot leads to a variety of musculoskeletal symptoms in the lower extremity, such as knee or hip pain. The standard conservative treatment for flatfoot deformity is exercise therapy or treatment with foot orthoses. Foot orthoses are prescribed for various foot complaints. However, the evidence for the provision of foot orthoses is inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence of foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot. METHODS: A computerized search was conducted in August 2021, using the databases PubMed, Scopus, Pedro, Cochrane Library, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Intervention studies of any design investigating the effects of foot orthoses were included, apart from case studies. Two independent reviewers assessed all search results to identify eligible studies and to assess their methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies were identified through the database search. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. These studies investigated prefabricated and custom-made foot orthoses, evaluating stance and plantar pressure during gait. The sample sizes of the identified studies ranged from 8 to 80. In most of the studies, the methodological quality was low and a lack of information was frequently detected. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of evidence on the effect of foot orthoses for flatfoot in adults. This review illustrates the importance of conducting randomized controlled trials and the comprehensive development of guidelines for the prescription of foot orthoses. Given the weak evidence available, the common prescription of foot orthoses is somewhat surprising. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8628393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86283932021-12-01 Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review Herchenröder, Minettchen Wilfling, Denise Steinhäuser, Jost J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: Flatfoot is characterised by the falling of the medial longitudinal arch, eversion of the hindfoot and abduction of the loaded forefoot. Furthermore, flatfoot leads to a variety of musculoskeletal symptoms in the lower extremity, such as knee or hip pain. The standard conservative treatment for flatfoot deformity is exercise therapy or treatment with foot orthoses. Foot orthoses are prescribed for various foot complaints. However, the evidence for the provision of foot orthoses is inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence of foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot. METHODS: A computerized search was conducted in August 2021, using the databases PubMed, Scopus, Pedro, Cochrane Library, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Intervention studies of any design investigating the effects of foot orthoses were included, apart from case studies. Two independent reviewers assessed all search results to identify eligible studies and to assess their methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies were identified through the database search. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. These studies investigated prefabricated and custom-made foot orthoses, evaluating stance and plantar pressure during gait. The sample sizes of the identified studies ranged from 8 to 80. In most of the studies, the methodological quality was low and a lack of information was frequently detected. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of evidence on the effect of foot orthoses for flatfoot in adults. This review illustrates the importance of conducting randomized controlled trials and the comprehensive development of guidelines for the prescription of foot orthoses. Given the weak evidence available, the common prescription of foot orthoses is somewhat surprising. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z. BioMed Central 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8628393/ /pubmed/34844639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Herchenröder, Minettchen Wilfling, Denise Steinhäuser, Jost Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review |
title | Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review |
title_full | Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review |
title_short | Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review |
title_sort | evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herchenroderminettchen evidenceforfootorthosesforadultswithflatfootasystematicreview AT wilflingdenise evidenceforfootorthosesforadultswithflatfootasystematicreview AT steinhauserjost evidenceforfootorthosesforadultswithflatfootasystematicreview |