Cargando…

Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Flatfoot is characterised by the falling of the medial longitudinal arch, eversion of the hindfoot and abduction of the loaded forefoot. Furthermore, flatfoot leads to a variety of musculoskeletal symptoms in the lower extremity, such as knee or hip pain. The standard conservative treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herchenröder, Minettchen, Wilfling, Denise, Steinhäuser, Jost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z
_version_ 1784606997529755648
author Herchenröder, Minettchen
Wilfling, Denise
Steinhäuser, Jost
author_facet Herchenröder, Minettchen
Wilfling, Denise
Steinhäuser, Jost
author_sort Herchenröder, Minettchen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flatfoot is characterised by the falling of the medial longitudinal arch, eversion of the hindfoot and abduction of the loaded forefoot. Furthermore, flatfoot leads to a variety of musculoskeletal symptoms in the lower extremity, such as knee or hip pain. The standard conservative treatment for flatfoot deformity is exercise therapy or treatment with foot orthoses. Foot orthoses are prescribed for various foot complaints. However, the evidence for the provision of foot orthoses is inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence of foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot. METHODS: A computerized search was conducted in August 2021, using the databases PubMed, Scopus, Pedro, Cochrane Library, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Intervention studies of any design investigating the effects of foot orthoses were included, apart from case studies. Two independent reviewers assessed all search results to identify eligible studies and to assess their methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies were identified through the database search. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. These studies investigated prefabricated and custom-made foot orthoses, evaluating stance and plantar pressure during gait. The sample sizes of the identified studies ranged from 8 to 80. In most of the studies, the methodological quality was low and a lack of information was frequently detected. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of evidence on the effect of foot orthoses for flatfoot in adults. This review illustrates the importance of conducting randomized controlled trials and the comprehensive development of guidelines for the prescription of foot orthoses. Given the weak evidence available, the common prescription of foot orthoses is somewhat surprising. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8628393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86283932021-12-01 Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review Herchenröder, Minettchen Wilfling, Denise Steinhäuser, Jost J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: Flatfoot is characterised by the falling of the medial longitudinal arch, eversion of the hindfoot and abduction of the loaded forefoot. Furthermore, flatfoot leads to a variety of musculoskeletal symptoms in the lower extremity, such as knee or hip pain. The standard conservative treatment for flatfoot deformity is exercise therapy or treatment with foot orthoses. Foot orthoses are prescribed for various foot complaints. However, the evidence for the provision of foot orthoses is inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence of foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot. METHODS: A computerized search was conducted in August 2021, using the databases PubMed, Scopus, Pedro, Cochrane Library, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Intervention studies of any design investigating the effects of foot orthoses were included, apart from case studies. Two independent reviewers assessed all search results to identify eligible studies and to assess their methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies were identified through the database search. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. These studies investigated prefabricated and custom-made foot orthoses, evaluating stance and plantar pressure during gait. The sample sizes of the identified studies ranged from 8 to 80. In most of the studies, the methodological quality was low and a lack of information was frequently detected. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of evidence on the effect of foot orthoses for flatfoot in adults. This review illustrates the importance of conducting randomized controlled trials and the comprehensive development of guidelines for the prescription of foot orthoses. Given the weak evidence available, the common prescription of foot orthoses is somewhat surprising. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z. BioMed Central 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8628393/ /pubmed/34844639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Herchenröder, Minettchen
Wilfling, Denise
Steinhäuser, Jost
Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
title Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
title_full Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
title_fullStr Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
title_short Evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
title_sort evidence for foot orthoses for adults with flatfoot: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00499-z
work_keys_str_mv AT herchenroderminettchen evidenceforfootorthosesforadultswithflatfootasystematicreview
AT wilflingdenise evidenceforfootorthosesforadultswithflatfootasystematicreview
AT steinhauserjost evidenceforfootorthosesforadultswithflatfootasystematicreview