Cargando…

Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model

BACKGROUND: Effective screening can prevent cervical cancer, but many women choose not to attend their screening tests. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate behavioural influences on cervical screening participation using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM‐B models of behaviour ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Donovan, Bernadine, Mooney, Therese, Rimmer, Ben, Fitzpatrick, Patricia, Flannelly, Grainne, Doherty, Lorraine, Martin, Cara, O'Leary, John, O'Connor, Mairead, Sharp, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13346
_version_ 1784607026825920512
author O'Donovan, Bernadine
Mooney, Therese
Rimmer, Ben
Fitzpatrick, Patricia
Flannelly, Grainne
Doherty, Lorraine
Martin, Cara
O'Leary, John
O'Connor, Mairead
Sharp, Linda
author_facet O'Donovan, Bernadine
Mooney, Therese
Rimmer, Ben
Fitzpatrick, Patricia
Flannelly, Grainne
Doherty, Lorraine
Martin, Cara
O'Leary, John
O'Connor, Mairead
Sharp, Linda
author_sort O'Donovan, Bernadine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective screening can prevent cervical cancer, but many women choose not to attend their screening tests. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate behavioural influences on cervical screening participation using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM‐B models of behaviour change. DESIGN: A qualitative study and semistructured phone interviews were conducted with women invited for routine screening tests within the national cervical screening programme in Ireland. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Forty‐eight women aged 25–65 years were recruited from the national screening register. RESULTS: Seven core themes were identified that mapped to three COM‐B components and 11 TDF domains: (1) knowledge of cervical cancer and screening, (2) coping with smear tests, (3) competing motivational processes—automatic and reflective, (4) cognitive resources, (5) role of social support, (6) environmental influences and (7) perceputal and practical influences. A range of knowledge about screening, perceived risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection was evident. Factors that influenced screening behaviours may be hierarchical—some were assigned greater importance than others. Positive screening behaviours were linked to autonomous motivation. Deficits in physical and psychological capability (inadequate coping skills) were barriers to screening, while physical and social opportunity (e.g. healthcare professional ‘champions’) could facilitate participation. Older women raised age‐related issues (e.g. screening no longer necessary) and had more negative attitudes to screening, while younger women identified practical barriers. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into screening participation and will aid development of theoretically informed interventions to increase uptake. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Women invited for screening tests through the national screening programme were interviewed. A Public & Patient Involvement (PPI) Panel, established to provide input into all CERVIVA research projects, advised the research team on recruitment materials and were given the opportunity to review and comment on the interview topic guide. This panel is made up of six women with various cervical screening histories and experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8628586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86285862021-12-07 Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model O'Donovan, Bernadine Mooney, Therese Rimmer, Ben Fitzpatrick, Patricia Flannelly, Grainne Doherty, Lorraine Martin, Cara O'Leary, John O'Connor, Mairead Sharp, Linda Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: Effective screening can prevent cervical cancer, but many women choose not to attend their screening tests. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate behavioural influences on cervical screening participation using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM‐B models of behaviour change. DESIGN: A qualitative study and semistructured phone interviews were conducted with women invited for routine screening tests within the national cervical screening programme in Ireland. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Forty‐eight women aged 25–65 years were recruited from the national screening register. RESULTS: Seven core themes were identified that mapped to three COM‐B components and 11 TDF domains: (1) knowledge of cervical cancer and screening, (2) coping with smear tests, (3) competing motivational processes—automatic and reflective, (4) cognitive resources, (5) role of social support, (6) environmental influences and (7) perceputal and practical influences. A range of knowledge about screening, perceived risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection was evident. Factors that influenced screening behaviours may be hierarchical—some were assigned greater importance than others. Positive screening behaviours were linked to autonomous motivation. Deficits in physical and psychological capability (inadequate coping skills) were barriers to screening, while physical and social opportunity (e.g. healthcare professional ‘champions’) could facilitate participation. Older women raised age‐related issues (e.g. screening no longer necessary) and had more negative attitudes to screening, while younger women identified practical barriers. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into screening participation and will aid development of theoretically informed interventions to increase uptake. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Women invited for screening tests through the national screening programme were interviewed. A Public & Patient Involvement (PPI) Panel, established to provide input into all CERVIVA research projects, advised the research team on recruitment materials and were given the opportunity to review and comment on the interview topic guide. This panel is made up of six women with various cervical screening histories and experiences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-02 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8628586/ /pubmed/34476875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13346 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
O'Donovan, Bernadine
Mooney, Therese
Rimmer, Ben
Fitzpatrick, Patricia
Flannelly, Grainne
Doherty, Lorraine
Martin, Cara
O'Leary, John
O'Connor, Mairead
Sharp, Linda
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
title Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
title_full Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
title_fullStr Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
title_full_unstemmed Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
title_short Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
title_sort advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the com‐b model
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13346
work_keys_str_mv AT odonovanbernadine advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT mooneytherese advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT rimmerben advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT fitzpatrickpatricia advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT flannellygrainne advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT dohertylorraine advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT martincara advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT olearyjohn advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT oconnormairead advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel
AT sharplinda advancingunderstandingofinfluencesoncervicalscreeningnonparticipationamongyoungerandolderwomenaqualitativestudyusingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthecombmodel