Cargando…
Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade
Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366 |
_version_ | 1784607047151517696 |
---|---|
author | Lagree, Andrew Shiner, Audrey Alera, Marie Angeli Fleshner, Lauren Law, Ethan Law, Brianna Lu, Fang-I Dodington, David Gandhi, Sonal Slodkowska, Elzbieta A. Shenfield, Alex Jerzak, Katarzyna J. Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William T. |
author_facet | Lagree, Andrew Shiner, Audrey Alera, Marie Angeli Fleshner, Lauren Law, Ethan Law, Brianna Lu, Fang-I Dodington, David Gandhi, Sonal Slodkowska, Elzbieta A. Shenfield, Alex Jerzak, Katarzyna J. Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William T. |
author_sort | Lagree, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for grading tumors using artificial intelligence. Methods: There were 138 patients included in this retrospective study. Breast core biopsy slides were prepared using standard laboratory techniques, digitized, and pre-processed for analysis. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to identify the regions of interest containing malignant cells and to segment tumor nuclei. Imaging-based features associated with spatial parameters were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs). Clinical datasets and pathologic biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2) were collected from all study subjects. Pathologic, clinical, and imaging-based features were input into machine learning (ML) models to classify histologic grade, and model performances were tested against ground-truth labels at the patient-level. Classification performances were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Multiparametric feature sets, containing both clinical and imaging-based features, demonstrated high classification performance. Using imaging-derived markers alone, the classification performance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, while modeling these features with other pathologic biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.836. Conclusion: These results demonstrate an association between tumor nuclear spatial features and tumor grade. If further validated, these systems may be implemented into pathology CADs and can assist pathologists to expeditiously grade tumors at the time of diagnosis and to help guide clinical decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8628688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86286882021-11-30 Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade Lagree, Andrew Shiner, Audrey Alera, Marie Angeli Fleshner, Lauren Law, Ethan Law, Brianna Lu, Fang-I Dodington, David Gandhi, Sonal Slodkowska, Elzbieta A. Shenfield, Alex Jerzak, Katarzyna J. Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William T. Curr Oncol Article Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for grading tumors using artificial intelligence. Methods: There were 138 patients included in this retrospective study. Breast core biopsy slides were prepared using standard laboratory techniques, digitized, and pre-processed for analysis. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to identify the regions of interest containing malignant cells and to segment tumor nuclei. Imaging-based features associated with spatial parameters were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs). Clinical datasets and pathologic biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2) were collected from all study subjects. Pathologic, clinical, and imaging-based features were input into machine learning (ML) models to classify histologic grade, and model performances were tested against ground-truth labels at the patient-level. Classification performances were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Multiparametric feature sets, containing both clinical and imaging-based features, demonstrated high classification performance. Using imaging-derived markers alone, the classification performance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, while modeling these features with other pathologic biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.836. Conclusion: These results demonstrate an association between tumor nuclear spatial features and tumor grade. If further validated, these systems may be implemented into pathology CADs and can assist pathologists to expeditiously grade tumors at the time of diagnosis and to help guide clinical decisions. MDPI 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8628688/ /pubmed/34898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lagree, Andrew Shiner, Audrey Alera, Marie Angeli Fleshner, Lauren Law, Ethan Law, Brianna Lu, Fang-I Dodington, David Gandhi, Sonal Slodkowska, Elzbieta A. Shenfield, Alex Jerzak, Katarzyna J. Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William T. Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade |
title | Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade |
title_full | Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade |
title_short | Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade |
title_sort | assessment of digital pathology imaging biomarkers associated with breast cancer histologic grade |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lagreeandrew assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT shineraudrey assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT aleramarieangeli assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT fleshnerlauren assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT lawethan assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT lawbrianna assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT lufangi assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT dodingtondavid assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT gandhisonal assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT slodkowskaelzbietaa assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT shenfieldalex assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT jerzakkatarzynaj assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT sadeghinainiali assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade AT tranwilliamt assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade |