Cargando…

Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade

Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lagree, Andrew, Shiner, Audrey, Alera, Marie Angeli, Fleshner, Lauren, Law, Ethan, Law, Brianna, Lu, Fang-I, Dodington, David, Gandhi, Sonal, Slodkowska, Elzbieta A., Shenfield, Alex, Jerzak, Katarzyna J., Sadeghi-Naini, Ali, Tran, William T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898544
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366
_version_ 1784607047151517696
author Lagree, Andrew
Shiner, Audrey
Alera, Marie Angeli
Fleshner, Lauren
Law, Ethan
Law, Brianna
Lu, Fang-I
Dodington, David
Gandhi, Sonal
Slodkowska, Elzbieta A.
Shenfield, Alex
Jerzak, Katarzyna J.
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Tran, William T.
author_facet Lagree, Andrew
Shiner, Audrey
Alera, Marie Angeli
Fleshner, Lauren
Law, Ethan
Law, Brianna
Lu, Fang-I
Dodington, David
Gandhi, Sonal
Slodkowska, Elzbieta A.
Shenfield, Alex
Jerzak, Katarzyna J.
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Tran, William T.
author_sort Lagree, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for grading tumors using artificial intelligence. Methods: There were 138 patients included in this retrospective study. Breast core biopsy slides were prepared using standard laboratory techniques, digitized, and pre-processed for analysis. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to identify the regions of interest containing malignant cells and to segment tumor nuclei. Imaging-based features associated with spatial parameters were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs). Clinical datasets and pathologic biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2) were collected from all study subjects. Pathologic, clinical, and imaging-based features were input into machine learning (ML) models to classify histologic grade, and model performances were tested against ground-truth labels at the patient-level. Classification performances were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Multiparametric feature sets, containing both clinical and imaging-based features, demonstrated high classification performance. Using imaging-derived markers alone, the classification performance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, while modeling these features with other pathologic biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.836. Conclusion: These results demonstrate an association between tumor nuclear spatial features and tumor grade. If further validated, these systems may be implemented into pathology CADs and can assist pathologists to expeditiously grade tumors at the time of diagnosis and to help guide clinical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8628688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86286882021-11-30 Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade Lagree, Andrew Shiner, Audrey Alera, Marie Angeli Fleshner, Lauren Law, Ethan Law, Brianna Lu, Fang-I Dodington, David Gandhi, Sonal Slodkowska, Elzbieta A. Shenfield, Alex Jerzak, Katarzyna J. Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William T. Curr Oncol Article Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for grading tumors using artificial intelligence. Methods: There were 138 patients included in this retrospective study. Breast core biopsy slides were prepared using standard laboratory techniques, digitized, and pre-processed for analysis. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to identify the regions of interest containing malignant cells and to segment tumor nuclei. Imaging-based features associated with spatial parameters were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs). Clinical datasets and pathologic biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2) were collected from all study subjects. Pathologic, clinical, and imaging-based features were input into machine learning (ML) models to classify histologic grade, and model performances were tested against ground-truth labels at the patient-level. Classification performances were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Multiparametric feature sets, containing both clinical and imaging-based features, demonstrated high classification performance. Using imaging-derived markers alone, the classification performance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, while modeling these features with other pathologic biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.836. Conclusion: These results demonstrate an association between tumor nuclear spatial features and tumor grade. If further validated, these systems may be implemented into pathology CADs and can assist pathologists to expeditiously grade tumors at the time of diagnosis and to help guide clinical decisions. MDPI 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8628688/ /pubmed/34898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lagree, Andrew
Shiner, Audrey
Alera, Marie Angeli
Fleshner, Lauren
Law, Ethan
Law, Brianna
Lu, Fang-I
Dodington, David
Gandhi, Sonal
Slodkowska, Elzbieta A.
Shenfield, Alex
Jerzak, Katarzyna J.
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Tran, William T.
Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade
title Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade
title_full Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade
title_fullStr Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade
title_short Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade
title_sort assessment of digital pathology imaging biomarkers associated with breast cancer histologic grade
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898544
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366
work_keys_str_mv AT lagreeandrew assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT shineraudrey assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT aleramarieangeli assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT fleshnerlauren assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT lawethan assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT lawbrianna assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT lufangi assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT dodingtondavid assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT gandhisonal assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT slodkowskaelzbietaa assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT shenfieldalex assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT jerzakkatarzynaj assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT sadeghinainiali assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade
AT tranwilliamt assessmentofdigitalpathologyimagingbiomarkersassociatedwithbreastcancerhistologicgrade