Cargando…

Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges

Classic homocystinuria (HCU) was added to newborn screening (NBS) by Robert Guthrie a few years after the disorder was first described. The justification for NBS was similar to that for PKU, that presymptomatic identification and early dietary treatment would prevent the clinical consequences, which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Levy, Harvey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7040067
_version_ 1784607104429981696
author Levy, Harvey L.
author_facet Levy, Harvey L.
author_sort Levy, Harvey L.
collection PubMed
description Classic homocystinuria (HCU) was added to newborn screening (NBS) by Robert Guthrie a few years after the disorder was first described. The justification for NBS was similar to that for PKU, that presymptomatic identification and early dietary treatment would prevent the clinical consequences, which, for HCU, are mental deficiency, ectopia lentis, skeletal abnormalities, and thromboembolism. It was assumed that identifying increased methionine in the screening blood specimen would identify all affected neonates. However, it is now clear that many with HCU are missed by NBS, mainly because the methionine level in the first days of life is normal or below the cutoff level in the NBS program. This includes virtually all of those with B(6)-responsive HCU. Thus, a more effective method of NBS for HCU should be considered. Included among the possibilities are decreasing the methionine cutoff level, requiring an increase in the Met/Phe ratio if the methionine level is not at or greater than the cutoff level, using methionine as the primary screen with homocysteine as a second-tier test, or replacing methionine with homocysteine as the primary screen. Homocysteine is the primary metabolite that increases in HCU, while the methionine increase is secondary, so homocysteine is usually increased before the increase in methionine, almost always during the first few days of life. Finally, targeted gene screening might be considered. All of these possibilities would impose added expense and labor to NBS, so meeting these challenges would likely require a regional or national effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8628950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86289502021-11-30 Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges Levy, Harvey L. Int J Neonatal Screen Review Classic homocystinuria (HCU) was added to newborn screening (NBS) by Robert Guthrie a few years after the disorder was first described. The justification for NBS was similar to that for PKU, that presymptomatic identification and early dietary treatment would prevent the clinical consequences, which, for HCU, are mental deficiency, ectopia lentis, skeletal abnormalities, and thromboembolism. It was assumed that identifying increased methionine in the screening blood specimen would identify all affected neonates. However, it is now clear that many with HCU are missed by NBS, mainly because the methionine level in the first days of life is normal or below the cutoff level in the NBS program. This includes virtually all of those with B(6)-responsive HCU. Thus, a more effective method of NBS for HCU should be considered. Included among the possibilities are decreasing the methionine cutoff level, requiring an increase in the Met/Phe ratio if the methionine level is not at or greater than the cutoff level, using methionine as the primary screen with homocysteine as a second-tier test, or replacing methionine with homocysteine as the primary screen. Homocysteine is the primary metabolite that increases in HCU, while the methionine increase is secondary, so homocysteine is usually increased before the increase in methionine, almost always during the first few days of life. Finally, targeted gene screening might be considered. All of these possibilities would impose added expense and labor to NBS, so meeting these challenges would likely require a regional or national effort. MDPI 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8628950/ /pubmed/34842599 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7040067 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Levy, Harvey L.
Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges
title Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges
title_full Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges
title_fullStr Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges
title_short Early Development of Newborn Screening for HCU and Current Challenges
title_sort early development of newborn screening for hcu and current challenges
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7040067
work_keys_str_mv AT levyharveyl earlydevelopmentofnewbornscreeningforhcuandcurrentchallenges