Cargando…
Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of eliminating a preprocedural planning computed tomography during CT-guided bone marrow biopsy on the technical aspects of the procedure, including patient dose, sample quality, procedure time, and CT fluoroscopy usage. Retrospective analysis of 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography7040062 |
_version_ | 1784607105369505792 |
---|---|
author | Devita, Robert Chagarlamudi, Kaushik Durieux, Jared Jordan, David Nguyen, Brian Davidson, Jon Kosaraju, Vijaya Abboud, Salim |
author_facet | Devita, Robert Chagarlamudi, Kaushik Durieux, Jared Jordan, David Nguyen, Brian Davidson, Jon Kosaraju, Vijaya Abboud, Salim |
author_sort | Devita, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of eliminating a preprocedural planning computed tomography during CT-guided bone marrow biopsy on the technical aspects of the procedure, including patient dose, sample quality, procedure time, and CT fluoroscopy usage. Retrospective analysis of 109 patients between 1 June 2018 and 1 January 2021 was performed. Patients were grouped based on whether they received a planning CT scan. Relative radiation exposure was measured using dose-length product (DLP). Secondary metrics included number of CT fluoroscopic acquisitions until target localization, total number of CT fluoroscopic acquisitions, biopsy diagnostic yield, and procedure time. A total of 43 bone marrow biopsies with planning CT scans (Group 1) and 66 bone marrow biopsies without planning CT scans (Group 2) were performed. The average total DLP for Group 1 and Group 2 was 268.73 mGy*cm and 50.92 mGy*cm, respectively. The mean radiation dose reduction between the groups was 81% (p < 0.0001). Significantly more CT fluoroscopy acquisitions were needed for needle localization in Group 2 than Group 1 (p < 0.0001). Total number of CT fluoroscopy acquisitions was four for Group 1 and eight for Group 2 (p = 0.0002). There was no significant difference between the groups in procedure time or diagnostic yield. Patients without a planning CT scan received more fluoroscopic CT acquisitions but overall were exposed to significantly less radiation without an increase in procedure time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8628954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86289542021-11-30 Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration Devita, Robert Chagarlamudi, Kaushik Durieux, Jared Jordan, David Nguyen, Brian Davidson, Jon Kosaraju, Vijaya Abboud, Salim Tomography Article The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of eliminating a preprocedural planning computed tomography during CT-guided bone marrow biopsy on the technical aspects of the procedure, including patient dose, sample quality, procedure time, and CT fluoroscopy usage. Retrospective analysis of 109 patients between 1 June 2018 and 1 January 2021 was performed. Patients were grouped based on whether they received a planning CT scan. Relative radiation exposure was measured using dose-length product (DLP). Secondary metrics included number of CT fluoroscopic acquisitions until target localization, total number of CT fluoroscopic acquisitions, biopsy diagnostic yield, and procedure time. A total of 43 bone marrow biopsies with planning CT scans (Group 1) and 66 bone marrow biopsies without planning CT scans (Group 2) were performed. The average total DLP for Group 1 and Group 2 was 268.73 mGy*cm and 50.92 mGy*cm, respectively. The mean radiation dose reduction between the groups was 81% (p < 0.0001). Significantly more CT fluoroscopy acquisitions were needed for needle localization in Group 2 than Group 1 (p < 0.0001). Total number of CT fluoroscopy acquisitions was four for Group 1 and eight for Group 2 (p = 0.0002). There was no significant difference between the groups in procedure time or diagnostic yield. Patients without a planning CT scan received more fluoroscopic CT acquisitions but overall were exposed to significantly less radiation without an increase in procedure time. MDPI 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8628954/ /pubmed/34842812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography7040062 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Devita, Robert Chagarlamudi, Kaushik Durieux, Jared Jordan, David Nguyen, Brian Davidson, Jon Kosaraju, Vijaya Abboud, Salim Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration |
title | Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration |
title_full | Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration |
title_fullStr | Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration |
title_full_unstemmed | Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration |
title_short | Omission of Planning CT Reduces Patient Radiation Exposure during CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration |
title_sort | omission of planning ct reduces patient radiation exposure during ct-guided bone marrow biopsy and aspiration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography7040062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devitarobert omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration AT chagarlamudikaushik omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration AT durieuxjared omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration AT jordandavid omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration AT nguyenbrian omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration AT davidsonjon omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration AT kosarajuvijaya omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration AT abboudsalim omissionofplanningctreducespatientradiationexposureduringctguidedbonemarrowbiopsyandaspiration |