Cargando…

Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) model, with its four problematic areas of grief, deficit, role transition and role dispute, provides a useful frame of reference for a quick case formulation. We aimed at applying the IPT problematic areas assessment in a sample of patients from a liaison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miniati, Mario, Palagini, Laura, Conversano, Ciro, Pardini, Francesco, Massa, Lucia, Pini, Stefano, Marazziti, Donatella, Orrù, Graziella, Cuffini, Federico, Gemignani, Angelo, Grassi, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909031
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210304
_version_ 1784607130172522496
author Miniati, Mario
Palagini, Laura
Conversano, Ciro
Pardini, Francesco
Massa, Lucia
Pini, Stefano
Marazziti, Donatella
Orrù, Graziella
Cuffini, Federico
Gemignani, Angelo
Grassi, Luigi
author_facet Miniati, Mario
Palagini, Laura
Conversano, Ciro
Pardini, Francesco
Massa, Lucia
Pini, Stefano
Marazziti, Donatella
Orrù, Graziella
Cuffini, Federico
Gemignani, Angelo
Grassi, Luigi
author_sort Miniati, Mario
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) model, with its four problematic areas of grief, deficit, role transition and role dispute, provides a useful frame of reference for a quick case formulation. We aimed at applying the IPT problematic areas assessment in a sample of patients from a liaison psychiatry setting. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-nine hospitalized patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 80 years were interviewed. The 'Interpersonal Problem Areas Rating Scale' (IPARS) was used to detect the interpersonal focuses. RESULTS: IPARS problematic areas were identified in the 76% of the sample (n=98). Grief and role transition, interpersonal deficits and role disputes were, respectively, the most frequently (43.4 and 42.6%, respectively) and the less frequently described focuses (14 and 11.6%). Moreover, 31 patients (24%) showed no problem areas related to current symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: The IPT model has proved to be an easy-to-use tool, able to guide the psychological interview and allowing the collection of information from an interpersonal perspective in a short time, although no specific focuses were detected as related to current psychological distress in around 25% of the sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8629066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86290662021-12-13 Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study Miniati, Mario Palagini, Laura Conversano, Ciro Pardini, Francesco Massa, Lucia Pini, Stefano Marazziti, Donatella Orrù, Graziella Cuffini, Federico Gemignani, Angelo Grassi, Luigi Clin Neuropsychiatry Research Article OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) model, with its four problematic areas of grief, deficit, role transition and role dispute, provides a useful frame of reference for a quick case formulation. We aimed at applying the IPT problematic areas assessment in a sample of patients from a liaison psychiatry setting. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-nine hospitalized patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 80 years were interviewed. The 'Interpersonal Problem Areas Rating Scale' (IPARS) was used to detect the interpersonal focuses. RESULTS: IPARS problematic areas were identified in the 76% of the sample (n=98). Grief and role transition, interpersonal deficits and role disputes were, respectively, the most frequently (43.4 and 42.6%, respectively) and the less frequently described focuses (14 and 11.6%). Moreover, 31 patients (24%) showed no problem areas related to current symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: The IPT model has proved to be an easy-to-use tool, able to guide the psychological interview and allowing the collection of information from an interpersonal perspective in a short time, although no specific focuses were detected as related to current psychological distress in around 25% of the sample. Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8629066/ /pubmed/34909031 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210304 Text en © 2021 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l. This is an open access article. Distribution and reproduction are permitted in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miniati, Mario
Palagini, Laura
Conversano, Ciro
Pardini, Francesco
Massa, Lucia
Pini, Stefano
Marazziti, Donatella
Orrù, Graziella
Cuffini, Federico
Gemignani, Angelo
Grassi, Luigi
Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study
title Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study
title_full Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study
title_short Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study
title_sort interpersonal problematic areas in liaison psychiatry: a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909031
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210304
work_keys_str_mv AT miniatimario interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT palaginilaura interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT conversanociro interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT pardinifrancesco interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT massalucia interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT pinistefano interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT marazzitidonatella interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT orrugraziella interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT cuffinifederico interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT gemignaniangelo interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy
AT grassiluigi interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy