Cargando…
Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study
OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) model, with its four problematic areas of grief, deficit, role transition and role dispute, provides a useful frame of reference for a quick case formulation. We aimed at applying the IPT problematic areas assessment in a sample of patients from a liaison...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909031 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210304 |
_version_ | 1784607130172522496 |
---|---|
author | Miniati, Mario Palagini, Laura Conversano, Ciro Pardini, Francesco Massa, Lucia Pini, Stefano Marazziti, Donatella Orrù, Graziella Cuffini, Federico Gemignani, Angelo Grassi, Luigi |
author_facet | Miniati, Mario Palagini, Laura Conversano, Ciro Pardini, Francesco Massa, Lucia Pini, Stefano Marazziti, Donatella Orrù, Graziella Cuffini, Federico Gemignani, Angelo Grassi, Luigi |
author_sort | Miniati, Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) model, with its four problematic areas of grief, deficit, role transition and role dispute, provides a useful frame of reference for a quick case formulation. We aimed at applying the IPT problematic areas assessment in a sample of patients from a liaison psychiatry setting. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-nine hospitalized patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 80 years were interviewed. The 'Interpersonal Problem Areas Rating Scale' (IPARS) was used to detect the interpersonal focuses. RESULTS: IPARS problematic areas were identified in the 76% of the sample (n=98). Grief and role transition, interpersonal deficits and role disputes were, respectively, the most frequently (43.4 and 42.6%, respectively) and the less frequently described focuses (14 and 11.6%). Moreover, 31 patients (24%) showed no problem areas related to current symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: The IPT model has proved to be an easy-to-use tool, able to guide the psychological interview and allowing the collection of information from an interpersonal perspective in a short time, although no specific focuses were detected as related to current psychological distress in around 25% of the sample. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8629066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86290662021-12-13 Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study Miniati, Mario Palagini, Laura Conversano, Ciro Pardini, Francesco Massa, Lucia Pini, Stefano Marazziti, Donatella Orrù, Graziella Cuffini, Federico Gemignani, Angelo Grassi, Luigi Clin Neuropsychiatry Research Article OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) model, with its four problematic areas of grief, deficit, role transition and role dispute, provides a useful frame of reference for a quick case formulation. We aimed at applying the IPT problematic areas assessment in a sample of patients from a liaison psychiatry setting. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-nine hospitalized patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 80 years were interviewed. The 'Interpersonal Problem Areas Rating Scale' (IPARS) was used to detect the interpersonal focuses. RESULTS: IPARS problematic areas were identified in the 76% of the sample (n=98). Grief and role transition, interpersonal deficits and role disputes were, respectively, the most frequently (43.4 and 42.6%, respectively) and the less frequently described focuses (14 and 11.6%). Moreover, 31 patients (24%) showed no problem areas related to current symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: The IPT model has proved to be an easy-to-use tool, able to guide the psychological interview and allowing the collection of information from an interpersonal perspective in a short time, although no specific focuses were detected as related to current psychological distress in around 25% of the sample. Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8629066/ /pubmed/34909031 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210304 Text en © 2021 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l. This is an open access article. Distribution and reproduction are permitted in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Miniati, Mario Palagini, Laura Conversano, Ciro Pardini, Francesco Massa, Lucia Pini, Stefano Marazziti, Donatella Orrù, Graziella Cuffini, Federico Gemignani, Angelo Grassi, Luigi Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study |
title | Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study |
title_full | Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study |
title_fullStr | Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study |
title_short | Interpersonal Problematic Areas in Liaison Psychiatry: A Feasibility Study |
title_sort | interpersonal problematic areas in liaison psychiatry: a feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909031 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miniatimario interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT palaginilaura interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT conversanociro interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT pardinifrancesco interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT massalucia interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT pinistefano interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT marazzitidonatella interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT orrugraziella interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT cuffinifederico interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT gemignaniangelo interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy AT grassiluigi interpersonalproblematicareasinliaisonpsychiatryafeasibilitystudy |