Cargando…

Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Effective drug treatments for Covid-19 are needed to decrease morbidity and mortality for the individual and to alleviate pressure on health care systems. Remdesivir showed promising results in early randomised trials but subsequently a large publicly funded trial has shown less favourab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, Lundh, Andreas, Page, Matthew J., Munkholm, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34843589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260544
_version_ 1784607166320082944
author Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand
Lundh, Andreas
Page, Matthew J.
Munkholm, Klaus
author_facet Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand
Lundh, Andreas
Page, Matthew J.
Munkholm, Klaus
author_sort Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective drug treatments for Covid-19 are needed to decrease morbidity and mortality for the individual and to alleviate pressure on health care systems. Remdesivir showed promising results in early randomised trials but subsequently a large publicly funded trial has shown less favourable results and the evidence is interpreted differently in clinical guidelines. Systematic reviews of remdesivir have been published, but none have systematically searched for unpublished data, including regulatory documents, and assessed the risk of bias due to missing evidence. METHODS: We will conduct a systematic review of randomised trials comparing remdesivir to placebo or standard of care in any setting. We will include trials regardless of the severity of disease and we will include trials examining remdesivir for indications other than Covid-19 for harms analyses. We will search websites of regulatory agencies, trial registries, bibliographic databases, preprint servers and contact trial sponsors to obtain all available data, including unpublished clinical data, for all eligible trials. Our primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes will be length of hospital stay, time to death, severe disease, and adverse events. We will assess the risk of bias using the Cochranes Risk of Bias 2 tool and the risk of bias due to missing evidence (e.g. publication bias, selective reporting bias) using the ROB-ME tool. Where appropriate we will synthesise study results by conducting random-effects meta-analysis. We will present our findings in a Summary of Findings table and rate the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. DISCUSSION: By conducting a comprehensive systematic review including unpublished data (where available), we expect to be able to provide valuable information for patients and clinicians about the benefits and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19. This will help to ensure optimal treatment for individual patients and optimal utilisation of health care resources. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42021255915.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8629254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86292542021-11-30 Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand Lundh, Andreas Page, Matthew J. Munkholm, Klaus PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Effective drug treatments for Covid-19 are needed to decrease morbidity and mortality for the individual and to alleviate pressure on health care systems. Remdesivir showed promising results in early randomised trials but subsequently a large publicly funded trial has shown less favourable results and the evidence is interpreted differently in clinical guidelines. Systematic reviews of remdesivir have been published, but none have systematically searched for unpublished data, including regulatory documents, and assessed the risk of bias due to missing evidence. METHODS: We will conduct a systematic review of randomised trials comparing remdesivir to placebo or standard of care in any setting. We will include trials regardless of the severity of disease and we will include trials examining remdesivir for indications other than Covid-19 for harms analyses. We will search websites of regulatory agencies, trial registries, bibliographic databases, preprint servers and contact trial sponsors to obtain all available data, including unpublished clinical data, for all eligible trials. Our primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes will be length of hospital stay, time to death, severe disease, and adverse events. We will assess the risk of bias using the Cochranes Risk of Bias 2 tool and the risk of bias due to missing evidence (e.g. publication bias, selective reporting bias) using the ROB-ME tool. Where appropriate we will synthesise study results by conducting random-effects meta-analysis. We will present our findings in a Summary of Findings table and rate the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. DISCUSSION: By conducting a comprehensive systematic review including unpublished data (where available), we expect to be able to provide valuable information for patients and clinicians about the benefits and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19. This will help to ensure optimal treatment for individual patients and optimal utilisation of health care resources. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42021255915. Public Library of Science 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8629254/ /pubmed/34843589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260544 Text en © 2021 Paludan-Müller et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand
Lundh, Andreas
Page, Matthew J.
Munkholm, Klaus
Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort protocol: benefits and harms of remdesivir for covid-19 in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34843589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260544
work_keys_str_mv AT paludanmullerasgersand protocolbenefitsandharmsofremdesivirforcovid19inadultsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT lundhandreas protocolbenefitsandharmsofremdesivirforcovid19inadultsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT pagematthewj protocolbenefitsandharmsofremdesivirforcovid19inadultsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT munkholmklaus protocolbenefitsandharmsofremdesivirforcovid19inadultsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis