Cargando…

A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals

Malalignment of the lower limbs is the main biomechanical factor for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The static hip-knee-ankle angle (S-HKAA) measured from radiograph is regarded as the “gold standard” of the malalignment. However, many evidences showed that the S-HKAA has no significant correlation with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Li, Liu, Geng, Han, Bing, Yan, Yuzhou, Fei, Junhua, Ma, Jianbing, Zhang, Yunfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6231406
_version_ 1784607247661268992
author Zhang, Li
Liu, Geng
Han, Bing
Yan, Yuzhou
Fei, Junhua
Ma, Jianbing
Zhang, Yunfei
author_facet Zhang, Li
Liu, Geng
Han, Bing
Yan, Yuzhou
Fei, Junhua
Ma, Jianbing
Zhang, Yunfei
author_sort Zhang, Li
collection PubMed
description Malalignment of the lower limbs is the main biomechanical factor for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The static hip-knee-ankle angle (S-HKAA) measured from radiograph is regarded as the “gold standard” of the malalignment. However, many evidences showed that the S-HKAA has no significant correlation with the knee dynamic-load distribution, unlike the dynamic HKAA (D-HKAA). The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the D-HKAA and investigate the relationship between D-HKAA and S-HKAA for both KOA and healthy participants. In this paper, twenty-five healthy subjects and twenty-five medial compartment KOA (M-KOA) patients were recruited. Three-dimensional motion analysis and standing lower-limbs-full-length radiograph were utilized to obtain the D-HKAA and S-HKAA, respectively. The results showed that the mean D-HKAA was more varus than the S-HKAA (p < 0.05). For the mean D-HKAA, larger varus angle was observed in swing phase than stance phase (p < 0.05). Compared with healthy subjects, the M-KOA patients had remarkably smaller S-HKAA and D-HKAA during gait cycle (p < 0.01). For the relationship between the S-HKAA and mean D-HKAA, no significant correlation was found for both healthy subjects and M-KOA patients (r < 0.357, n = 25, p > 0.05, Spearman correlation analysis). In conclusion, the S-HKAA was limited to predict the D-HKAA for both M-KOA patients and healthy subjects. The D-HKAA should be given more attention to the orthopedist and the designer of knee brace and orthotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8629624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86296242021-11-30 A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals Zhang, Li Liu, Geng Han, Bing Yan, Yuzhou Fei, Junhua Ma, Jianbing Zhang, Yunfei Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article Malalignment of the lower limbs is the main biomechanical factor for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The static hip-knee-ankle angle (S-HKAA) measured from radiograph is regarded as the “gold standard” of the malalignment. However, many evidences showed that the S-HKAA has no significant correlation with the knee dynamic-load distribution, unlike the dynamic HKAA (D-HKAA). The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the D-HKAA and investigate the relationship between D-HKAA and S-HKAA for both KOA and healthy participants. In this paper, twenty-five healthy subjects and twenty-five medial compartment KOA (M-KOA) patients were recruited. Three-dimensional motion analysis and standing lower-limbs-full-length radiograph were utilized to obtain the D-HKAA and S-HKAA, respectively. The results showed that the mean D-HKAA was more varus than the S-HKAA (p < 0.05). For the mean D-HKAA, larger varus angle was observed in swing phase than stance phase (p < 0.05). Compared with healthy subjects, the M-KOA patients had remarkably smaller S-HKAA and D-HKAA during gait cycle (p < 0.01). For the relationship between the S-HKAA and mean D-HKAA, no significant correlation was found for both healthy subjects and M-KOA patients (r < 0.357, n = 25, p > 0.05, Spearman correlation analysis). In conclusion, the S-HKAA was limited to predict the D-HKAA for both M-KOA patients and healthy subjects. The D-HKAA should be given more attention to the orthopedist and the designer of knee brace and orthotics. Hindawi 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8629624/ /pubmed/34853606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6231406 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Li
Liu, Geng
Han, Bing
Yan, Yuzhou
Fei, Junhua
Ma, Jianbing
Zhang, Yunfei
A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals
title A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals
title_full A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals
title_fullStr A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals
title_short A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals
title_sort comparison of dynamic and static hip-knee-ankle angle during gait in knee osteoarthritis patients and healthy individuals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6231406
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangli acomparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT liugeng acomparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT hanbing acomparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT yanyuzhou acomparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT feijunhua acomparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT majianbing acomparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT zhangyunfei acomparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT zhangli comparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT liugeng comparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT hanbing comparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT yanyuzhou comparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT feijunhua comparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT majianbing comparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals
AT zhangyunfei comparisonofdynamicandstatichipkneeankleangleduringgaitinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyindividuals