Cargando…

DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie

BACKGROUND: Robotic assistance has become established in surgery but is not yet a standard procedure. The current status of clinical dissemination in Germany remains unclear. Industry independent sources are scarce. AIM OF THE WORK: The aim of this survey was to investigate the current status of rob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krüger, C. M., Rückbeil, O., Sebestyen, U., Schlick, T., Kürbis, J., Riediger, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x
_version_ 1784607297416200192
author Krüger, C. M.
Rückbeil, O.
Sebestyen, U.
Schlick, T.
Kürbis, J.
Riediger, H.
author_facet Krüger, C. M.
Rückbeil, O.
Sebestyen, U.
Schlick, T.
Kürbis, J.
Riediger, H.
author_sort Krüger, C. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic assistance has become established in surgery but is not yet a standard procedure. The current status of clinical dissemination in Germany remains unclear. Industry independent sources are scarce. AIM OF THE WORK: The aim of this survey was to investigate the current status of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) across specialties in Germany from 2014 to 2018. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An internet search was used to identify hospitals and departments (DP) with access to RAS. The DPs were asked to share their data from 2014–2018. In addition to clinical data, data on utilization, implementation, training, and funding were requested. RESULTS: As of 31 December 2018 RAS was offered at 121 hospitals in Germany, 383 DPs with access to RAS were identified and 26% (n = 98) of DPs responded. On average each DP had two consultant surgeons, 10% of DPs had more than one RAS system and 100% of the RAS systems recorded were from Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA. RAS was implemented in 65% in urology and in 12% in visceral surgery (VS). 21% of programs were interdisciplinary and 4% multidisciplinary (> 3). 83% of systems were purchased and 17% otherwise funded. For additional operating room costs, 74% of hospitals reported paying for them themselves. 14% chose pay as you go. Since 2014, procedures increased by a factor of 4 to approximately 8000. The proportion of VS increased by a factor of 5 since 2016. CONCLUSION: RAS in Germany experienced strong growth through 2018. The range of procedures is similar to that of laparoscopy. With a current lack of reimbursement for the additional technical effort, RAS is predominantly used in the medium and high complexity range. The online survey is a good method to collect independent data without high administrative effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8629862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86298622021-12-15 DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie Krüger, C. M. Rückbeil, O. Sebestyen, U. Schlick, T. Kürbis, J. Riediger, H. Chirurg Originalien BACKGROUND: Robotic assistance has become established in surgery but is not yet a standard procedure. The current status of clinical dissemination in Germany remains unclear. Industry independent sources are scarce. AIM OF THE WORK: The aim of this survey was to investigate the current status of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) across specialties in Germany from 2014 to 2018. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An internet search was used to identify hospitals and departments (DP) with access to RAS. The DPs were asked to share their data from 2014–2018. In addition to clinical data, data on utilization, implementation, training, and funding were requested. RESULTS: As of 31 December 2018 RAS was offered at 121 hospitals in Germany, 383 DPs with access to RAS were identified and 26% (n = 98) of DPs responded. On average each DP had two consultant surgeons, 10% of DPs had more than one RAS system and 100% of the RAS systems recorded were from Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA. RAS was implemented in 65% in urology and in 12% in visceral surgery (VS). 21% of programs were interdisciplinary and 4% multidisciplinary (> 3). 83% of systems were purchased and 17% otherwise funded. For additional operating room costs, 74% of hospitals reported paying for them themselves. 14% chose pay as you go. Since 2014, procedures increased by a factor of 4 to approximately 8000. The proportion of VS increased by a factor of 5 since 2016. CONCLUSION: RAS in Germany experienced strong growth through 2018. The range of procedures is similar to that of laparoscopy. With a current lack of reimbursement for the additional technical effort, RAS is predominantly used in the medium and high complexity range. The online survey is a good method to collect independent data without high administrative effort. Springer Medizin 2021-06-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8629862/ /pubmed/34170354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Krüger, C. M.
Rückbeil, O.
Sebestyen, U.
Schlick, T.
Kürbis, J.
Riediger, H.
DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie
title DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie
title_full DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie
title_fullStr DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie
title_full_unstemmed DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie
title_short DeRAS I – deutsche Situation der robotisch assistierten Chirurgie – eine Online-Survey-Studie
title_sort deras i – deutsche situation der robotisch assistierten chirurgie – eine online-survey-studie
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x
work_keys_str_mv AT krugercm derasideutschesituationderrobotischassistiertenchirurgieeineonlinesurveystudie
AT ruckbeilo derasideutschesituationderrobotischassistiertenchirurgieeineonlinesurveystudie
AT sebestyenu derasideutschesituationderrobotischassistiertenchirurgieeineonlinesurveystudie
AT schlickt derasideutschesituationderrobotischassistiertenchirurgieeineonlinesurveystudie
AT kurbisj derasideutschesituationderrobotischassistiertenchirurgieeineonlinesurveystudie
AT riedigerh derasideutschesituationderrobotischassistiertenchirurgieeineonlinesurveystudie