Cargando…

Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block

INTRODUCTION: New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (LBBB(AVI)) implies a proximal pathogenesis of LBBB. This study compares electrocardiographic characteristics and concordance with LBBB definitions between LBBB(AVI) and non-procedure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calle, S., Coeman, M., Demolder, A., Philipsen, T., Kayaert, P., De Buyzere, M., Timmermans, F., De Pooter, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33929708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01565-8
_version_ 1784607343346974720
author Calle, S.
Coeman, M.
Demolder, A.
Philipsen, T.
Kayaert, P.
De Buyzere, M.
Timmermans, F.
De Pooter, J.
author_facet Calle, S.
Coeman, M.
Demolder, A.
Philipsen, T.
Kayaert, P.
De Buyzere, M.
Timmermans, F.
De Pooter, J.
author_sort Calle, S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (LBBB(AVI)) implies a proximal pathogenesis of LBBB. This study compares electrocardiographic characteristics and concordance with LBBB definitions between LBBB(AVI) and non-procedure-induced LBBB controls (LBBB(control)). METHODS: All LBBB(AVI) patients at Ghent University Hospital between 2013 and 2019 were enrolled in the study. LBBB(AVI) patients were matched for age, sex, ischaemic heart disease and ejection fraction to LBBB(control) patients in a 1:2 ratio. For inclusion, a non-strict LBBB definition was used (QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, QS or rS in V1, absence of Q waves in V5-6). Electrocardiograms were digitally analysed and classified according to three LBBB definitions: European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Strauss and American Heart Association (AHA). RESULTS: A total of 177 patients (59 LBBB(AVI) and 118 LBBB(control)) were enrolled in the study. LBBB(AVI) patients had more lateral QRS notching/slurring (100% vs 85%, p = 0.001), included a higher percentage with a QRS duration ≥ 130 ms (98% vs 86%, p = 0.007) and had a less leftward oriented QRS axis (−15° vs −30°, p = 0.013) compared to the LBBB(control) group. ESC and Strauss criteria were fulfilled in 100% and 95% of LBBB(AVI) patients, respectively, but only 18% met the AHA criteria. In LBBB(control) patients, concordance with LBBB definitions was lower than in the LBBB(AVI) group: ESC 85% (p = 0.001), Strauss 68% (p < 0.001) and AHA 7% (p = 0.035). No differences in electrocardiographic characterisation or concordance with LBBB definitions were observed between LBBB(AVI) and LBBB(control) patients with lateral QRS notching/slurring. CONCLUSION: Non-uniformity exists among current LBBB definitions concerning the detection of proximal LBBB. LBBB(AVI) may provide a framework for more consensus on defining proximal LBBB. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-021-01565-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86301732021-12-10 Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block Calle, S. Coeman, M. Demolder, A. Philipsen, T. Kayaert, P. De Buyzere, M. Timmermans, F. De Pooter, J. Neth Heart J Original Article INTRODUCTION: New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (LBBB(AVI)) implies a proximal pathogenesis of LBBB. This study compares electrocardiographic characteristics and concordance with LBBB definitions between LBBB(AVI) and non-procedure-induced LBBB controls (LBBB(control)). METHODS: All LBBB(AVI) patients at Ghent University Hospital between 2013 and 2019 were enrolled in the study. LBBB(AVI) patients were matched for age, sex, ischaemic heart disease and ejection fraction to LBBB(control) patients in a 1:2 ratio. For inclusion, a non-strict LBBB definition was used (QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, QS or rS in V1, absence of Q waves in V5-6). Electrocardiograms were digitally analysed and classified according to three LBBB definitions: European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Strauss and American Heart Association (AHA). RESULTS: A total of 177 patients (59 LBBB(AVI) and 118 LBBB(control)) were enrolled in the study. LBBB(AVI) patients had more lateral QRS notching/slurring (100% vs 85%, p = 0.001), included a higher percentage with a QRS duration ≥ 130 ms (98% vs 86%, p = 0.007) and had a less leftward oriented QRS axis (−15° vs −30°, p = 0.013) compared to the LBBB(control) group. ESC and Strauss criteria were fulfilled in 100% and 95% of LBBB(AVI) patients, respectively, but only 18% met the AHA criteria. In LBBB(control) patients, concordance with LBBB definitions was lower than in the LBBB(AVI) group: ESC 85% (p = 0.001), Strauss 68% (p < 0.001) and AHA 7% (p = 0.035). No differences in electrocardiographic characterisation or concordance with LBBB definitions were observed between LBBB(AVI) and LBBB(control) patients with lateral QRS notching/slurring. CONCLUSION: Non-uniformity exists among current LBBB definitions concerning the detection of proximal LBBB. LBBB(AVI) may provide a framework for more consensus on defining proximal LBBB. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-021-01565-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-04-30 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8630173/ /pubmed/33929708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01565-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Calle, S.
Coeman, M.
Demolder, A.
Philipsen, T.
Kayaert, P.
De Buyzere, M.
Timmermans, F.
De Pooter, J.
Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block
title Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block
title_full Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block
title_fullStr Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block
title_full_unstemmed Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block
title_short Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block
title_sort aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33929708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01565-8
work_keys_str_mv AT calles aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock
AT coemanm aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock
AT demoldera aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock
AT philipsent aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock
AT kayaertp aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock
AT debuyzerem aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock
AT timmermansf aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock
AT depooterj aorticvalveimplantationinducedconductionblockasaframeworktowardsauniformelectrocardiographicdefinitionofleftbundlebranchblock