Cargando…

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate device size selection in patients within the borderline annulus size range undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to assess if pre-procedural patient-specific computer simulation will lead to the selection of a different device s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halim, J., Brouwer, J., Lycke, M., Swaans, M. J., Van der Heyden, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01620-4
_version_ 1784607353575833600
author Halim, J.
Brouwer, J.
Lycke, M.
Swaans, M. J.
Van der Heyden, J.
author_facet Halim, J.
Brouwer, J.
Lycke, M.
Swaans, M. J.
Van der Heyden, J.
author_sort Halim, J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate device size selection in patients within the borderline annulus size range undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to assess if pre-procedural patient-specific computer simulation will lead to the selection of a different device size than standard of care. BACKGROUND: In TAVR, appropriate device sizing is imperative. In borderline annulus size cases no standardised technique for tailored device size selection is currently available. Pre-procedural patient-specific computer simulation can be used, predicting the risk for paravalvular leakage (PVL) and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, 140 patients in the borderline annulus size range were included. Hereafter, device size selection was left to the discretion of the operator. After TAVR, in 24 of the 140 patients, patient-specific computer simulation calculated the most appropriate device size expected to give the lowest risk for PVL and need for PPI. In these 24 patients, device size selection based on patient-specific computer simulation was compared with standard-of-care device size selection relying on a standardised matrix (Medtronic). RESULTS: In a significant proportion of the 140 patients (26.4%) a different device size than recommended by the matrix was implanted. In 10 of the 24 patients (41.7%) in whom a computer simulation was performed, a different device size was recommended than by means of the matrix. CONCLUSIONS: Device size selection in patients within the borderline annulus size range is still ambiguous. In these patients, patient-specific computer simulation is feasible and can contribute to a more tailored device size selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86302712021-12-10 Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases Halim, J. Brouwer, J. Lycke, M. Swaans, M. J. Van der Heyden, J. Neth Heart J Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate device size selection in patients within the borderline annulus size range undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to assess if pre-procedural patient-specific computer simulation will lead to the selection of a different device size than standard of care. BACKGROUND: In TAVR, appropriate device sizing is imperative. In borderline annulus size cases no standardised technique for tailored device size selection is currently available. Pre-procedural patient-specific computer simulation can be used, predicting the risk for paravalvular leakage (PVL) and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, 140 patients in the borderline annulus size range were included. Hereafter, device size selection was left to the discretion of the operator. After TAVR, in 24 of the 140 patients, patient-specific computer simulation calculated the most appropriate device size expected to give the lowest risk for PVL and need for PPI. In these 24 patients, device size selection based on patient-specific computer simulation was compared with standard-of-care device size selection relying on a standardised matrix (Medtronic). RESULTS: In a significant proportion of the 140 patients (26.4%) a different device size than recommended by the matrix was implanted. In 10 of the 24 patients (41.7%) in whom a computer simulation was performed, a different device size was recommended than by means of the matrix. CONCLUSIONS: Device size selection in patients within the borderline annulus size range is still ambiguous. In these patients, patient-specific computer simulation is feasible and can contribute to a more tailored device size selection. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-09-08 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8630271/ /pubmed/34495448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01620-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Halim, J.
Brouwer, J.
Lycke, M.
Swaans, M. J.
Van der Heyden, J.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases
title Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases
title_full Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases
title_fullStr Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases
title_full_unstemmed Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases
title_short Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases
title_sort transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural feops heartguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01620-4
work_keys_str_mv AT halimj transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementimpactofpreproceduralfeopsheartguideassessmentondevicesizeselectioninborderlineannulussizecases
AT brouwerj transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementimpactofpreproceduralfeopsheartguideassessmentondevicesizeselectioninborderlineannulussizecases
AT lyckem transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementimpactofpreproceduralfeopsheartguideassessmentondevicesizeselectioninborderlineannulussizecases
AT swaansmj transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementimpactofpreproceduralfeopsheartguideassessmentondevicesizeselectioninborderlineannulussizecases
AT vanderheydenj transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementimpactofpreproceduralfeopsheartguideassessmentondevicesizeselectioninborderlineannulussizecases