Cargando…

Generic Logic Model for Coronavirus Disease-2019 Responses Based on the South Korean Experience

BACKGROUND: As the global coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, many countries have implemented public health policies, such as lockdowns and physical distancing measures, to prevent its spread. South Korea’s response to COVID-19, which prevented an increase in confirmed cases and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chun, Hae-ryoung, Yoon, Kyuhyun, Kim, Hana, Cheon, Eunsil, Ha, Jaeyoung, Tak, Sangwoo, Cho, Sung-il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858073
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S336425
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: As the global coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, many countries have implemented public health policies, such as lockdowns and physical distancing measures, to prevent its spread. South Korea’s response to COVID-19, which prevented an increase in confirmed cases and increased resilience, has been considered very effective. PURPOSE: To analyze Korea’s response to COVID-19 in 2020 and develop a logic model to evaluate performance effectiveness in follow-up studies. METHODS: By content analysis of Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) press releases, we defined the problems and identified the causes of the health and social effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. Next, we created a problem tree and developed a logic model that comprised inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts. Finally, we held expert consultations to obtain expert opinions regarding the logic model and to ensure the model’s validity. RESULTS: South Korea’s COVID-19 response policy mitigated the social and health impacts. The 2020 COVID-19 responses had four outcomes (identifying cases on time, preventing transmission of coronavirus infection, effective treatment of COVID-19 cases, protecting public resilience and well-being) and 12 outputs; South Korea conducted 32 activities. CONCLUSION: The results can be a practical reference for managing problems faced in other countries. Korean policy may be of interest in the future for international decision-makers in charge of policy enforcement and those who may be called on to respond to new infectious diseases.