Cargando…

Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics

AIMS: To determine the preferred method of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: 1804 women from a prospective study (NCT02036619) received a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks. Tolerance of screening tests and preference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raets, Lore, Vandewinkel, Marie, Van Crombrugge, Paul, Moyson, Carolien, Verhaeghe, Johan, Vandeginste, Sofie, Verlaenen, Hilde, Vercammen, Chris, Maes, Toon, Dufraimont, Els, Roggen, Nele, De Block, Christophe, Jacquemyn, Yves, Mekahli, Farah, De Clippel, Katrien, Van Den Bruel, Annick, Loccufier, Anne, Laenen, Annouschka, Devlieger, Roland, Mathieu, Chantal, Benhalima, Katrien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.781384
_version_ 1784607383564058624
author Raets, Lore
Vandewinkel, Marie
Van Crombrugge, Paul
Moyson, Carolien
Verhaeghe, Johan
Vandeginste, Sofie
Verlaenen, Hilde
Vercammen, Chris
Maes, Toon
Dufraimont, Els
Roggen, Nele
De Block, Christophe
Jacquemyn, Yves
Mekahli, Farah
De Clippel, Katrien
Van Den Bruel, Annick
Loccufier, Anne
Laenen, Annouschka
Devlieger, Roland
Mathieu, Chantal
Benhalima, Katrien
author_facet Raets, Lore
Vandewinkel, Marie
Van Crombrugge, Paul
Moyson, Carolien
Verhaeghe, Johan
Vandeginste, Sofie
Verlaenen, Hilde
Vercammen, Chris
Maes, Toon
Dufraimont, Els
Roggen, Nele
De Block, Christophe
Jacquemyn, Yves
Mekahli, Farah
De Clippel, Katrien
Van Den Bruel, Annick
Loccufier, Anne
Laenen, Annouschka
Devlieger, Roland
Mathieu, Chantal
Benhalima, Katrien
author_sort Raets, Lore
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine the preferred method of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: 1804 women from a prospective study (NCT02036619) received a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks. Tolerance of screening tests and preference for screening strategy (two-step screening strategy with GCT compared to one-step screening strategy with OGTT) were evaluated by a self-designed questionnaire at the time of the GCT and OGTT. RESULTS: Compared to women who preferred one-step screening [26.2% (472)], women who preferred two-step screening [46.3% (834)] were less often from a minor ethnic background [6.0% (50) vs. 10.7% (50), p=0.003], had less often a previous history of GDM [7.3% (29) vs. 13.8% (32), p=0.008], were less often overweight or obese [respectively 23.1% (50) vs. 24.8% (116), p<0.001 and 7.9% (66) vs. 18.2% (85), p<0.001], were less insulin resistant in early pregnancy (HOMA-IR 8.9 (6.4-12.3) vs. 9.9 (7.2-14.2), p<0.001], and pregnancy outcomes were similar except for fewer labor inductions and emergency cesarean sections [respectively 26.6% (198) vs. 32.5% (137), p=0.031 and 8.2% (68) vs. 13.0% (61), p=0.005]. Women who preferred two-step screening had more often complaints of the OGTT compared to women who preferred one-step screening [50.4% (420) vs. 40.3% (190), p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step GDM screening involving a GCT and subsequent OGTT is the preferred GDM screening strategy. Women with a more adverse metabolic profile preferred one-step screening with OGTT while women preferring two-step screening had a better metabolic profile and more discomfort of the OGTT. The preference for the GDM screening method is in line with the recommended Flemish modified two-step screening method, in which women at higher risk for GDM are recommended a one-step screening strategy with an OGTT, while women without these risk factors, are offered a two-step screening strategy with GCT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02036619 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02036619
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86305442021-12-01 Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics Raets, Lore Vandewinkel, Marie Van Crombrugge, Paul Moyson, Carolien Verhaeghe, Johan Vandeginste, Sofie Verlaenen, Hilde Vercammen, Chris Maes, Toon Dufraimont, Els Roggen, Nele De Block, Christophe Jacquemyn, Yves Mekahli, Farah De Clippel, Katrien Van Den Bruel, Annick Loccufier, Anne Laenen, Annouschka Devlieger, Roland Mathieu, Chantal Benhalima, Katrien Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology AIMS: To determine the preferred method of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: 1804 women from a prospective study (NCT02036619) received a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks. Tolerance of screening tests and preference for screening strategy (two-step screening strategy with GCT compared to one-step screening strategy with OGTT) were evaluated by a self-designed questionnaire at the time of the GCT and OGTT. RESULTS: Compared to women who preferred one-step screening [26.2% (472)], women who preferred two-step screening [46.3% (834)] were less often from a minor ethnic background [6.0% (50) vs. 10.7% (50), p=0.003], had less often a previous history of GDM [7.3% (29) vs. 13.8% (32), p=0.008], were less often overweight or obese [respectively 23.1% (50) vs. 24.8% (116), p<0.001 and 7.9% (66) vs. 18.2% (85), p<0.001], were less insulin resistant in early pregnancy (HOMA-IR 8.9 (6.4-12.3) vs. 9.9 (7.2-14.2), p<0.001], and pregnancy outcomes were similar except for fewer labor inductions and emergency cesarean sections [respectively 26.6% (198) vs. 32.5% (137), p=0.031 and 8.2% (68) vs. 13.0% (61), p=0.005]. Women who preferred two-step screening had more often complaints of the OGTT compared to women who preferred one-step screening [50.4% (420) vs. 40.3% (190), p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step GDM screening involving a GCT and subsequent OGTT is the preferred GDM screening strategy. Women with a more adverse metabolic profile preferred one-step screening with OGTT while women preferring two-step screening had a better metabolic profile and more discomfort of the OGTT. The preference for the GDM screening method is in line with the recommended Flemish modified two-step screening method, in which women at higher risk for GDM are recommended a one-step screening strategy with an OGTT, while women without these risk factors, are offered a two-step screening strategy with GCT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02036619 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02036619 Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8630544/ /pubmed/34858350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.781384 Text en Copyright © 2021 Raets, Vandewinkel, Van Crombrugge, Moyson, Verhaeghe, Vandeginste, Verlaenen, Vercammen, Maes, Dufraimont, Roggen, De Block, Jacquemyn, Mekahli, De Clippel, Van Den Bruel, Loccufier, Laenen, Devlieger, Mathieu and Benhalima https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Raets, Lore
Vandewinkel, Marie
Van Crombrugge, Paul
Moyson, Carolien
Verhaeghe, Johan
Vandeginste, Sofie
Verlaenen, Hilde
Vercammen, Chris
Maes, Toon
Dufraimont, Els
Roggen, Nele
De Block, Christophe
Jacquemyn, Yves
Mekahli, Farah
De Clippel, Katrien
Van Den Bruel, Annick
Loccufier, Anne
Laenen, Annouschka
Devlieger, Roland
Mathieu, Chantal
Benhalima, Katrien
Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics
title Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics
title_full Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics
title_fullStr Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics
title_short Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics
title_sort preference of women for gestational diabetes screening method according to tolerance of tests and population characteristics
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.781384
work_keys_str_mv AT raetslore preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT vandewinkelmarie preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT vancrombruggepaul preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT moysoncarolien preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT verhaeghejohan preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT vandeginstesofie preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT verlaenenhilde preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT vercammenchris preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT maestoon preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT dufraimontels preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT roggennele preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT deblockchristophe preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT jacquemynyves preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT mekahlifarah preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT declippelkatrien preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT vandenbruelannick preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT loccufieranne preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT laenenannouschka preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT devliegerroland preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT mathieuchantal preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics
AT benhalimakatrien preferenceofwomenforgestationaldiabetesscreeningmethodaccordingtotoleranceoftestsandpopulationcharacteristics