Cargando…

Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of advanced- (a-HCL) vs. standard-hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems use up to 6 months of treatment in a real-world setting of children and adolescents with T1DM. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all T1DM pediatric users o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tornese, Gianluca, Buzzurro, Francesca, Carletti, Claudia, Faleschini, Elena, Barbi, Egidio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.766314
_version_ 1784607422892998656
author Tornese, Gianluca
Buzzurro, Francesca
Carletti, Claudia
Faleschini, Elena
Barbi, Egidio
author_facet Tornese, Gianluca
Buzzurro, Francesca
Carletti, Claudia
Faleschini, Elena
Barbi, Egidio
author_sort Tornese, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of advanced- (a-HCL) vs. standard-hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems use up to 6 months of treatment in a real-world setting of children and adolescents with T1DM. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all T1DM pediatric users of MiniMed™ 670G system (s-HCL) and 780G system (a-HCL). HbA1c and BMI were collected at baseline and three and six months after HCL start. Data on glycemic control were extracted from reports generated with CareLink™ Personal Software in Manual Mode, at HCL start, after one, three, and six months after HCL beginning. RESULTS: The study included 44 individuals with a median age of 13.3 years (range 2- 21 years), 20 on s-HCL, and 24 on a-HCL. a-HCL users had a significantly lower HbA1c compared to s-HCL after six months of HCL use (7.1 vs. 7.7%). Significant differences in HbA1c between a-HCL and s-HCL users were found in children aged 7-14 years (7.1 vs. 7.7% after six months) and in those with a worse (HbA1c >8%) glycemic control at the beginning (7.1 vs. 8.1% after six months). No significant changes in HbA1c were found in a-HCL users that previously used a s-HCL system. Nevertheless, only the use of a-HCL significantly predicted a lower HbA1c after six months. All sensor-specific measures of glycemic control improved from Manual to Auto mode, in both s-HCL and a-HCL, without increasing time spent in hypoglycemia. However, the percentage of individuals with TIR>70% increased significantly in a-HCL users, who attained this target earlier and more stably: younger age, a higher rate of auto-correction, and a lower amount of CHO inserted predicted a TIR>70%. BMI SDS did not significantly change throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: This real-world study suggests that effectiveness might be greater in a-HCL than in s-HCL, with significant changes in HbA1c, and reaching earlier and more stably the target of TIR >70%, without increasing hypoglycemia or BMI. At the same time, previous users of s-HCL systems did not show any further improvement with a-HCL. Children under the age of 14 years of age, not represented in previous studies, seem to benefit the most from a-HCL pumps as well as individuals with the worst glycemic control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86307402021-12-01 Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Tornese, Gianluca Buzzurro, Francesca Carletti, Claudia Faleschini, Elena Barbi, Egidio Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of advanced- (a-HCL) vs. standard-hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems use up to 6 months of treatment in a real-world setting of children and adolescents with T1DM. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all T1DM pediatric users of MiniMed™ 670G system (s-HCL) and 780G system (a-HCL). HbA1c and BMI were collected at baseline and three and six months after HCL start. Data on glycemic control were extracted from reports generated with CareLink™ Personal Software in Manual Mode, at HCL start, after one, three, and six months after HCL beginning. RESULTS: The study included 44 individuals with a median age of 13.3 years (range 2- 21 years), 20 on s-HCL, and 24 on a-HCL. a-HCL users had a significantly lower HbA1c compared to s-HCL after six months of HCL use (7.1 vs. 7.7%). Significant differences in HbA1c between a-HCL and s-HCL users were found in children aged 7-14 years (7.1 vs. 7.7% after six months) and in those with a worse (HbA1c >8%) glycemic control at the beginning (7.1 vs. 8.1% after six months). No significant changes in HbA1c were found in a-HCL users that previously used a s-HCL system. Nevertheless, only the use of a-HCL significantly predicted a lower HbA1c after six months. All sensor-specific measures of glycemic control improved from Manual to Auto mode, in both s-HCL and a-HCL, without increasing time spent in hypoglycemia. However, the percentage of individuals with TIR>70% increased significantly in a-HCL users, who attained this target earlier and more stably: younger age, a higher rate of auto-correction, and a lower amount of CHO inserted predicted a TIR>70%. BMI SDS did not significantly change throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: This real-world study suggests that effectiveness might be greater in a-HCL than in s-HCL, with significant changes in HbA1c, and reaching earlier and more stably the target of TIR >70%, without increasing hypoglycemia or BMI. At the same time, previous users of s-HCL systems did not show any further improvement with a-HCL. Children under the age of 14 years of age, not represented in previous studies, seem to benefit the most from a-HCL pumps as well as individuals with the worst glycemic control. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8630740/ /pubmed/34858339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.766314 Text en Copyright © 2021 Tornese, Buzzurro, Carletti, Faleschini and Barbi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Tornese, Gianluca
Buzzurro, Francesca
Carletti, Claudia
Faleschini, Elena
Barbi, Egidio
Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
title Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
title_fullStr Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
title_short Six-Month Effectiveness of Advanced vs. Standard Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
title_sort six-month effectiveness of advanced vs. standard hybrid closed-loop system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.766314
work_keys_str_mv AT tornesegianluca sixmontheffectivenessofadvancedvsstandardhybridclosedloopsysteminchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT buzzurrofrancesca sixmontheffectivenessofadvancedvsstandardhybridclosedloopsysteminchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT carletticlaudia sixmontheffectivenessofadvancedvsstandardhybridclosedloopsysteminchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT faleschinielena sixmontheffectivenessofadvancedvsstandardhybridclosedloopsysteminchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT barbiegidio sixmontheffectivenessofadvancedvsstandardhybridclosedloopsysteminchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesmellitus