Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screws (CS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. METHODS: Data from 69 young adults, who were admitted for femoral neck fracture between March 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Changjun, Lu, Yao, Wang, Qian, Ren, Cheng, Li, Ming, Yang, Mingyi, Xu, Yibo, Li, Zhong, Zhang, Kun, Ma, Teng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0
_version_ 1784607439593668608
author He, Changjun
Lu, Yao
Wang, Qian
Ren, Cheng
Li, Ming
Yang, Mingyi
Xu, Yibo
Li, Zhong
Zhang, Kun
Ma, Teng
author_facet He, Changjun
Lu, Yao
Wang, Qian
Ren, Cheng
Li, Ming
Yang, Mingyi
Xu, Yibo
Li, Zhong
Zhang, Kun
Ma, Teng
author_sort He, Changjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screws (CS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. METHODS: Data from 69 young adults, who were admitted for femoral neck fracture between March 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical method: FNS and CS. The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, operative duration, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris score of hip function, excellent and good rate of hip function, and postoperative complications (infection, cut out the internal fixation, nail withdrawal, and femoral neck shortening) were compared between the two groups. Hip joint function was evaluated using the Harris Hip Scoring system. RESULTS: All 69 patients had satisfactory reduction and were followed up for 12–24 months, with a mean follow-up of 16.91 ± 3.01 months. Mean time to fracture healing was13.82 ± 1.59 and 14.03 ± 1.78 weeks in the FNS and CS groups, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies between the 2 groups (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences, in operation duration, hospital length of stay, fracture healing time, complications, Harris Hip Score for hip function and excellent and good rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of complications was 6.1%(2/33) in the FNS group lower than 25%(9/36) in the CS group, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.032). At the last follow-up, the Harris Hip Score of the hip joint in the FNS group was 90.42 ± 4.82and 88.44 ± 5.91 in the CS group. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment methods resulted in higher rates of fracture healing and excellent hip function. Compared with CS, the FNS reduced the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, radiation exposure to medical staff and patients, and short-term complications including femoral neck shortening and bone nonunion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86308352021-12-01 Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults He, Changjun Lu, Yao Wang, Qian Ren, Cheng Li, Ming Yang, Mingyi Xu, Yibo Li, Zhong Zhang, Kun Ma, Teng BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screws (CS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. METHODS: Data from 69 young adults, who were admitted for femoral neck fracture between March 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical method: FNS and CS. The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, operative duration, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris score of hip function, excellent and good rate of hip function, and postoperative complications (infection, cut out the internal fixation, nail withdrawal, and femoral neck shortening) were compared between the two groups. Hip joint function was evaluated using the Harris Hip Scoring system. RESULTS: All 69 patients had satisfactory reduction and were followed up for 12–24 months, with a mean follow-up of 16.91 ± 3.01 months. Mean time to fracture healing was13.82 ± 1.59 and 14.03 ± 1.78 weeks in the FNS and CS groups, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies between the 2 groups (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences, in operation duration, hospital length of stay, fracture healing time, complications, Harris Hip Score for hip function and excellent and good rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of complications was 6.1%(2/33) in the FNS group lower than 25%(9/36) in the CS group, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.032). At the last follow-up, the Harris Hip Score of the hip joint in the FNS group was 90.42 ± 4.82and 88.44 ± 5.91 in the CS group. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment methods resulted in higher rates of fracture healing and excellent hip function. Compared with CS, the FNS reduced the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, radiation exposure to medical staff and patients, and short-term complications including femoral neck shortening and bone nonunion. BioMed Central 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8630835/ /pubmed/34844578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
He, Changjun
Lu, Yao
Wang, Qian
Ren, Cheng
Li, Ming
Yang, Mingyi
Xu, Yibo
Li, Zhong
Zhang, Kun
Ma, Teng
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
title Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
title_full Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
title_short Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
title_sort comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hechangjun comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT luyao comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT wangqian comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT rencheng comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT liming comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT yangmingyi comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT xuyibo comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT lizhong comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT zhangkun comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults
AT mateng comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults