Cargando…
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults
BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screws (CS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. METHODS: Data from 69 young adults, who were admitted for femoral neck fracture between March 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0 |
_version_ | 1784607439593668608 |
---|---|
author | He, Changjun Lu, Yao Wang, Qian Ren, Cheng Li, Ming Yang, Mingyi Xu, Yibo Li, Zhong Zhang, Kun Ma, Teng |
author_facet | He, Changjun Lu, Yao Wang, Qian Ren, Cheng Li, Ming Yang, Mingyi Xu, Yibo Li, Zhong Zhang, Kun Ma, Teng |
author_sort | He, Changjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screws (CS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. METHODS: Data from 69 young adults, who were admitted for femoral neck fracture between March 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical method: FNS and CS. The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, operative duration, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris score of hip function, excellent and good rate of hip function, and postoperative complications (infection, cut out the internal fixation, nail withdrawal, and femoral neck shortening) were compared between the two groups. Hip joint function was evaluated using the Harris Hip Scoring system. RESULTS: All 69 patients had satisfactory reduction and were followed up for 12–24 months, with a mean follow-up of 16.91 ± 3.01 months. Mean time to fracture healing was13.82 ± 1.59 and 14.03 ± 1.78 weeks in the FNS and CS groups, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies between the 2 groups (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences, in operation duration, hospital length of stay, fracture healing time, complications, Harris Hip Score for hip function and excellent and good rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of complications was 6.1%(2/33) in the FNS group lower than 25%(9/36) in the CS group, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.032). At the last follow-up, the Harris Hip Score of the hip joint in the FNS group was 90.42 ± 4.82and 88.44 ± 5.91 in the CS group. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment methods resulted in higher rates of fracture healing and excellent hip function. Compared with CS, the FNS reduced the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, radiation exposure to medical staff and patients, and short-term complications including femoral neck shortening and bone nonunion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8630835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86308352021-12-01 Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults He, Changjun Lu, Yao Wang, Qian Ren, Cheng Li, Ming Yang, Mingyi Xu, Yibo Li, Zhong Zhang, Kun Ma, Teng BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screws (CS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. METHODS: Data from 69 young adults, who were admitted for femoral neck fracture between March 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical method: FNS and CS. The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, operative duration, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris score of hip function, excellent and good rate of hip function, and postoperative complications (infection, cut out the internal fixation, nail withdrawal, and femoral neck shortening) were compared between the two groups. Hip joint function was evaluated using the Harris Hip Scoring system. RESULTS: All 69 patients had satisfactory reduction and were followed up for 12–24 months, with a mean follow-up of 16.91 ± 3.01 months. Mean time to fracture healing was13.82 ± 1.59 and 14.03 ± 1.78 weeks in the FNS and CS groups, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies between the 2 groups (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences, in operation duration, hospital length of stay, fracture healing time, complications, Harris Hip Score for hip function and excellent and good rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of complications was 6.1%(2/33) in the FNS group lower than 25%(9/36) in the CS group, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.032). At the last follow-up, the Harris Hip Score of the hip joint in the FNS group was 90.42 ± 4.82and 88.44 ± 5.91 in the CS group. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment methods resulted in higher rates of fracture healing and excellent hip function. Compared with CS, the FNS reduced the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, radiation exposure to medical staff and patients, and short-term complications including femoral neck shortening and bone nonunion. BioMed Central 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8630835/ /pubmed/34844578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research He, Changjun Lu, Yao Wang, Qian Ren, Cheng Li, Ming Yang, Mingyi Xu, Yibo Li, Zhong Zhang, Kun Ma, Teng Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults |
title | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults |
title_full | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults |
title_short | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults |
title_sort | comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hechangjun comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT luyao comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT wangqian comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT rencheng comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT liming comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT yangmingyi comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT xuyibo comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT lizhong comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT zhangkun comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults AT mateng comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofafemoralnecksystemversuscannulatedscrewsinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfractureinyoungadults |