Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure

BACKGROUND: The Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) is a measure that assesses the quality and safety of care during the transition from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PACT-M in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, La-mei, Liu, Ment-ting, Sun, Meng-jie, Wang, Jia-nan, Lin, Bei-lei, Wang, Peng, Li, Qiu-fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07298-z
_version_ 1784607446725033984
author Liu, La-mei
Liu, Ment-ting
Sun, Meng-jie
Wang, Jia-nan
Lin, Bei-lei
Wang, Peng
Li, Qiu-fang
author_facet Liu, La-mei
Liu, Ment-ting
Sun, Meng-jie
Wang, Jia-nan
Lin, Bei-lei
Wang, Peng
Li, Qiu-fang
author_sort Liu, La-mei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) is a measure that assesses the quality and safety of care during the transition from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PACT-M in Mainland China. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of patients was recruited from three tertiary hospitals affiliated with Zhengzhou University, China. A total of 402 participants were interviewed before discharge, and 306 participants were interviewed one month after discharge from hospital to home using the Chinese version of the PACT-M. The statistical methods used in this study include the critical ratio value, item total correlation, test-retest, Cronbach’s alpha, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the PACT-M consists of PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2), both of which have two dimensions, the number of items in both parts are consistent with the original English language version. The Cronbach’s alpha values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were 0.802 and 0.741, and the test-retest reliability values were 0.885 and 0.837. The item content validity index and scale content validity index values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were all 1.0. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the PACT-M shows acceptable validity and reliability and can be used to assess the quality and safety of transitional care from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective in mainland China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86308702021-12-01 Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure Liu, La-mei Liu, Ment-ting Sun, Meng-jie Wang, Jia-nan Lin, Bei-lei Wang, Peng Li, Qiu-fang BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) is a measure that assesses the quality and safety of care during the transition from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PACT-M in Mainland China. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of patients was recruited from three tertiary hospitals affiliated with Zhengzhou University, China. A total of 402 participants were interviewed before discharge, and 306 participants were interviewed one month after discharge from hospital to home using the Chinese version of the PACT-M. The statistical methods used in this study include the critical ratio value, item total correlation, test-retest, Cronbach’s alpha, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the PACT-M consists of PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2), both of which have two dimensions, the number of items in both parts are consistent with the original English language version. The Cronbach’s alpha values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were 0.802 and 0.741, and the test-retest reliability values were 0.885 and 0.837. The item content validity index and scale content validity index values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were all 1.0. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the PACT-M shows acceptable validity and reliability and can be used to assess the quality and safety of transitional care from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective in mainland China. BioMed Central 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8630870/ /pubmed/34844597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07298-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, La-mei
Liu, Ment-ting
Sun, Meng-jie
Wang, Jia-nan
Lin, Bei-lei
Wang, Peng
Li, Qiu-fang
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
title Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
title_full Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
title_short Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
title_sort validity and reliability of the chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07298-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liulamei validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure
AT liumentting validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure
AT sunmengjie validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure
AT wangjianan validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure
AT linbeilei validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure
AT wangpeng validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure
AT liqiufang validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure