Cargando…
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
BACKGROUND: The Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) is a measure that assesses the quality and safety of care during the transition from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PACT-M in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07298-z |
_version_ | 1784607446725033984 |
---|---|
author | Liu, La-mei Liu, Ment-ting Sun, Meng-jie Wang, Jia-nan Lin, Bei-lei Wang, Peng Li, Qiu-fang |
author_facet | Liu, La-mei Liu, Ment-ting Sun, Meng-jie Wang, Jia-nan Lin, Bei-lei Wang, Peng Li, Qiu-fang |
author_sort | Liu, La-mei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) is a measure that assesses the quality and safety of care during the transition from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PACT-M in Mainland China. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of patients was recruited from three tertiary hospitals affiliated with Zhengzhou University, China. A total of 402 participants were interviewed before discharge, and 306 participants were interviewed one month after discharge from hospital to home using the Chinese version of the PACT-M. The statistical methods used in this study include the critical ratio value, item total correlation, test-retest, Cronbach’s alpha, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the PACT-M consists of PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2), both of which have two dimensions, the number of items in both parts are consistent with the original English language version. The Cronbach’s alpha values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were 0.802 and 0.741, and the test-retest reliability values were 0.885 and 0.837. The item content validity index and scale content validity index values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were all 1.0. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the PACT-M shows acceptable validity and reliability and can be used to assess the quality and safety of transitional care from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective in mainland China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8630870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86308702021-12-01 Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure Liu, La-mei Liu, Ment-ting Sun, Meng-jie Wang, Jia-nan Lin, Bei-lei Wang, Peng Li, Qiu-fang BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) is a measure that assesses the quality and safety of care during the transition from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PACT-M in Mainland China. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of patients was recruited from three tertiary hospitals affiliated with Zhengzhou University, China. A total of 402 participants were interviewed before discharge, and 306 participants were interviewed one month after discharge from hospital to home using the Chinese version of the PACT-M. The statistical methods used in this study include the critical ratio value, item total correlation, test-retest, Cronbach’s alpha, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the PACT-M consists of PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2), both of which have two dimensions, the number of items in both parts are consistent with the original English language version. The Cronbach’s alpha values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were 0.802 and 0.741, and the test-retest reliability values were 0.885 and 0.837. The item content validity index and scale content validity index values of the PACT-M(1) and PACT-M(2) were all 1.0. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the PACT-M shows acceptable validity and reliability and can be used to assess the quality and safety of transitional care from hospital to home from the patient’s perspective in mainland China. BioMed Central 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8630870/ /pubmed/34844597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07298-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, La-mei Liu, Ment-ting Sun, Meng-jie Wang, Jia-nan Lin, Bei-lei Wang, Peng Li, Qiu-fang Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure |
title | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure |
title_full | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure |
title_short | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure |
title_sort | validity and reliability of the chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34844597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07298-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liulamei validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure AT liumentting validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure AT sunmengjie validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure AT wangjianan validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure AT linbeilei validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure AT wangpeng validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure AT liqiufang validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthepartnersatcaretransitionsmeasure |