Cargando…
Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend to offer supportive care during a next pregnancy to couples affected by recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). In previous research, several options for supportive care have been identified and women’s preferences have been quantified. Although it is known tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34847864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4 |
_version_ | 1784607446943137792 |
---|---|
author | du Fossé, N. A. Lashley, E. E. L. O. Treurniet, T. T. van Lith, J. M. M. le Cessie, S. Boosman, H. van der Hoorn, M. L. P. |
author_facet | du Fossé, N. A. Lashley, E. E. L. O. Treurniet, T. T. van Lith, J. M. M. le Cessie, S. Boosman, H. van der Hoorn, M. L. P. |
author_sort | du Fossé, N. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend to offer supportive care during a next pregnancy to couples affected by recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). In previous research, several options for supportive care have been identified and women’s preferences have been quantified. Although it is known that RPL impacts the mental health of both partners, male preferences for supportive care have hardly been explored. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in couples who visited a specialized RPL clinic in the Netherlands between November 2018 and December 2019. Both members of the couples received a questionnaire that quantified their preferences for supportive care in a next pregnancy and they were asked to complete this independently from each other. Preferences for each supportive care option were analysed on a group level (by gender) and on a couple level, by comparing preferences of both partners. RESULTS: Ninety-two questionnaires (completed by 46 couples) were analysed. The overall need for supportive care indicated on a scale from 1 to 10 was 6.8 for men and 7.9 for women (P = 0.002). Both genders preferred to regularly see the same doctor with knowledge of their obstetric history, to make a plan for the first trimester and to have frequent ultrasound examinations. A lower proportion of men preferred a doctor that shows understanding (80% of men vs. 100% of women, P = 0.004) and a doctor that informs on wellbeing (72% vs. 100%, P = ≤0.000). Fewer men preferred support from friends (48% vs. 74%, P = 0.017). Thirty-seven percent of men requested more involvement of the male partner at the outpatient clinic, compared to 70% of women (P = 0.007). In 28% of couples, partners had opposing preferences regarding peer support. CONCLUSIONS: While both women and men affected by RPL are in need of supportive care, their preferences may differ. Current supportive care services may not entirely address the needs of men. Health care professionals should focus on both partners and development of novel supportive care programs with specific attention for men should be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8630871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86308712021-12-01 Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care du Fossé, N. A. Lashley, E. E. L. O. Treurniet, T. T. van Lith, J. M. M. le Cessie, S. Boosman, H. van der Hoorn, M. L. P. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend to offer supportive care during a next pregnancy to couples affected by recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). In previous research, several options for supportive care have been identified and women’s preferences have been quantified. Although it is known that RPL impacts the mental health of both partners, male preferences for supportive care have hardly been explored. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in couples who visited a specialized RPL clinic in the Netherlands between November 2018 and December 2019. Both members of the couples received a questionnaire that quantified their preferences for supportive care in a next pregnancy and they were asked to complete this independently from each other. Preferences for each supportive care option were analysed on a group level (by gender) and on a couple level, by comparing preferences of both partners. RESULTS: Ninety-two questionnaires (completed by 46 couples) were analysed. The overall need for supportive care indicated on a scale from 1 to 10 was 6.8 for men and 7.9 for women (P = 0.002). Both genders preferred to regularly see the same doctor with knowledge of their obstetric history, to make a plan for the first trimester and to have frequent ultrasound examinations. A lower proportion of men preferred a doctor that shows understanding (80% of men vs. 100% of women, P = 0.004) and a doctor that informs on wellbeing (72% vs. 100%, P = ≤0.000). Fewer men preferred support from friends (48% vs. 74%, P = 0.017). Thirty-seven percent of men requested more involvement of the male partner at the outpatient clinic, compared to 70% of women (P = 0.007). In 28% of couples, partners had opposing preferences regarding peer support. CONCLUSIONS: While both women and men affected by RPL are in need of supportive care, their preferences may differ. Current supportive care services may not entirely address the needs of men. Health care professionals should focus on both partners and development of novel supportive care programs with specific attention for men should be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4. BioMed Central 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8630871/ /pubmed/34847864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research du Fossé, N. A. Lashley, E. E. L. O. Treurniet, T. T. van Lith, J. M. M. le Cessie, S. Boosman, H. van der Hoorn, M. L. P. Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care |
title | Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care |
title_full | Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care |
title_fullStr | Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care |
title_short | Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care |
title_sort | exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34847864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dufossena exploringgenderdifferencesamongcoupleswithunexplainedrecurrentpregnancylossregardingpreferencesforsupportivecare AT lashleyeelo exploringgenderdifferencesamongcoupleswithunexplainedrecurrentpregnancylossregardingpreferencesforsupportivecare AT treurniettt exploringgenderdifferencesamongcoupleswithunexplainedrecurrentpregnancylossregardingpreferencesforsupportivecare AT vanlithjmm exploringgenderdifferencesamongcoupleswithunexplainedrecurrentpregnancylossregardingpreferencesforsupportivecare AT lecessies exploringgenderdifferencesamongcoupleswithunexplainedrecurrentpregnancylossregardingpreferencesforsupportivecare AT boosmanh exploringgenderdifferencesamongcoupleswithunexplainedrecurrentpregnancylossregardingpreferencesforsupportivecare AT vanderhoornmlp exploringgenderdifferencesamongcoupleswithunexplainedrecurrentpregnancylossregardingpreferencesforsupportivecare |