Cargando…

Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil

OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided antegrade ureteral stenting between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grubert, Renata Motta, do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri, Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos, Tibana, Tiago Kojun, Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão, Marchiori, Edson, Nunes, Thiago Franchi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0131
_version_ 1784607463394246656
author Grubert, Renata Motta
do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri
Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos
Tibana, Tiago Kojun
Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão
Marchiori, Edson
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
author_facet Grubert, Renata Motta
do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri
Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos
Tibana, Tiago Kojun
Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão
Marchiori, Edson
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
author_sort Grubert, Renata Motta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided antegrade ureteral stenting between January 2016 and August 2020. We evaluated 90 patients (48 men). The mean age was 61.4 ± 15 years (range, 30-94 years). Patients were divided into two main groups: those with malignant neoplasms; and those with non-neoplastic disease. Technical and clinical success of the procedure were defined, respectively, as maintenance of the patency of the urinary tract, with a reduction in the degree of hydronephrosis, and as a reduction in the level of nitrogenous waste. Postprocedural complications were categorized as major or minor according to the CIRSE classification. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 150 antegrade stenting procedures performed in 90 patients, most of whom had previously undergone retrograde stenting that was unsuccessful. The stenting was bilateral in 60 patients and unilateral in 30. Technical success was achieved in 143 (95.3%) of the procedures, whereas seven procedures (4.6%) were unsuccessful. Failed procedures were characterized by inability to place a stent or migration of a stent after its placement. Complications occurred in 12 (8.0%) of the procedures. Of those 12 complications, two were classified as major (bleeding) and 10 were classified as minor (lumbar pain or infection). The most common techniques used were the over-the-wire technique and the modified technique (in 58.0% and 42.0% of the cases, respectively). In seven cases (4.7%), a nephrostomy tube was inserted. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting is a safe, effective method for the management of ureteral injuries and obstructions, due to malignant or benign causes, when the retrograde approach has failed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86309542021-12-02 Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil Grubert, Renata Motta do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos Tibana, Tiago Kojun Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi Radiol Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided antegrade ureteral stenting between January 2016 and August 2020. We evaluated 90 patients (48 men). The mean age was 61.4 ± 15 years (range, 30-94 years). Patients were divided into two main groups: those with malignant neoplasms; and those with non-neoplastic disease. Technical and clinical success of the procedure were defined, respectively, as maintenance of the patency of the urinary tract, with a reduction in the degree of hydronephrosis, and as a reduction in the level of nitrogenous waste. Postprocedural complications were categorized as major or minor according to the CIRSE classification. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 150 antegrade stenting procedures performed in 90 patients, most of whom had previously undergone retrograde stenting that was unsuccessful. The stenting was bilateral in 60 patients and unilateral in 30. Technical success was achieved in 143 (95.3%) of the procedures, whereas seven procedures (4.6%) were unsuccessful. Failed procedures were characterized by inability to place a stent or migration of a stent after its placement. Complications occurred in 12 (8.0%) of the procedures. Of those 12 complications, two were classified as major (bleeding) and 10 were classified as minor (lumbar pain or infection). The most common techniques used were the over-the-wire technique and the modified technique (in 58.0% and 42.0% of the cases, respectively). In seven cases (4.7%), a nephrostomy tube was inserted. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting is a safe, effective method for the management of ureteral injuries and obstructions, due to malignant or benign causes, when the retrograde approach has failed. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8630954/ /pubmed/34866694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0131 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Grubert, Renata Motta
do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri
Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos
Tibana, Tiago Kojun
Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão
Marchiori, Edson
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil
title Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil
title_full Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil
title_fullStr Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil
title_short Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil
title_sort antegrade double-j stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in brazil
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0131
work_keys_str_mv AT grubertrenatamotta antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil
AT docarmocarlosegydioferri antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil
AT moraisnetoreinaldosantos antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil
AT tibanatiagokojun antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil
AT santosromuloflorenciotristao antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil
AT marchioriedson antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil
AT nunesthiagofranchi antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil