Cargando…
Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil
OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided antegrade ureteral stenting between...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0131 |
_version_ | 1784607463394246656 |
---|---|
author | Grubert, Renata Motta do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos Tibana, Tiago Kojun Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi |
author_facet | Grubert, Renata Motta do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos Tibana, Tiago Kojun Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi |
author_sort | Grubert, Renata Motta |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided antegrade ureteral stenting between January 2016 and August 2020. We evaluated 90 patients (48 men). The mean age was 61.4 ± 15 years (range, 30-94 years). Patients were divided into two main groups: those with malignant neoplasms; and those with non-neoplastic disease. Technical and clinical success of the procedure were defined, respectively, as maintenance of the patency of the urinary tract, with a reduction in the degree of hydronephrosis, and as a reduction in the level of nitrogenous waste. Postprocedural complications were categorized as major or minor according to the CIRSE classification. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 150 antegrade stenting procedures performed in 90 patients, most of whom had previously undergone retrograde stenting that was unsuccessful. The stenting was bilateral in 60 patients and unilateral in 30. Technical success was achieved in 143 (95.3%) of the procedures, whereas seven procedures (4.6%) were unsuccessful. Failed procedures were characterized by inability to place a stent or migration of a stent after its placement. Complications occurred in 12 (8.0%) of the procedures. Of those 12 complications, two were classified as major (bleeding) and 10 were classified as minor (lumbar pain or infection). The most common techniques used were the over-the-wire technique and the modified technique (in 58.0% and 42.0% of the cases, respectively). In seven cases (4.7%), a nephrostomy tube was inserted. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting is a safe, effective method for the management of ureteral injuries and obstructions, due to malignant or benign causes, when the retrograde approach has failed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8630954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86309542021-12-02 Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil Grubert, Renata Motta do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos Tibana, Tiago Kojun Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi Radiol Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided antegrade ureteral stenting between January 2016 and August 2020. We evaluated 90 patients (48 men). The mean age was 61.4 ± 15 years (range, 30-94 years). Patients were divided into two main groups: those with malignant neoplasms; and those with non-neoplastic disease. Technical and clinical success of the procedure were defined, respectively, as maintenance of the patency of the urinary tract, with a reduction in the degree of hydronephrosis, and as a reduction in the level of nitrogenous waste. Postprocedural complications were categorized as major or minor according to the CIRSE classification. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 150 antegrade stenting procedures performed in 90 patients, most of whom had previously undergone retrograde stenting that was unsuccessful. The stenting was bilateral in 60 patients and unilateral in 30. Technical success was achieved in 143 (95.3%) of the procedures, whereas seven procedures (4.6%) were unsuccessful. Failed procedures were characterized by inability to place a stent or migration of a stent after its placement. Complications occurred in 12 (8.0%) of the procedures. Of those 12 complications, two were classified as major (bleeding) and 10 were classified as minor (lumbar pain or infection). The most common techniques used were the over-the-wire technique and the modified technique (in 58.0% and 42.0% of the cases, respectively). In seven cases (4.7%), a nephrostomy tube was inserted. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting is a safe, effective method for the management of ureteral injuries and obstructions, due to malignant or benign causes, when the retrograde approach has failed. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8630954/ /pubmed/34866694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0131 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Grubert, Renata Motta do Carmo, Carlos Egydio Ferri Morais Neto, Reinaldo Santos Tibana, Tiago Kojun Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in Brazil |
title | Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde
approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in
Brazil |
title_full | Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde
approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in
Brazil |
title_fullStr | Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde
approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in
Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde
approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in
Brazil |
title_short | Antegrade double-J stenting as an alternative to the retrograde
approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in
Brazil |
title_sort | antegrade double-j stenting as an alternative to the retrograde
approach: experience of the first 150 cases at a single center in
brazil |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grubertrenatamotta antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil AT docarmocarlosegydioferri antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil AT moraisnetoreinaldosantos antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil AT tibanatiagokojun antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil AT santosromuloflorenciotristao antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil AT marchioriedson antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil AT nunesthiagofranchi antegradedoublejstentingasanalternativetotheretrogradeapproachexperienceofthefirst150casesatasinglecenterinbrazil |