Cargando…

Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review

The purpose of this review was to analyze how the retraction and protection of lingual flap (LF+) could influence the incidence of lingual nerve injury (LNI) during third molar extraction, as compared with protocols that do not involve handling of lingual tissue (LF). A literature review was perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petroni, Giulia, Passaretti, Alfredo, Zaccheo, Fabrizio, Di Nardo, Dario, Testarelli, Luca, Cicconetti, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730042
_version_ 1784607464374665216
author Petroni, Giulia
Passaretti, Alfredo
Zaccheo, Fabrizio
Di Nardo, Dario
Testarelli, Luca
Cicconetti, Andrea
author_facet Petroni, Giulia
Passaretti, Alfredo
Zaccheo, Fabrizio
Di Nardo, Dario
Testarelli, Luca
Cicconetti, Andrea
author_sort Petroni, Giulia
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this review was to analyze how the retraction and protection of lingual flap (LF+) could influence the incidence of lingual nerve injury (LNI) during third molar extraction, as compared with protocols that do not involve handling of lingual tissue (LF). A literature review was performed from the “Medline” and “Scopus” medical databases, using the keywords “lingual nerve” and “third molar surgery.” From the selected articles, the mean values for transitory and permanent LNI’s incidence were elaborated, taking into account the group treated with LF+ technique and the group treated with LF technique. Of 480 articles, 11 studies were included in the review. The LF+ group counted 3,866 surgeries and it resulted in a transitory LNI’s mean incidence of 2.98 ± 0.03% and a mean incidence of 0.1 ± 0.003% for permanent LNI. The LF group counted 5,938 surgeries with, respectively, 1.92 ± 0.02 and 0.49 ± 0.006% of transitory and permanent LNI’s incidence mean values. The results of this study suggest that the application of LF+ techniques reduces the risk of damage and injuries of lingual nerve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86309582021-12-02 Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review Petroni, Giulia Passaretti, Alfredo Zaccheo, Fabrizio Di Nardo, Dario Testarelli, Luca Cicconetti, Andrea Eur J Dent The purpose of this review was to analyze how the retraction and protection of lingual flap (LF+) could influence the incidence of lingual nerve injury (LNI) during third molar extraction, as compared with protocols that do not involve handling of lingual tissue (LF). A literature review was performed from the “Medline” and “Scopus” medical databases, using the keywords “lingual nerve” and “third molar surgery.” From the selected articles, the mean values for transitory and permanent LNI’s incidence were elaborated, taking into account the group treated with LF+ technique and the group treated with LF technique. Of 480 articles, 11 studies were included in the review. The LF+ group counted 3,866 surgeries and it resulted in a transitory LNI’s mean incidence of 2.98 ± 0.03% and a mean incidence of 0.1 ± 0.003% for permanent LNI. The LF group counted 5,938 surgeries with, respectively, 1.92 ± 0.02 and 0.49 ± 0.006% of transitory and permanent LNI’s incidence mean values. The results of this study suggest that the application of LF+ techniques reduces the risk of damage and injuries of lingual nerve. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8630958/ /pubmed/34388831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730042 Text en European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Petroni, Giulia
Passaretti, Alfredo
Zaccheo, Fabrizio
Di Nardo, Dario
Testarelli, Luca
Cicconetti, Andrea
Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review
title Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review
title_full Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review
title_short Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review
title_sort lingual flap protection during third molar surgery: a literature review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730042
work_keys_str_mv AT petronigiulia lingualflapprotectionduringthirdmolarsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT passarettialfredo lingualflapprotectionduringthirdmolarsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT zaccheofabrizio lingualflapprotectionduringthirdmolarsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT dinardodario lingualflapprotectionduringthirdmolarsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT testarelliluca lingualflapprotectionduringthirdmolarsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT cicconettiandrea lingualflapprotectionduringthirdmolarsurgeryaliteraturereview