Cargando…

Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of significant hepatic graft steatosis remains vital for success of any transplant program as it has an impact on donor morbidity and recipient survival. Even histopathological quantification faces limitations. The present study compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT-LAI and MR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhary, Abhideep, Sood, Gaurav, Kumar, Niteen, Chauhan, Chandraprakash, Yadav, Dhirendra Pratap Singh, Kasana, Vivek, Arora, Raman, Gangwani, Gaurav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824190
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.933801
_version_ 1784607469970915328
author Chaudhary, Abhideep
Sood, Gaurav
Kumar, Niteen
Chauhan, Chandraprakash
Yadav, Dhirendra Pratap Singh
Kasana, Vivek
Arora, Raman
Gangwani, Gaurav
author_facet Chaudhary, Abhideep
Sood, Gaurav
Kumar, Niteen
Chauhan, Chandraprakash
Yadav, Dhirendra Pratap Singh
Kasana, Vivek
Arora, Raman
Gangwani, Gaurav
author_sort Chaudhary, Abhideep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of significant hepatic graft steatosis remains vital for success of any transplant program as it has an impact on donor morbidity and recipient survival. Even histopathological quantification faces limitations. The present study compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT-LAI and MRI fat fraction imaging with histopathological analysis for donor graft parenchymal fat quantification. MATERIAL/METHODS: CT-LAI and MR-FF values and histopathological fat quantification results of 273 patients were identified from electronic records of the author’s institutes from September 2015 to April 2020. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 21.0. RESULTS: Most participants were young with nearly equal sex distribution and significant number of overweight and obese patients. Moderate agreement and significant positive correlation were found between MR fat fraction (%) and biopsy-macrosteatosis (%). Diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value of MRI for fat fraction calculation was high (95.24% and 98.07% for fat fraction of 10% threshold, respectively), and it further improved for fat fraction threshold of 15%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based fat quantification calculation displayed near-perfect negative predictive values and very high diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that it can obviate the need for biopsy in patients with graft fat percentage <10% on MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86309862021-12-16 Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors Chaudhary, Abhideep Sood, Gaurav Kumar, Niteen Chauhan, Chandraprakash Yadav, Dhirendra Pratap Singh Kasana, Vivek Arora, Raman Gangwani, Gaurav Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of significant hepatic graft steatosis remains vital for success of any transplant program as it has an impact on donor morbidity and recipient survival. Even histopathological quantification faces limitations. The present study compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT-LAI and MRI fat fraction imaging with histopathological analysis for donor graft parenchymal fat quantification. MATERIAL/METHODS: CT-LAI and MR-FF values and histopathological fat quantification results of 273 patients were identified from electronic records of the author’s institutes from September 2015 to April 2020. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 21.0. RESULTS: Most participants were young with nearly equal sex distribution and significant number of overweight and obese patients. Moderate agreement and significant positive correlation were found between MR fat fraction (%) and biopsy-macrosteatosis (%). Diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value of MRI for fat fraction calculation was high (95.24% and 98.07% for fat fraction of 10% threshold, respectively), and it further improved for fat fraction threshold of 15%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based fat quantification calculation displayed near-perfect negative predictive values and very high diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that it can obviate the need for biopsy in patients with graft fat percentage <10% on MRI. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8630986/ /pubmed/34824190 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.933801 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chaudhary, Abhideep
Sood, Gaurav
Kumar, Niteen
Chauhan, Chandraprakash
Yadav, Dhirendra Pratap Singh
Kasana, Vivek
Arora, Raman
Gangwani, Gaurav
Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors
title Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors
title_full Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors
title_fullStr Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors
title_short Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors
title_sort validation of accuracy of non-invasive imaging methods (magnetic resonance imaging (mri) fat fraction calculation and computed tomography (ct) liver attenuation index) for hepatic graft fat quantification in living liver transplant donors
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824190
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.933801
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudharyabhideep validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors
AT soodgaurav validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors
AT kumarniteen validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors
AT chauhanchandraprakash validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors
AT yadavdhirendrapratapsingh validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors
AT kasanavivek validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors
AT aroraraman validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors
AT gangwanigaurav validationofaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingmethodsmagneticresonanceimagingmrifatfractioncalculationandcomputedtomographyctliverattenuationindexforhepaticgraftfatquantificationinlivinglivertransplantdonors