Cargando…

Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement

Background: The upper physiological threshold for tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) of 2.8 m/s proposed by the Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) guidelines had been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative PH in patients with aortic stenosis, long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia-Ribas, Cora, Ble, Mirea, Gómez, Miquel, Mas-Stachurska, Aleksandra, Farré-López, Núria, Cladellas, Mercè
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8631497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.720643
_version_ 1784607574023208960
author Garcia-Ribas, Cora
Ble, Mirea
Gómez, Miquel
Mas-Stachurska, Aleksandra
Farré-López, Núria
Cladellas, Mercè
author_facet Garcia-Ribas, Cora
Ble, Mirea
Gómez, Miquel
Mas-Stachurska, Aleksandra
Farré-López, Núria
Cladellas, Mercè
author_sort Garcia-Ribas, Cora
collection PubMed
description Background: The upper physiological threshold for tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) of 2.8 m/s proposed by the Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) guidelines had been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative PH in patients with aortic stenosis, long-term after valve replacement, using two different TRV thresholds (2.55 and 2.8 m/s). Methods: Four hundred and forty four patients were included (mean age 73 ± 9 years; 55% male), with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (98% completed). Patients were divided into three PH probability groups according to guidelines (low, intermediate and high) for both thresholds (TRV ≤ 2.8 m/s and TRV ≤ 2.55 m/s), using right atrial area>18 cm(2) and right ventricle/left ventricle ratio>1 as additional echocardiographic variables. Results: In patients with measurable TRV (n = 304), the low group mortality rate was 25% and 30%, respectively for 2.55 and 2.8 m/s TRV thresholds. The intermediate group with TRV > 2.55 m/s was an independent mortality risk factor (HR 2.04; 95% CI: 1.91 to 3.48, p = 0.01), in contrast to the intermediate group with TRV>2.8 m/s (HR 1.44; 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.32, p = 0.14). Both high probability groups were associated with an increased mortality risk, as compared to their respective low groups. When including all patients (with measurable and non-measurable TRV), both intermediate groups remained independently associated with an increased mortality risk: HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.35 p = 0.01) for the new cut-off point; and HR 1.43 (95% CI: 0.96 to 2.13, p = 0.07) for guidelines threshold. Conclusion: A TRV threshold of 2.55 m/s, together with right cavities measures, allowed a better risk assessment of patients with PH secondary to severe aortic stenosis, with or without tricuspid regurgitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8631497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86314972021-12-01 Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement Garcia-Ribas, Cora Ble, Mirea Gómez, Miquel Mas-Stachurska, Aleksandra Farré-López, Núria Cladellas, Mercè Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: The upper physiological threshold for tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) of 2.8 m/s proposed by the Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) guidelines had been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative PH in patients with aortic stenosis, long-term after valve replacement, using two different TRV thresholds (2.55 and 2.8 m/s). Methods: Four hundred and forty four patients were included (mean age 73 ± 9 years; 55% male), with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (98% completed). Patients were divided into three PH probability groups according to guidelines (low, intermediate and high) for both thresholds (TRV ≤ 2.8 m/s and TRV ≤ 2.55 m/s), using right atrial area>18 cm(2) and right ventricle/left ventricle ratio>1 as additional echocardiographic variables. Results: In patients with measurable TRV (n = 304), the low group mortality rate was 25% and 30%, respectively for 2.55 and 2.8 m/s TRV thresholds. The intermediate group with TRV > 2.55 m/s was an independent mortality risk factor (HR 2.04; 95% CI: 1.91 to 3.48, p = 0.01), in contrast to the intermediate group with TRV>2.8 m/s (HR 1.44; 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.32, p = 0.14). Both high probability groups were associated with an increased mortality risk, as compared to their respective low groups. When including all patients (with measurable and non-measurable TRV), both intermediate groups remained independently associated with an increased mortality risk: HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.35 p = 0.01) for the new cut-off point; and HR 1.43 (95% CI: 0.96 to 2.13, p = 0.07) for guidelines threshold. Conclusion: A TRV threshold of 2.55 m/s, together with right cavities measures, allowed a better risk assessment of patients with PH secondary to severe aortic stenosis, with or without tricuspid regurgitation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8631497/ /pubmed/34859063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.720643 Text en Copyright © 2021 Garcia-Ribas, Ble, Gómez, Mas-Stachurska, Farré-López and Cladellas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Garcia-Ribas, Cora
Ble, Mirea
Gómez, Miquel
Mas-Stachurska, Aleksandra
Farré-López, Núria
Cladellas, Mercè
Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement
title Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement
title_full Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement
title_fullStr Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement
title_short Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement
title_sort importance of tricuspid regurgitation velocity threshold in risk assessment of pulmonary hypertension-long-term outcome of patients submitted to aortic valve replacement
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8631497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.720643
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaribascora importanceoftricuspidregurgitationvelocitythresholdinriskassessmentofpulmonaryhypertensionlongtermoutcomeofpatientssubmittedtoaorticvalvereplacement
AT blemirea importanceoftricuspidregurgitationvelocitythresholdinriskassessmentofpulmonaryhypertensionlongtermoutcomeofpatientssubmittedtoaorticvalvereplacement
AT gomezmiquel importanceoftricuspidregurgitationvelocitythresholdinriskassessmentofpulmonaryhypertensionlongtermoutcomeofpatientssubmittedtoaorticvalvereplacement
AT masstachurskaaleksandra importanceoftricuspidregurgitationvelocitythresholdinriskassessmentofpulmonaryhypertensionlongtermoutcomeofpatientssubmittedtoaorticvalvereplacement
AT farrelopeznuria importanceoftricuspidregurgitationvelocitythresholdinriskassessmentofpulmonaryhypertensionlongtermoutcomeofpatientssubmittedtoaorticvalvereplacement
AT cladellasmerce importanceoftricuspidregurgitationvelocitythresholdinriskassessmentofpulmonaryhypertensionlongtermoutcomeofpatientssubmittedtoaorticvalvereplacement