Cargando…
Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States
Despite calls for political consensus, there is growing evidence that the public response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been politicized in the US. We examined the extent to which this polarization exists among the US public across two national studies. In a representative US sample (N = 699, March 2...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8631569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892 |
_version_ | 1784607591952809984 |
---|---|
author | Kerr, John Panagopoulos, Costas van der Linden, Sander |
author_facet | Kerr, John Panagopoulos, Costas van der Linden, Sander |
author_sort | Kerr, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite calls for political consensus, there is growing evidence that the public response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been politicized in the US. We examined the extent to which this polarization exists among the US public across two national studies. In a representative US sample (N = 699, March 2020) we find that liberals (compared to conservatives) perceive higher risk, place less trust in politicians to handle the pandemic, are more trusting of medical experts such as the WHO, and are more critical of the government response. We replicate these results in a second, pre-registered study (N = 1000; April 2020), and find that results are similar when considering partisanship, rather than political ideology. In both studies we also find evidence that political polarization extends beyond attitudes, with liberals consistently reporting engaging in a significantly greater number of health protective behaviors (e.g., wearing face masks) than conservatives. We discuss the possible drivers of polarization on COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors, and reiterate the need for fostering bipartisan consensus to effectively address and manage the COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8631569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86315692021-12-01 Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States Kerr, John Panagopoulos, Costas van der Linden, Sander Pers Individ Dif Article Despite calls for political consensus, there is growing evidence that the public response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been politicized in the US. We examined the extent to which this polarization exists among the US public across two national studies. In a representative US sample (N = 699, March 2020) we find that liberals (compared to conservatives) perceive higher risk, place less trust in politicians to handle the pandemic, are more trusting of medical experts such as the WHO, and are more critical of the government response. We replicate these results in a second, pre-registered study (N = 1000; April 2020), and find that results are similar when considering partisanship, rather than political ideology. In both studies we also find evidence that political polarization extends beyond attitudes, with liberals consistently reporting engaging in a significantly greater number of health protective behaviors (e.g., wearing face masks) than conservatives. We discuss the possible drivers of polarization on COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors, and reiterate the need for fostering bipartisan consensus to effectively address and manage the COVID-19 pandemic. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-09 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8631569/ /pubmed/34866723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Kerr, John Panagopoulos, Costas van der Linden, Sander Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States |
title | Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States |
title_full | Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States |
title_fullStr | Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States |
title_short | Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States |
title_sort | political polarization on covid-19 pandemic response in the united states |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8631569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kerrjohn politicalpolarizationoncovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedstates AT panagopouloscostas politicalpolarizationoncovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedstates AT vanderlindensander politicalpolarizationoncovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedstates |