Cargando…
Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning
In this study, 38 young adults participated in a probabilistic A/B prototype category learning task under observational and feedback-based conditions. The study compared learning success (testing accuracy) and strategy use (multi-cue vs. single feature vs. random pattern) between training conditions...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8631756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672330 |
_version_ | 1784607627575033856 |
---|---|
author | Tilton-Bolowsky, Victoria Vallila-Rohter, Sofia Arbel, Yael |
author_facet | Tilton-Bolowsky, Victoria Vallila-Rohter, Sofia Arbel, Yael |
author_sort | Tilton-Bolowsky, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, 38 young adults participated in a probabilistic A/B prototype category learning task under observational and feedback-based conditions. The study compared learning success (testing accuracy) and strategy use (multi-cue vs. single feature vs. random pattern) between training conditions. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a event related potentials were measured to explore the relationships between feedback processing and strategy use under a probabilistic paradigm. A greater number of participants were found to utilize an optimal, multi-cue strategy following feedback-based training than observational training, adding to the body of research suggesting that feedback can influence learning approach. There was a significant interaction between training phase and strategy on FRN amplitude. Specifically, participants who used a strategy in which category membership was determined by a single feature (single feature strategy) exhibited a significant decrease in FRN amplitude from early training to late training, perhaps due to reduced utilization of feedback or reduced prediction error. There were no significant main or interaction effects between valence, training phase, or strategy on P3a amplitude. Findings are consistent with prior research suggesting that learners vary in their approach to learning and that training method influences learning. Findings also suggest that measures of feedback processing during probabilistic category learning may reflect changes in feedback utilization and may further illuminate differences among individual learners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8631756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86317562021-12-01 Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning Tilton-Bolowsky, Victoria Vallila-Rohter, Sofia Arbel, Yael Front Psychol Psychology In this study, 38 young adults participated in a probabilistic A/B prototype category learning task under observational and feedback-based conditions. The study compared learning success (testing accuracy) and strategy use (multi-cue vs. single feature vs. random pattern) between training conditions. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a event related potentials were measured to explore the relationships between feedback processing and strategy use under a probabilistic paradigm. A greater number of participants were found to utilize an optimal, multi-cue strategy following feedback-based training than observational training, adding to the body of research suggesting that feedback can influence learning approach. There was a significant interaction between training phase and strategy on FRN amplitude. Specifically, participants who used a strategy in which category membership was determined by a single feature (single feature strategy) exhibited a significant decrease in FRN amplitude from early training to late training, perhaps due to reduced utilization of feedback or reduced prediction error. There were no significant main or interaction effects between valence, training phase, or strategy on P3a amplitude. Findings are consistent with prior research suggesting that learners vary in their approach to learning and that training method influences learning. Findings also suggest that measures of feedback processing during probabilistic category learning may reflect changes in feedback utilization and may further illuminate differences among individual learners. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8631756/ /pubmed/34858246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672330 Text en Copyright © 2021 Tilton-Bolowsky, Vallila-Rohter and Arbel. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Tilton-Bolowsky, Victoria Vallila-Rohter, Sofia Arbel, Yael Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning |
title | Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning |
title_full | Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning |
title_fullStr | Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning |
title_short | Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning |
title_sort | strategy development and feedback processing during complex category learning |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8631756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tiltonbolowskyvictoria strategydevelopmentandfeedbackprocessingduringcomplexcategorylearning AT vallilarohtersofia strategydevelopmentandfeedbackprocessingduringcomplexcategorylearning AT arbelyael strategydevelopmentandfeedbackprocessingduringcomplexcategorylearning |