Cargando…

Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes

Study Objective: Evaluate the effects of a fast-track (FT) protocol on costs and post-operative recovery. Methods: One hundred and seventy women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication were randomized in a FT protocol or a usual care protocol. A FT protocol included the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambat Emery, Shahzia, Brossard, Philippe, Petignat, Patrick, Boulvain, Michel, Pluchino, Nicola, Dällenbach, Patrick, Wenger, Jean-Marie, Savoldelli, Georges L., Rehberg-Klug, Benno, Dubuisson, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.773653
_version_ 1784607718801145856
author Lambat Emery, Shahzia
Brossard, Philippe
Petignat, Patrick
Boulvain, Michel
Pluchino, Nicola
Dällenbach, Patrick
Wenger, Jean-Marie
Savoldelli, Georges L.
Rehberg-Klug, Benno
Dubuisson, Jean
author_facet Lambat Emery, Shahzia
Brossard, Philippe
Petignat, Patrick
Boulvain, Michel
Pluchino, Nicola
Dällenbach, Patrick
Wenger, Jean-Marie
Savoldelli, Georges L.
Rehberg-Klug, Benno
Dubuisson, Jean
author_sort Lambat Emery, Shahzia
collection PubMed
description Study Objective: Evaluate the effects of a fast-track (FT) protocol on costs and post-operative recovery. Methods: One hundred and seventy women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication were randomized in a FT protocol or a usual care protocol. A FT protocol included the combination of minimally invasive surgery, analgesia optimization, early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization of patients was compared to a usual care protocol. Primary outcome was costs. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, post-operative morbidity and patient satisfaction. Main Results: The mean total cost in the FT group was 13,070 ± 4,321 Euros (EUR) per patient, and that in the usual care group was 3.5% higher at 13,527 ± 3,925 EUR (p = 0.49). The FT group had lower inpatient surgical costs but higher total ambulatory costs during the first post-operative month. The mean hospital stay in the FT group was 52.7 ± 26.8 h, and that in the usual care group was 20% higher at 65.8 ± 33.7 h (p = 0.006). Morbidity during the first post-operative month was not significantly different between the two groups. On their day of discharge, the proportion of patients satisfied with pain management was similar in both groups [83% in FT and 78% in the usual care group (p = 0.57)]. Satisfaction with medical follow-up 1 month after surgery was also similar [91% in FT and 88% in the usual care group (p = 0.69)]. Conclusion: Implementation of a FT protocol in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications has minimal non-significant effects on costs but significantly reduces hospital stay without increasing post-operative morbidity nor decreasing patient satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04839263.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8632235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86322352021-12-01 Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes Lambat Emery, Shahzia Brossard, Philippe Petignat, Patrick Boulvain, Michel Pluchino, Nicola Dällenbach, Patrick Wenger, Jean-Marie Savoldelli, Georges L. Rehberg-Klug, Benno Dubuisson, Jean Front Surg Surgery Study Objective: Evaluate the effects of a fast-track (FT) protocol on costs and post-operative recovery. Methods: One hundred and seventy women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication were randomized in a FT protocol or a usual care protocol. A FT protocol included the combination of minimally invasive surgery, analgesia optimization, early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization of patients was compared to a usual care protocol. Primary outcome was costs. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, post-operative morbidity and patient satisfaction. Main Results: The mean total cost in the FT group was 13,070 ± 4,321 Euros (EUR) per patient, and that in the usual care group was 3.5% higher at 13,527 ± 3,925 EUR (p = 0.49). The FT group had lower inpatient surgical costs but higher total ambulatory costs during the first post-operative month. The mean hospital stay in the FT group was 52.7 ± 26.8 h, and that in the usual care group was 20% higher at 65.8 ± 33.7 h (p = 0.006). Morbidity during the first post-operative month was not significantly different between the two groups. On their day of discharge, the proportion of patients satisfied with pain management was similar in both groups [83% in FT and 78% in the usual care group (p = 0.57)]. Satisfaction with medical follow-up 1 month after surgery was also similar [91% in FT and 88% in the usual care group (p = 0.69)]. Conclusion: Implementation of a FT protocol in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications has minimal non-significant effects on costs but significantly reduces hospital stay without increasing post-operative morbidity nor decreasing patient satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04839263. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8632235/ /pubmed/34859043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.773653 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lambat Emery, Brossard, Petignat, Boulvain, Pluchino, Dällenbach, Wenger, Savoldelli, Rehberg-Klug and Dubuisson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Lambat Emery, Shahzia
Brossard, Philippe
Petignat, Patrick
Boulvain, Michel
Pluchino, Nicola
Dällenbach, Patrick
Wenger, Jean-Marie
Savoldelli, Georges L.
Rehberg-Klug, Benno
Dubuisson, Jean
Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes
title Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes
title_full Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes
title_short Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes
title_sort fast-track in minimally invasive gynecology: a randomized trial comparing costs and clinical outcomes
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.773653
work_keys_str_mv AT lambatemeryshahzia fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT brossardphilippe fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT petignatpatrick fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT boulvainmichel fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT pluchinonicola fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT dallenbachpatrick fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT wengerjeanmarie fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT savoldelligeorgesl fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT rehbergklugbenno fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes
AT dubuissonjean fasttrackinminimallyinvasivegynecologyarandomizedtrialcomparingcostsandclinicaloutcomes