Cargando…
Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes
From a mechanical viewpoint, petioles of foliage leaves are subject to contradictory mechanical requirements. High flexural rigidity guarantees support of the lamina and low torsional rigidity ensures streamlining of the leaves in wind. This mechanical trade-off between flexural and torsional rigidi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.765605 |
_version_ | 1784607773952049152 |
---|---|
author | Langer, Max Kelbel, Mark C. Speck, Thomas Müller, Claas Speck, Olga |
author_facet | Langer, Max Kelbel, Mark C. Speck, Thomas Müller, Claas Speck, Olga |
author_sort | Langer, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | From a mechanical viewpoint, petioles of foliage leaves are subject to contradictory mechanical requirements. High flexural rigidity guarantees support of the lamina and low torsional rigidity ensures streamlining of the leaves in wind. This mechanical trade-off between flexural and torsional rigidity is described by the twist-to-bend ratio. The safety factor describes the maximum load capacity. We selected four herbaceous species with different body plans (monocotyledonous, dicotyledonous) and spatial configurations of petiole and lamina (2-dimensional, 3-dimensional) and carried out morphological-anatomical studies, two-point bending tests and torsional tests on the petioles to analyze the influence of geometry, size and shape on their twist-to-bend ratio and safety factor. The monocotyledons studied had significantly higher twist-to-bend ratios (23.7 and 39.2) than the dicotyledons (11.5 and 13.3). High twist-to-bend ratios can be geometry-based, which is true for the U-profile of Hosta x tardiana with a ratio of axial second moment of area to torsion constant of over 1.0. High twist-to-bend ratios can also be material-based, as found for the petioles of Caladium bicolor with a ratio of bending elastic modulus and torsional modulus of 64. The safety factors range between 1.7 and 2.9, meaning that each petiole can support about double to triple the leaf’s weight. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8632552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86325522021-12-01 Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes Langer, Max Kelbel, Mark C. Speck, Thomas Müller, Claas Speck, Olga Front Plant Sci Plant Science From a mechanical viewpoint, petioles of foliage leaves are subject to contradictory mechanical requirements. High flexural rigidity guarantees support of the lamina and low torsional rigidity ensures streamlining of the leaves in wind. This mechanical trade-off between flexural and torsional rigidity is described by the twist-to-bend ratio. The safety factor describes the maximum load capacity. We selected four herbaceous species with different body plans (monocotyledonous, dicotyledonous) and spatial configurations of petiole and lamina (2-dimensional, 3-dimensional) and carried out morphological-anatomical studies, two-point bending tests and torsional tests on the petioles to analyze the influence of geometry, size and shape on their twist-to-bend ratio and safety factor. The monocotyledons studied had significantly higher twist-to-bend ratios (23.7 and 39.2) than the dicotyledons (11.5 and 13.3). High twist-to-bend ratios can be geometry-based, which is true for the U-profile of Hosta x tardiana with a ratio of axial second moment of area to torsion constant of over 1.0. High twist-to-bend ratios can also be material-based, as found for the petioles of Caladium bicolor with a ratio of bending elastic modulus and torsional modulus of 64. The safety factors range between 1.7 and 2.9, meaning that each petiole can support about double to triple the leaf’s weight. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8632552/ /pubmed/34858462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.765605 Text en Copyright © 2021 Langer, Kelbel, Speck, Müller and Speck. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Langer, Max Kelbel, Mark C. Speck, Thomas Müller, Claas Speck, Olga Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes |
title | Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes |
title_full | Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes |
title_fullStr | Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes |
title_full_unstemmed | Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes |
title_short | Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes |
title_sort | twist-to-bend ratios and safety factors of petioles having various geometries, sizes and shapes |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.765605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langermax twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes AT kelbelmarkc twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes AT speckthomas twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes AT mullerclaas twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes AT speckolga twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes |