Cargando…

Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes

From a mechanical viewpoint, petioles of foliage leaves are subject to contradictory mechanical requirements. High flexural rigidity guarantees support of the lamina and low torsional rigidity ensures streamlining of the leaves in wind. This mechanical trade-off between flexural and torsional rigidi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langer, Max, Kelbel, Mark C., Speck, Thomas, Müller, Claas, Speck, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858462
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.765605
_version_ 1784607773952049152
author Langer, Max
Kelbel, Mark C.
Speck, Thomas
Müller, Claas
Speck, Olga
author_facet Langer, Max
Kelbel, Mark C.
Speck, Thomas
Müller, Claas
Speck, Olga
author_sort Langer, Max
collection PubMed
description From a mechanical viewpoint, petioles of foliage leaves are subject to contradictory mechanical requirements. High flexural rigidity guarantees support of the lamina and low torsional rigidity ensures streamlining of the leaves in wind. This mechanical trade-off between flexural and torsional rigidity is described by the twist-to-bend ratio. The safety factor describes the maximum load capacity. We selected four herbaceous species with different body plans (monocotyledonous, dicotyledonous) and spatial configurations of petiole and lamina (2-dimensional, 3-dimensional) and carried out morphological-anatomical studies, two-point bending tests and torsional tests on the petioles to analyze the influence of geometry, size and shape on their twist-to-bend ratio and safety factor. The monocotyledons studied had significantly higher twist-to-bend ratios (23.7 and 39.2) than the dicotyledons (11.5 and 13.3). High twist-to-bend ratios can be geometry-based, which is true for the U-profile of Hosta x tardiana with a ratio of axial second moment of area to torsion constant of over 1.0. High twist-to-bend ratios can also be material-based, as found for the petioles of Caladium bicolor with a ratio of bending elastic modulus and torsional modulus of 64. The safety factors range between 1.7 and 2.9, meaning that each petiole can support about double to triple the leaf’s weight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8632552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86325522021-12-01 Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes Langer, Max Kelbel, Mark C. Speck, Thomas Müller, Claas Speck, Olga Front Plant Sci Plant Science From a mechanical viewpoint, petioles of foliage leaves are subject to contradictory mechanical requirements. High flexural rigidity guarantees support of the lamina and low torsional rigidity ensures streamlining of the leaves in wind. This mechanical trade-off between flexural and torsional rigidity is described by the twist-to-bend ratio. The safety factor describes the maximum load capacity. We selected four herbaceous species with different body plans (monocotyledonous, dicotyledonous) and spatial configurations of petiole and lamina (2-dimensional, 3-dimensional) and carried out morphological-anatomical studies, two-point bending tests and torsional tests on the petioles to analyze the influence of geometry, size and shape on their twist-to-bend ratio and safety factor. The monocotyledons studied had significantly higher twist-to-bend ratios (23.7 and 39.2) than the dicotyledons (11.5 and 13.3). High twist-to-bend ratios can be geometry-based, which is true for the U-profile of Hosta x tardiana with a ratio of axial second moment of area to torsion constant of over 1.0. High twist-to-bend ratios can also be material-based, as found for the petioles of Caladium bicolor with a ratio of bending elastic modulus and torsional modulus of 64. The safety factors range between 1.7 and 2.9, meaning that each petiole can support about double to triple the leaf’s weight. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8632552/ /pubmed/34858462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.765605 Text en Copyright © 2021 Langer, Kelbel, Speck, Müller and Speck. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Langer, Max
Kelbel, Mark C.
Speck, Thomas
Müller, Claas
Speck, Olga
Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes
title Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes
title_full Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes
title_fullStr Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes
title_full_unstemmed Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes
title_short Twist-to-Bend Ratios and Safety Factors of Petioles Having Various Geometries, Sizes and Shapes
title_sort twist-to-bend ratios and safety factors of petioles having various geometries, sizes and shapes
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858462
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.765605
work_keys_str_mv AT langermax twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes
AT kelbelmarkc twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes
AT speckthomas twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes
AT mullerclaas twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes
AT speckolga twisttobendratiosandsafetyfactorsofpetioleshavingvariousgeometriessizesandshapes