Cargando…

Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus conventional TACE (cTACE), both combined with apatinib, and to establish predictive nomograms to support individualized survival prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouyang, Tao, Liu, Junxia, Shi, Chengyang, Zhu, Lisheng, Guo, Xiaopeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858890
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S338309
_version_ 1784607783061028864
author Ouyang, Tao
Liu, Junxia
Shi, Chengyang
Zhu, Lisheng
Guo, Xiaopeng
author_facet Ouyang, Tao
Liu, Junxia
Shi, Chengyang
Zhu, Lisheng
Guo, Xiaopeng
author_sort Ouyang, Tao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus conventional TACE (cTACE), both combined with apatinib, and to establish predictive nomograms to support individualized survival prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study assessed HCC patients from June 2015 to December 2019. Patients were classified as DEB-TACE plus apatinib (D-apatinib) and cTACE plus apatinib (c-apatinib). The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The nomograms were constructed, and the C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration curves were used to validate the nomograms. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to reduce patient selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were included. After PSM analysis, 58 pairs of patients were selected. Before PSM analysis, the median OS and PFS were 21.0 and 8.0 months in the D-apatinib group, respectively, which were better than the 18.0 and 5.0 months observed in the c-apatinib group (P < 0.05). The complete response (CR) rate and objective response rate (ORR) of the D-apatinib group were higher than those of the c-apatinib group. The C-index values of the nomograms in the D-apatinib group and the c-apatinib group were 0.826 and 0.802, and the area under the curve (AUC) values in the ROC curve were 0.934 and 0.892. After PSM analysis, the survival of patients treated with D-apatinib was better than that of patients treated with c-apatinib (P < 0.05). The C-index values were 0.854 and 0.794 in the D-apatinib group and the c-apatinib group, respectively, and the AUC values were 0.960 and 0.890. The incidence of adverse events was higher in the c-apatinib group. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE in combination with apatinib showed better treatment effectiveness for unresectable HCC. The nomograms can identify HCC patients who may benefit most from the treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8632616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86326162021-12-01 Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study Ouyang, Tao Liu, Junxia Shi, Chengyang Zhu, Lisheng Guo, Xiaopeng J Hepatocell Carcinoma Original Research PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus conventional TACE (cTACE), both combined with apatinib, and to establish predictive nomograms to support individualized survival prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study assessed HCC patients from June 2015 to December 2019. Patients were classified as DEB-TACE plus apatinib (D-apatinib) and cTACE plus apatinib (c-apatinib). The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The nomograms were constructed, and the C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration curves were used to validate the nomograms. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to reduce patient selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were included. After PSM analysis, 58 pairs of patients were selected. Before PSM analysis, the median OS and PFS were 21.0 and 8.0 months in the D-apatinib group, respectively, which were better than the 18.0 and 5.0 months observed in the c-apatinib group (P < 0.05). The complete response (CR) rate and objective response rate (ORR) of the D-apatinib group were higher than those of the c-apatinib group. The C-index values of the nomograms in the D-apatinib group and the c-apatinib group were 0.826 and 0.802, and the area under the curve (AUC) values in the ROC curve were 0.934 and 0.892. After PSM analysis, the survival of patients treated with D-apatinib was better than that of patients treated with c-apatinib (P < 0.05). The C-index values were 0.854 and 0.794 in the D-apatinib group and the c-apatinib group, respectively, and the AUC values were 0.960 and 0.890. The incidence of adverse events was higher in the c-apatinib group. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE in combination with apatinib showed better treatment effectiveness for unresectable HCC. The nomograms can identify HCC patients who may benefit most from the treatment. Dove 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8632616/ /pubmed/34858890 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S338309 Text en © 2021 Ouyang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ouyang, Tao
Liu, Junxia
Shi, Chengyang
Zhu, Lisheng
Guo, Xiaopeng
Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study
title Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study
title_full Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study
title_fullStr Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study
title_full_unstemmed Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study
title_short Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study
title_sort drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization both combined apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, propensity-score matched study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858890
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S338309
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangtao drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationversusconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationbothcombinedapatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy
AT liujunxia drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationversusconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationbothcombinedapatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy
AT shichengyang drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationversusconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationbothcombinedapatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy
AT zhulisheng drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationversusconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationbothcombinedapatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy
AT guoxiaopeng drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationversusconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationbothcombinedapatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy