Cargando…

Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic

The use of positron emission tomography (PET) as the initial or sole biomarker of β-amyloid (Aβ) brain pathology may inhibit Alzheimer’s disease (AD) drug development and clinical use due to cost, access, and tolerability. We developed a qEEG-ML algorithm to predict Aβ pathology among subjective cog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Nam Heon, Yang, Dong Won, Choi, Seong Hye, Kang, Seung Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2021.755499
_version_ 1784607787157815296
author Kim, Nam Heon
Yang, Dong Won
Choi, Seong Hye
Kang, Seung Wan
author_facet Kim, Nam Heon
Yang, Dong Won
Choi, Seong Hye
Kang, Seung Wan
author_sort Kim, Nam Heon
collection PubMed
description The use of positron emission tomography (PET) as the initial or sole biomarker of β-amyloid (Aβ) brain pathology may inhibit Alzheimer’s disease (AD) drug development and clinical use due to cost, access, and tolerability. We developed a qEEG-ML algorithm to predict Aβ pathology among subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and validated it using Aβ PET. We compared QEEG data between patients with MCI and those with SCD with and without PET-confirmed beta-amyloid plaque. We compared resting-state eyes-closed electroencephalograms (EEG) patterns between the amyloid positive and negative groups using relative power measures from 19 channels (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, O1, O2), divided into eight frequency bands, delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha 1 (8–10 Hz), alpha 2 (10–12 Hz), beta 1 (12–15 Hz), beta 2 (15–20 Hz), beta 3 (20–30 Hz), and gamma (30–45 Hz) calculated by FFT and denoised by iSyncBrain(®). The resulting 152 features were analyzed using a genetic algorithm strategy to identify optimal feature combinations and maximize classification accuracy. Guided by gene modeling methods, we treated each channel and frequency band of EEG power as a gene and modeled it with every possible combination within a given dimension. We then collected the models that showed the best performance and identified the genes that appeared most frequently in the superior models. By repeating this process, we converged on a model that approximates the optimum. We found that the average performance increased as this iterative development of the genetic algorithm progressed. We ultimately achieved 85.7% sensitivity, 89.3% specificity, and 88.6% accuracy in SCD amyloid positive/negative classification, and 83.3% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity, and 84.6% accuracy in MCI amyloid positive/negative classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8632633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86326332021-12-02 Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic Kim, Nam Heon Yang, Dong Won Choi, Seong Hye Kang, Seung Wan Front Comput Neurosci Computational Neuroscience The use of positron emission tomography (PET) as the initial or sole biomarker of β-amyloid (Aβ) brain pathology may inhibit Alzheimer’s disease (AD) drug development and clinical use due to cost, access, and tolerability. We developed a qEEG-ML algorithm to predict Aβ pathology among subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and validated it using Aβ PET. We compared QEEG data between patients with MCI and those with SCD with and without PET-confirmed beta-amyloid plaque. We compared resting-state eyes-closed electroencephalograms (EEG) patterns between the amyloid positive and negative groups using relative power measures from 19 channels (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, O1, O2), divided into eight frequency bands, delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha 1 (8–10 Hz), alpha 2 (10–12 Hz), beta 1 (12–15 Hz), beta 2 (15–20 Hz), beta 3 (20–30 Hz), and gamma (30–45 Hz) calculated by FFT and denoised by iSyncBrain(®). The resulting 152 features were analyzed using a genetic algorithm strategy to identify optimal feature combinations and maximize classification accuracy. Guided by gene modeling methods, we treated each channel and frequency band of EEG power as a gene and modeled it with every possible combination within a given dimension. We then collected the models that showed the best performance and identified the genes that appeared most frequently in the superior models. By repeating this process, we converged on a model that approximates the optimum. We found that the average performance increased as this iterative development of the genetic algorithm progressed. We ultimately achieved 85.7% sensitivity, 89.3% specificity, and 88.6% accuracy in SCD amyloid positive/negative classification, and 83.3% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity, and 84.6% accuracy in MCI amyloid positive/negative classification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8632633/ /pubmed/34867252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2021.755499 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kim, Yang, Choi and Kang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Computational Neuroscience
Kim, Nam Heon
Yang, Dong Won
Choi, Seong Hye
Kang, Seung Wan
Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic
title Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic
title_full Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic
title_fullStr Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic
title_short Machine Learning to Predict Brain Amyloid Pathology in Pre-dementia Alzheimer’s Disease Using QEEG Features and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic
title_sort machine learning to predict brain amyloid pathology in pre-dementia alzheimer’s disease using qeeg features and genetic algorithm heuristic
topic Computational Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2021.755499
work_keys_str_mv AT kimnamheon machinelearningtopredictbrainamyloidpathologyinpredementiaalzheimersdiseaseusingqeegfeaturesandgeneticalgorithmheuristic
AT yangdongwon machinelearningtopredictbrainamyloidpathologyinpredementiaalzheimersdiseaseusingqeegfeaturesandgeneticalgorithmheuristic
AT choiseonghye machinelearningtopredictbrainamyloidpathologyinpredementiaalzheimersdiseaseusingqeegfeaturesandgeneticalgorithmheuristic
AT kangseungwan machinelearningtopredictbrainamyloidpathologyinpredementiaalzheimersdiseaseusingqeegfeaturesandgeneticalgorithmheuristic