Cargando…

ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter

Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is not rare. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of electrocardiographic parameters on new-onset AF post-typical AFL ablation. Methods: A total of 158 consecutive patients (79.1% males, mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Hailei, Gu, Zhoushan, Zhu, Chao, Li, Mingfang, Jiao, Jincheng, Chen, Hongwu, Yang, Gang, Ju, Weizhu, Gu, Kai, Zhang, Fengxiang, Chen, Lin Yee, Yang, Di, Chen, Minglong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.739350
_version_ 1784607816094318592
author Liu, Hailei
Gu, Zhoushan
Zhu, Chao
Li, Mingfang
Jiao, Jincheng
Chen, Hongwu
Yang, Gang
Ju, Weizhu
Gu, Kai
Zhang, Fengxiang
Chen, Lin Yee
Yang, Di
Chen, Minglong
author_facet Liu, Hailei
Gu, Zhoushan
Zhu, Chao
Li, Mingfang
Jiao, Jincheng
Chen, Hongwu
Yang, Gang
Ju, Weizhu
Gu, Kai
Zhang, Fengxiang
Chen, Lin Yee
Yang, Di
Chen, Minglong
author_sort Liu, Hailei
collection PubMed
description Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is not rare. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of electrocardiographic parameters on new-onset AF post-typical AFL ablation. Methods: A total of 158 consecutive patients (79.1% males, mean age 57.8 ± 14.3 years) with typical AFL were enrolled between January 2012 and August 2017 in this single-center study. Patients with a history of AF before ablation were excluded. ECGs during sinus rhythm (SR) and AFL were collected. The duration of the negative component of flutter wave in lead II (D(FNII)), proportion of the D(FNII) of the total circle length of AFL (D(FNII)%), amplitude of the negative component of flutter wave in lead II (A(FNII)), duration (D(PNV1)), and amplitude (A(PNV1)) of negative component of the P wave in lead V1, and P wave duration in lead II (D(PII)) during sinus rhythm were measured. Results: During a median follow-up of 26.9 ± 11.8 months, 22 cases (13.9%) developed new-onset AF. D(FNII) was significantly longer in patients with new-onset AF compared to patients without AF (114.7 ± 29.6 ms vs. 82.7 ± 12.8 ms, p < 0.0001). A(FNII) was significantly lower (0.118 ± 0.034 mV vs. 0.168 ± 0.051 mV, p < 0.0001), D(PII) (144.21 ± 23.77 ms vs. 111.46 ± 14.19 ms, p < 0.0001), and D(PNV1) was significantly longer (81.07 ± 16.87 ms vs. 59.86 ± 14.42 ms, p < 0.0001) in patients with new-onset AF. In the multivariate analysis, D(FNII) [odds ratio (OR), 1.428; 95% CI, 1.039–1.962; p = 0.028] and D(PII) (OR, 1.429; 95% CI, 1.046–1.953; p = 0.025) were found to be independently associated with new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation. Conclusion: Parameters representing left atrial activation time under both the SR and AFL were independently associated with new-onset AF post-typical AFL ablation and may be useful in risk prediction, which needs to be confirmed by further prospective studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8632776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86327762021-12-02 ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter Liu, Hailei Gu, Zhoushan Zhu, Chao Li, Mingfang Jiao, Jincheng Chen, Hongwu Yang, Gang Ju, Weizhu Gu, Kai Zhang, Fengxiang Chen, Lin Yee Yang, Di Chen, Minglong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is not rare. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of electrocardiographic parameters on new-onset AF post-typical AFL ablation. Methods: A total of 158 consecutive patients (79.1% males, mean age 57.8 ± 14.3 years) with typical AFL were enrolled between January 2012 and August 2017 in this single-center study. Patients with a history of AF before ablation were excluded. ECGs during sinus rhythm (SR) and AFL were collected. The duration of the negative component of flutter wave in lead II (D(FNII)), proportion of the D(FNII) of the total circle length of AFL (D(FNII)%), amplitude of the negative component of flutter wave in lead II (A(FNII)), duration (D(PNV1)), and amplitude (A(PNV1)) of negative component of the P wave in lead V1, and P wave duration in lead II (D(PII)) during sinus rhythm were measured. Results: During a median follow-up of 26.9 ± 11.8 months, 22 cases (13.9%) developed new-onset AF. D(FNII) was significantly longer in patients with new-onset AF compared to patients without AF (114.7 ± 29.6 ms vs. 82.7 ± 12.8 ms, p < 0.0001). A(FNII) was significantly lower (0.118 ± 0.034 mV vs. 0.168 ± 0.051 mV, p < 0.0001), D(PII) (144.21 ± 23.77 ms vs. 111.46 ± 14.19 ms, p < 0.0001), and D(PNV1) was significantly longer (81.07 ± 16.87 ms vs. 59.86 ± 14.42 ms, p < 0.0001) in patients with new-onset AF. In the multivariate analysis, D(FNII) [odds ratio (OR), 1.428; 95% CI, 1.039–1.962; p = 0.028] and D(PII) (OR, 1.429; 95% CI, 1.046–1.953; p = 0.025) were found to be independently associated with new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation. Conclusion: Parameters representing left atrial activation time under both the SR and AFL were independently associated with new-onset AF post-typical AFL ablation and may be useful in risk prediction, which needs to be confirmed by further prospective studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8632776/ /pubmed/34869644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.739350 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Gu, Zhu, Li, Jiao, Chen, Yang, Ju, Gu, Zhang, Chen, Yang and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Liu, Hailei
Gu, Zhoushan
Zhu, Chao
Li, Mingfang
Jiao, Jincheng
Chen, Hongwu
Yang, Gang
Ju, Weizhu
Gu, Kai
Zhang, Fengxiang
Chen, Lin Yee
Yang, Di
Chen, Minglong
ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter
title ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter
title_full ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter
title_fullStr ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter
title_full_unstemmed ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter
title_short ECG Predictors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within a Year After Radiofrequency Ablation of Counterclockwise-Rotating Atrial Flutter
title_sort ecg predictors for new-onset atrial fibrillation within a year after radiofrequency ablation of counterclockwise-rotating atrial flutter
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.739350
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhailei ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT guzhoushan ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT zhuchao ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT limingfang ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT jiaojincheng ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT chenhongwu ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT yanggang ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT juweizhu ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT gukai ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT zhangfengxiang ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT chenlinyee ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT yangdi ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter
AT chenminglong ecgpredictorsfornewonsetatrialfibrillationwithinayearafterradiofrequencyablationofcounterclockwiserotatingatrialflutter