Cargando…

Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation

Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common during pressure support ventilation (PSV) because of the constant cycling-off criteria and variation of respiratory system mechanical properties in individual patients. Automatic adjustment of inspiratory triggers and cycling-off criteria based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ling, Yu, Yue, Xu, Xiaoting, Sun, Qin, Qiu, Haibo, Chiumello, Davide, Yang, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.752508
_version_ 1784607819684642816
author Liu, Ling
Yu, Yue
Xu, Xiaoting
Sun, Qin
Qiu, Haibo
Chiumello, Davide
Yang, Yi
author_facet Liu, Ling
Yu, Yue
Xu, Xiaoting
Sun, Qin
Qiu, Haibo
Chiumello, Davide
Yang, Yi
author_sort Liu, Ling
collection PubMed
description Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common during pressure support ventilation (PSV) because of the constant cycling-off criteria and variation of respiratory system mechanical properties in individual patients. Automatic adjustment of inspiratory triggers and cycling-off criteria based on waveforms might be a useful tool to improve patient-ventilator asynchrony during PSV. Method: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and were ventilated using PSV with different cycling-off criteria of 10% (PS(10)), 30% (PS(30)), 50% (PS(50)), and automatic adjustment PSV (PS(AUTO)). Patient-ventilator interactions were measured. Results: The total asynchrony index (AI) and NeuroSync index were consistently lower in PS(AUTO) when compared with PS(10), PS(30), and PS(50), (P < 0.05). The benefit of PS(AUTO) in reducing the total AI was mainly because of the reduction of the micro-AI but not the macro-AI. PS(AUTO) significantly improved the relative cycling-off error when compared with prefixed controlled PSV (P < 0.05). PS(AUTO) significantly reduced the trigger error and inspiratory effort for the trigger when compared with a prefixed trigger. However, total inspiratory effort, breathing patterns, and respiratory drive were not different among modes. Conclusions: When compared with fixed cycling-off criteria, an automatic adjustment system improved patient-ventilator asynchrony without changes in breathing patterns during PSV. The automatic adjustment system could be a useful tool to titrate more personalized mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8632800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86328002021-12-02 Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation Liu, Ling Yu, Yue Xu, Xiaoting Sun, Qin Qiu, Haibo Chiumello, Davide Yang, Yi Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common during pressure support ventilation (PSV) because of the constant cycling-off criteria and variation of respiratory system mechanical properties in individual patients. Automatic adjustment of inspiratory triggers and cycling-off criteria based on waveforms might be a useful tool to improve patient-ventilator asynchrony during PSV. Method: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and were ventilated using PSV with different cycling-off criteria of 10% (PS(10)), 30% (PS(30)), 50% (PS(50)), and automatic adjustment PSV (PS(AUTO)). Patient-ventilator interactions were measured. Results: The total asynchrony index (AI) and NeuroSync index were consistently lower in PS(AUTO) when compared with PS(10), PS(30), and PS(50), (P < 0.05). The benefit of PS(AUTO) in reducing the total AI was mainly because of the reduction of the micro-AI but not the macro-AI. PS(AUTO) significantly improved the relative cycling-off error when compared with prefixed controlled PSV (P < 0.05). PS(AUTO) significantly reduced the trigger error and inspiratory effort for the trigger when compared with a prefixed trigger. However, total inspiratory effort, breathing patterns, and respiratory drive were not different among modes. Conclusions: When compared with fixed cycling-off criteria, an automatic adjustment system improved patient-ventilator asynchrony without changes in breathing patterns during PSV. The automatic adjustment system could be a useful tool to titrate more personalized mechanical ventilation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8632800/ /pubmed/34869448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.752508 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Yu, Xu, Sun, Qiu, Chiumello and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Liu, Ling
Yu, Yue
Xu, Xiaoting
Sun, Qin
Qiu, Haibo
Chiumello, Davide
Yang, Yi
Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation
title Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation
title_full Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation
title_fullStr Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation
title_short Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation
title_sort automatic adjustment of the inspiratory trigger and cycling-off criteria improved patient-ventilator asynchrony during pressure support ventilation
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.752508
work_keys_str_mv AT liuling automaticadjustmentoftheinspiratorytriggerandcyclingoffcriteriaimprovedpatientventilatorasynchronyduringpressuresupportventilation
AT yuyue automaticadjustmentoftheinspiratorytriggerandcyclingoffcriteriaimprovedpatientventilatorasynchronyduringpressuresupportventilation
AT xuxiaoting automaticadjustmentoftheinspiratorytriggerandcyclingoffcriteriaimprovedpatientventilatorasynchronyduringpressuresupportventilation
AT sunqin automaticadjustmentoftheinspiratorytriggerandcyclingoffcriteriaimprovedpatientventilatorasynchronyduringpressuresupportventilation
AT qiuhaibo automaticadjustmentoftheinspiratorytriggerandcyclingoffcriteriaimprovedpatientventilatorasynchronyduringpressuresupportventilation
AT chiumellodavide automaticadjustmentoftheinspiratorytriggerandcyclingoffcriteriaimprovedpatientventilatorasynchronyduringpressuresupportventilation
AT yangyi automaticadjustmentoftheinspiratorytriggerandcyclingoffcriteriaimprovedpatientventilatorasynchronyduringpressuresupportventilation