Cargando…
The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
PURPOSE: More than a decade after the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed, there is a paucity of research on the general public’s awareness of GINA. This study’s objective was to assess knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination. METHODS: A quota-based sample of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w |
_version_ | 1784607870673747968 |
---|---|
author | Lenartz, Andrea Scherer, Aaron M. Uhlmann, Wendy R. Suter, Sonia M. Hartley, Colleen Anderson Prince, Anya E.R. |
author_facet | Lenartz, Andrea Scherer, Aaron M. Uhlmann, Wendy R. Suter, Sonia M. Hartley, Colleen Anderson Prince, Anya E.R. |
author_sort | Lenartz, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: More than a decade after the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed, there is a paucity of research on the general public’s awareness of GINA. This study’s objective was to assess knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination. METHODS: A quota-based sample of U.S. adults (N=421) was recruited via Qualtrics Research Services to complete an online survey. RESULTS: Overall, participants had a mean age of 43.1 (SD=13.9), 51.8% identified as female, 63.1% identified as non-Hispanic White, and 38.4% had ≥4-year college degree. Respondents reported relatively low subjective knowledge of GINA (M=3.10, SD=1.98; 7-point Likert scale). Among respondents reporting high subjective knowledge of GINA (16.2%), 92.6% incorrectly reported or did not know that GINA does not cover life, long-term care, and disability insurance, and this number was 82.4% for auto or property insurance. Respondents were relatively likely to decline genetic testing due to concerns about results being used to determine eligibility for employment (M=4.68, SD=1.89) or health insurance (M=4.94, SD=1.73). There were few consistent demographic associations with either subjective or objective knowledge of GINA. CONCLUSION: This study highlights continued public concern of genetic discrimination and a lack of awareness and understanding of GINA and its scope of protections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8633070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86330702022-02-16 The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage Lenartz, Andrea Scherer, Aaron M. Uhlmann, Wendy R. Suter, Sonia M. Hartley, Colleen Anderson Prince, Anya E.R. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: More than a decade after the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed, there is a paucity of research on the general public’s awareness of GINA. This study’s objective was to assess knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination. METHODS: A quota-based sample of U.S. adults (N=421) was recruited via Qualtrics Research Services to complete an online survey. RESULTS: Overall, participants had a mean age of 43.1 (SD=13.9), 51.8% identified as female, 63.1% identified as non-Hispanic White, and 38.4% had ≥4-year college degree. Respondents reported relatively low subjective knowledge of GINA (M=3.10, SD=1.98; 7-point Likert scale). Among respondents reporting high subjective knowledge of GINA (16.2%), 92.6% incorrectly reported or did not know that GINA does not cover life, long-term care, and disability insurance, and this number was 82.4% for auto or property insurance. Respondents were relatively likely to decline genetic testing due to concerns about results being used to determine eligibility for employment (M=4.68, SD=1.89) or health insurance (M=4.94, SD=1.73). There were few consistent demographic associations with either subjective or objective knowledge of GINA. CONCLUSION: This study highlights continued public concern of genetic discrimination and a lack of awareness and understanding of GINA and its scope of protections. 2021-08-16 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8633070/ /pubmed/34400812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#termsUsers may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Lenartz, Andrea Scherer, Aaron M. Uhlmann, Wendy R. Suter, Sonia M. Hartley, Colleen Anderson Prince, Anya E.R. The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage |
title | The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after
passage |
title_full | The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after
passage |
title_fullStr | The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after
passage |
title_full_unstemmed | The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after
passage |
title_short | The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after
passage |
title_sort | persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the genetic
information nondiscrimination act (gina) more than a decade after
passage |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lenartzandrea thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT schereraaronm thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT uhlmannwendyr thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT sutersoniam thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT hartleycolleenanderson thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT princeanyaer thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT lenartzandrea persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT schereraaronm persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT uhlmannwendyr persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT sutersoniam persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT hartleycolleenanderson persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage AT princeanyaer persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage |