Cargando…

The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage

PURPOSE: More than a decade after the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed, there is a paucity of research on the general public’s awareness of GINA. This study’s objective was to assess knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination. METHODS: A quota-based sample of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lenartz, Andrea, Scherer, Aaron M., Uhlmann, Wendy R., Suter, Sonia M., Hartley, Colleen Anderson, Prince, Anya E.R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w
_version_ 1784607870673747968
author Lenartz, Andrea
Scherer, Aaron M.
Uhlmann, Wendy R.
Suter, Sonia M.
Hartley, Colleen Anderson
Prince, Anya E.R.
author_facet Lenartz, Andrea
Scherer, Aaron M.
Uhlmann, Wendy R.
Suter, Sonia M.
Hartley, Colleen Anderson
Prince, Anya E.R.
author_sort Lenartz, Andrea
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: More than a decade after the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed, there is a paucity of research on the general public’s awareness of GINA. This study’s objective was to assess knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination. METHODS: A quota-based sample of U.S. adults (N=421) was recruited via Qualtrics Research Services to complete an online survey. RESULTS: Overall, participants had a mean age of 43.1 (SD=13.9), 51.8% identified as female, 63.1% identified as non-Hispanic White, and 38.4% had ≥4-year college degree. Respondents reported relatively low subjective knowledge of GINA (M=3.10, SD=1.98; 7-point Likert scale). Among respondents reporting high subjective knowledge of GINA (16.2%), 92.6% incorrectly reported or did not know that GINA does not cover life, long-term care, and disability insurance, and this number was 82.4% for auto or property insurance. Respondents were relatively likely to decline genetic testing due to concerns about results being used to determine eligibility for employment (M=4.68, SD=1.89) or health insurance (M=4.94, SD=1.73). There were few consistent demographic associations with either subjective or objective knowledge of GINA. CONCLUSION: This study highlights continued public concern of genetic discrimination and a lack of awareness and understanding of GINA and its scope of protections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86330702022-02-16 The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage Lenartz, Andrea Scherer, Aaron M. Uhlmann, Wendy R. Suter, Sonia M. Hartley, Colleen Anderson Prince, Anya E.R. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: More than a decade after the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed, there is a paucity of research on the general public’s awareness of GINA. This study’s objective was to assess knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination. METHODS: A quota-based sample of U.S. adults (N=421) was recruited via Qualtrics Research Services to complete an online survey. RESULTS: Overall, participants had a mean age of 43.1 (SD=13.9), 51.8% identified as female, 63.1% identified as non-Hispanic White, and 38.4% had ≥4-year college degree. Respondents reported relatively low subjective knowledge of GINA (M=3.10, SD=1.98; 7-point Likert scale). Among respondents reporting high subjective knowledge of GINA (16.2%), 92.6% incorrectly reported or did not know that GINA does not cover life, long-term care, and disability insurance, and this number was 82.4% for auto or property insurance. Respondents were relatively likely to decline genetic testing due to concerns about results being used to determine eligibility for employment (M=4.68, SD=1.89) or health insurance (M=4.94, SD=1.73). There were few consistent demographic associations with either subjective or objective knowledge of GINA. CONCLUSION: This study highlights continued public concern of genetic discrimination and a lack of awareness and understanding of GINA and its scope of protections. 2021-08-16 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8633070/ /pubmed/34400812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#termsUsers may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Lenartz, Andrea
Scherer, Aaron M.
Uhlmann, Wendy R.
Suter, Sonia M.
Hartley, Colleen Anderson
Prince, Anya E.R.
The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
title The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
title_full The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
title_fullStr The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
title_full_unstemmed The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
title_short The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
title_sort persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the genetic information nondiscrimination act (gina) more than a decade after passage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lenartzandrea thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT schereraaronm thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT uhlmannwendyr thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT sutersoniam thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT hartleycolleenanderson thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT princeanyaer thepersistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT lenartzandrea persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT schereraaronm persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT uhlmannwendyr persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT sutersoniam persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT hartleycolleenanderson persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage
AT princeanyaer persistentlackofknowledgeandmisunderstandingofthegeneticinformationnondiscriminationactginamorethanadecadeafterpassage