Cargando…
Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis
Now solid renal tumors ≤4 cm is the most common, especially the subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) of malignant kidney tumors in clinical. However, there is not specific characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) be recommended by the EFSUMB Guidelines in distinguish the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4365 |
_version_ | 1784607884316770304 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yang Kan, Yanmin Zhang, Jincun Li, Ning Wang, Yihua |
author_facet | Liu, Yang Kan, Yanmin Zhang, Jincun Li, Ning Wang, Yihua |
author_sort | Liu, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Now solid renal tumors ≤4 cm is the most common, especially the subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) of malignant kidney tumors in clinical. However, there is not specific characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) be recommended by the EFSUMB Guidelines in distinguish the essence of the kidney tumor with different sizes. Therefore, this meta‐analysis aimed to assess the ability of CEUS to diagnose solid ccRCC (sccRCC) ≤4 cm. We comprehensively searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 28 July 2020, for studies reporting the CEUS features of sccRCC lesions ≤4 cm. Additional articles were identified through the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Studies were selected independently by two investigators and the relevant data were extracted. Discrepancies were resolved via discussion with the senior author. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool, and the sensitivity and specificity of each study were determined and plotted as a receiver operating characteristic curve. Ten studies were included in this meta‐analysis. Hyperenhancement showed medium sensitivity (67%–89%) and specificity (42%–75%) for diagnosing sccRCC ≤4 cm, fast‐in contrast agent and heterogeneous enhancement showed high diagnostic abilities (area under curve (AUC) 0.74–0.84), but the presence of a pseudocapsule and fast‐out contrast agent had poor diagnostic ability (AUC <0.70). The combination of hyperenhancement and iso‐enhancement showed high sensitivity (98%) for diagnosing sccRCC ≤4 cm. Hyperenhancement, fast‐in contrast agent, and heterogeneous enhancement may be specific features that could help to identify sccRCC ≤4 cm, while the presence of a pseudocapsule and fast‐out of contrast agent may have low diagnostic values. The combination of multiple indexes may improve the diagnostic value of CEUS for sccRCC ≤4 cm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8633224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86332242021-12-06 Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis Liu, Yang Kan, Yanmin Zhang, Jincun Li, Ning Wang, Yihua Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Now solid renal tumors ≤4 cm is the most common, especially the subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) of malignant kidney tumors in clinical. However, there is not specific characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) be recommended by the EFSUMB Guidelines in distinguish the essence of the kidney tumor with different sizes. Therefore, this meta‐analysis aimed to assess the ability of CEUS to diagnose solid ccRCC (sccRCC) ≤4 cm. We comprehensively searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 28 July 2020, for studies reporting the CEUS features of sccRCC lesions ≤4 cm. Additional articles were identified through the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Studies were selected independently by two investigators and the relevant data were extracted. Discrepancies were resolved via discussion with the senior author. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool, and the sensitivity and specificity of each study were determined and plotted as a receiver operating characteristic curve. Ten studies were included in this meta‐analysis. Hyperenhancement showed medium sensitivity (67%–89%) and specificity (42%–75%) for diagnosing sccRCC ≤4 cm, fast‐in contrast agent and heterogeneous enhancement showed high diagnostic abilities (area under curve (AUC) 0.74–0.84), but the presence of a pseudocapsule and fast‐out contrast agent had poor diagnostic ability (AUC <0.70). The combination of hyperenhancement and iso‐enhancement showed high sensitivity (98%) for diagnosing sccRCC ≤4 cm. Hyperenhancement, fast‐in contrast agent, and heterogeneous enhancement may be specific features that could help to identify sccRCC ≤4 cm, while the presence of a pseudocapsule and fast‐out of contrast agent may have low diagnostic values. The combination of multiple indexes may improve the diagnostic value of CEUS for sccRCC ≤4 cm. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8633224/ /pubmed/34725960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4365 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Liu, Yang Kan, Yanmin Zhang, Jincun Li, Ning Wang, Yihua Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis |
title | Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | characteristics of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyang characteristicsofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfordiagnosisofsolidclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas4cmametaanalysis AT kanyanmin characteristicsofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfordiagnosisofsolidclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas4cmametaanalysis AT zhangjincun characteristicsofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfordiagnosisofsolidclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas4cmametaanalysis AT lining characteristicsofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfordiagnosisofsolidclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas4cmametaanalysis AT wangyihua characteristicsofcontrastenhancedultrasoundfordiagnosisofsolidclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas4cmametaanalysis |