Cargando…

Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?

The ILAE practical definition of epilepsy has a one seizure possibility to diagnose epilepsy after a first seizure if the recurrence risk is very high. The recurrence risk after a first seizure in brain disorders (first remote seizure) is often high, but varies with etiology, so more specific inform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zelano, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34561959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12543
_version_ 1784607933554753536
author Zelano, Johan
author_facet Zelano, Johan
author_sort Zelano, Johan
collection PubMed
description The ILAE practical definition of epilepsy has a one seizure possibility to diagnose epilepsy after a first seizure if the recurrence risk is very high. The recurrence risk after a first seizure in brain disorders (first remote seizure) is often high, but varies with etiology, so more specific information is needed for clinical practice. This review describes etiology‐specific recurrence risks in adults with a first remote seizure in stroke, traumatic brain injury, infections, dementia, multiple sclerosis, and tumors. Most studies are short, single center, and retrospective. Inclusion criteria, outcome ascertainment, and results vary. Few patient categories are clearly above the epilepsy threshold of recurrence risk, and there are surprisingly little data for important etiologies like brain infections. Beside stroke, severe TBI could have a sufficiently high recurrence risk for early epilepsy diagnosis, but more studies are needed, preferably prospective ones. The literature is uninformative regarding which seizures qualify as remote. The clinical implication of the low level of available evidence is that for other etiologies than stroke, seizure recurrence remains the most appropriate indicator of epilepsy for most patients with a first remote seizure. Nonetheless, there are worrying indications of a diagnostic drift, which puts patients with a preexisting brain disorder at risk of misdiagnosis. Although there are drawbacks to an intermediate term like “possible epilepsy,” it could perhaps be useful in cases when the recurrence risk is high, but epilepsy criteria are not definitely met after a first remote seizure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86334702021-12-06 Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not? Zelano, Johan Epilepsia Open Critical Review The ILAE practical definition of epilepsy has a one seizure possibility to diagnose epilepsy after a first seizure if the recurrence risk is very high. The recurrence risk after a first seizure in brain disorders (first remote seizure) is often high, but varies with etiology, so more specific information is needed for clinical practice. This review describes etiology‐specific recurrence risks in adults with a first remote seizure in stroke, traumatic brain injury, infections, dementia, multiple sclerosis, and tumors. Most studies are short, single center, and retrospective. Inclusion criteria, outcome ascertainment, and results vary. Few patient categories are clearly above the epilepsy threshold of recurrence risk, and there are surprisingly little data for important etiologies like brain infections. Beside stroke, severe TBI could have a sufficiently high recurrence risk for early epilepsy diagnosis, but more studies are needed, preferably prospective ones. The literature is uninformative regarding which seizures qualify as remote. The clinical implication of the low level of available evidence is that for other etiologies than stroke, seizure recurrence remains the most appropriate indicator of epilepsy for most patients with a first remote seizure. Nonetheless, there are worrying indications of a diagnostic drift, which puts patients with a preexisting brain disorder at risk of misdiagnosis. Although there are drawbacks to an intermediate term like “possible epilepsy,” it could perhaps be useful in cases when the recurrence risk is high, but epilepsy criteria are not definitely met after a first remote seizure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8633470/ /pubmed/34561959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12543 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Critical Review
Zelano, Johan
Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_full Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_fullStr Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_full_unstemmed Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_short Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_sort recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: epilepsy or not?
topic Critical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34561959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12543
work_keys_str_mv AT zelanojohan recurrenceriskafterafirstremotesymptomaticseizureinadultsepilepsyornot