Cargando…

The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of paroxysmal spells of indeterminate nature (PSIN) in a large cohort of children and adults with suspected new‐onset seizures, to evaluate the reasons for including patients in this category, and to calculate the rate of erroneous dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Halabi, Tarek, Dirani, Maya, Nasreddine, Wassim, Hmaimess, Ghassan, El Sabbagh, Sandra, Wazne, Jaafar, Toufaili, Hassan, Hasbini, Dana, Beydoun, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34596366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12544
_version_ 1784607934782636032
author El Halabi, Tarek
Dirani, Maya
Nasreddine, Wassim
Hmaimess, Ghassan
El Sabbagh, Sandra
Wazne, Jaafar
Toufaili, Hassan
Hasbini, Dana
Beydoun, Ahmad
author_facet El Halabi, Tarek
Dirani, Maya
Nasreddine, Wassim
Hmaimess, Ghassan
El Sabbagh, Sandra
Wazne, Jaafar
Toufaili, Hassan
Hasbini, Dana
Beydoun, Ahmad
author_sort El Halabi, Tarek
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of paroxysmal spells of indeterminate nature (PSIN) in a large cohort of children and adults with suspected new‐onset seizures, to evaluate the reasons for including patients in this category, and to calculate the rate of erroneous diagnoses if the epileptologists were compelled to label those events as epileptic seizures or nonepileptic paroxysmal spells. METHODS: Patients identified for this study participated in a prospective study evaluating patients with suspected new‐onset unprovoked seizures. The workup included a detailed history and a thorough description of the spells, a 3‐hour video EEG recording, and an epilepsy protocol brain MRI. Based exclusively on a detailed description of the ictal events, two epileptologists were asked to independently classify each patient into those with a definite diagnosis of unprovoked seizures or a definite diagnosis of a nonepileptic paroxysmal spells (group 1) and those with PSIN (group 2). RESULTS: A total of 1880 consecutive patients were enrolled with 255 (13.6%) included in the PSIN group. Patients with PSIN were significantly younger than those with a definite diagnosis, and PSIN were significantly more frequent in children with developmental delay. The most common reason for including patients in the PSIN group was the inability to categorically discriminate between a seizure and a nonepileptic mimicker. When the raters were compelled to classify the spells in the PSIN group, the frequencies of erroneous diagnoses ranged between 32% and 38%. The final diagnoses on those patients were made based on the results of the EEG, MRI, and follow‐up visits. SIGNIFICANCE: Our data indicate that a diagnostic category of PSIN should be recognized and ought to be used in clinical practice. Acknowledging this uncertainty will result in lower frequencies of erroneous diagnoses, possible stigma, and potential exposure to unnecessary antiseizure medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86334762021-12-06 The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells El Halabi, Tarek Dirani, Maya Nasreddine, Wassim Hmaimess, Ghassan El Sabbagh, Sandra Wazne, Jaafar Toufaili, Hassan Hasbini, Dana Beydoun, Ahmad Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of paroxysmal spells of indeterminate nature (PSIN) in a large cohort of children and adults with suspected new‐onset seizures, to evaluate the reasons for including patients in this category, and to calculate the rate of erroneous diagnoses if the epileptologists were compelled to label those events as epileptic seizures or nonepileptic paroxysmal spells. METHODS: Patients identified for this study participated in a prospective study evaluating patients with suspected new‐onset unprovoked seizures. The workup included a detailed history and a thorough description of the spells, a 3‐hour video EEG recording, and an epilepsy protocol brain MRI. Based exclusively on a detailed description of the ictal events, two epileptologists were asked to independently classify each patient into those with a definite diagnosis of unprovoked seizures or a definite diagnosis of a nonepileptic paroxysmal spells (group 1) and those with PSIN (group 2). RESULTS: A total of 1880 consecutive patients were enrolled with 255 (13.6%) included in the PSIN group. Patients with PSIN were significantly younger than those with a definite diagnosis, and PSIN were significantly more frequent in children with developmental delay. The most common reason for including patients in the PSIN group was the inability to categorically discriminate between a seizure and a nonepileptic mimicker. When the raters were compelled to classify the spells in the PSIN group, the frequencies of erroneous diagnoses ranged between 32% and 38%. The final diagnoses on those patients were made based on the results of the EEG, MRI, and follow‐up visits. SIGNIFICANCE: Our data indicate that a diagnostic category of PSIN should be recognized and ought to be used in clinical practice. Acknowledging this uncertainty will result in lower frequencies of erroneous diagnoses, possible stigma, and potential exposure to unnecessary antiseizure medications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8633476/ /pubmed/34596366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12544 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
El Halabi, Tarek
Dirani, Maya
Nasreddine, Wassim
Hmaimess, Ghassan
El Sabbagh, Sandra
Wazne, Jaafar
Toufaili, Hassan
Hasbini, Dana
Beydoun, Ahmad
The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells
title The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells
title_full The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells
title_fullStr The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells
title_full_unstemmed The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells
title_short The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells
title_sort importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new‐onset paroxysmal spells
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34596366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12544
work_keys_str_mv AT elhalabitarek theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT diranimaya theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT nasreddinewassim theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT hmaimessghassan theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT elsabbaghsandra theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT waznejaafar theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT toufailihassan theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT hasbinidana theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT beydounahmad theimportanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT elhalabitarek importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT diranimaya importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT nasreddinewassim importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT hmaimessghassan importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT elsabbaghsandra importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT waznejaafar importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT toufailihassan importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT hasbinidana importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells
AT beydounahmad importanceofacknowledgingdiagnosticuncertaintyinpatientswithnewonsetparoxysmalspells