Cargando…

The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults

OBJECTIVES: The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zawar, Ifrah, Krishnan, Balu, Mackow, Michael, Alexopoulos, Andreas, Nair, Dileep, Punia, Vineet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34543516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12541
_version_ 1784607935026954240
author Zawar, Ifrah
Krishnan, Balu
Mackow, Michael
Alexopoulos, Andreas
Nair, Dileep
Punia, Vineet
author_facet Zawar, Ifrah
Krishnan, Balu
Mackow, Michael
Alexopoulos, Andreas
Nair, Dileep
Punia, Vineet
author_sort Zawar, Ifrah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age. METHODS: We performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively). RESULTS: Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain‐responsive neurostimulation was well‐tolerated in older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86334772021-12-06 The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults Zawar, Ifrah Krishnan, Balu Mackow, Michael Alexopoulos, Andreas Nair, Dileep Punia, Vineet Epilepsia Open Short Research Articles OBJECTIVES: The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age. METHODS: We performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively). RESULTS: Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain‐responsive neurostimulation was well‐tolerated in older adults. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8633477/ /pubmed/34543516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12541 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Short Research Articles
Zawar, Ifrah
Krishnan, Balu
Mackow, Michael
Alexopoulos, Andreas
Nair, Dileep
Punia, Vineet
The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults
title The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults
title_full The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults
title_fullStr The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults
title_short The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults
title_sort efficacy, safety, and outcomes of brain‐responsive neurostimulation (rns® system) therapy in older adults
topic Short Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34543516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12541
work_keys_str_mv AT zawarifrah theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT krishnanbalu theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT mackowmichael theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT alexopoulosandreas theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT nairdileep theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT puniavineet theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT zawarifrah efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT krishnanbalu efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT mackowmichael efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT alexopoulosandreas efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT nairdileep efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults
AT puniavineet efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults