Cargando…
The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults
OBJECTIVES: The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34543516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12541 |
_version_ | 1784607935026954240 |
---|---|
author | Zawar, Ifrah Krishnan, Balu Mackow, Michael Alexopoulos, Andreas Nair, Dileep Punia, Vineet |
author_facet | Zawar, Ifrah Krishnan, Balu Mackow, Michael Alexopoulos, Andreas Nair, Dileep Punia, Vineet |
author_sort | Zawar, Ifrah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age. METHODS: We performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively). RESULTS: Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain‐responsive neurostimulation was well‐tolerated in older adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8633477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86334772021-12-06 The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults Zawar, Ifrah Krishnan, Balu Mackow, Michael Alexopoulos, Andreas Nair, Dileep Punia, Vineet Epilepsia Open Short Research Articles OBJECTIVES: The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age. METHODS: We performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively). RESULTS: Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain‐responsive neurostimulation was well‐tolerated in older adults. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8633477/ /pubmed/34543516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12541 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Short Research Articles Zawar, Ifrah Krishnan, Balu Mackow, Michael Alexopoulos, Andreas Nair, Dileep Punia, Vineet The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults |
title | The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults |
title_full | The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults |
title_short | The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain‐responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults |
title_sort | efficacy, safety, and outcomes of brain‐responsive neurostimulation (rns® system) therapy in older adults |
topic | Short Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34543516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zawarifrah theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT krishnanbalu theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT mackowmichael theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT alexopoulosandreas theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT nairdileep theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT puniavineet theefficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT zawarifrah efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT krishnanbalu efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT mackowmichael efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT alexopoulosandreas efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT nairdileep efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults AT puniavineet efficacysafetyandoutcomesofbrainresponsiveneurostimulationrnssystemtherapyinolderadults |